Multivariable model of adjusted

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

From: Treatment of Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis With Symptomatic Therapy, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, or Biologic AgentsA Cost-Effectiveness.

Advertisements

PASI responder rates (A, B) and total resolution in (C) nail psoriasis, (D) enthesitis and (E) dactylitis in affected patients receiving CZP from Week.

Algorithm based on the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Algorithm based on the.

Mean change from baseline in disease and disability outcomes at 6 months for abatacept initiators by anti-CCP status. Mean change from baseline in disease.

Mean change from baseline in (A) DAS28-4(ESR), (B) CDAI and (C) HAQ-DI

Change in secondary endpoints over time: (A) LS mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP through Week 32, (B) mean change from baseline in CRP through Week.

Radiographic progression among three therapy groups (triple therapy group, anti-TNF treatment group and MTX responders) stratified by MBDA categories at.

Persistence of first tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) by TNFi Kaplan-Meier plot of time (years) to discontinuation of treatment by TNFi. (A)

Multivariable model of abatacept retention by RF and anti-CCP status in biologic-naïve patients with or without radiographic erosion at baseline. Multivariable.

(A) EULAR response based on DAS28 (ESR, otherwise CRP) and (B) Boolean remission, at 6 months in patients treated with abatacept as a first-line biologic.

Association between anti-CCP antibody status and response to remission, LDA and mACR by anti-CCP status and TNFi initiators (multivariable models). Association.

Percentages of (A) ACR 20, 50, and 70 responders, and (B) patients with DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2 or < 2.6 during 5 years. Percentages of (A) ACR 20, 50, and 70.

Mean DAS (A), HAQ (B) and percentages in low disease activity, DAS remission and drug-free DAS remission (C) during 5 years in the DAS ≤2.4 steered (BeSt)

Time to discontinuation of TNF-inhibitors (TNF-i) and non-TNF-inhibitors (non-TNFi), non-adjusted (non-adj) and adjusted (adj) for propensity score survival.

Efficacy end points: the percentage of patients achieving an improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) of (A) 20% (ACR20), (B) 50% (ACR50)

ASAS 20/40 response rates, and mean change from baseline in BASDAI through week 156* of treatment. *For patients who discontinued, the end of treatment.

Association of disease parameters at the time of methotrexate reinitiation during the OLE based on propensity score matching. Association of disease parameters.

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes following up to 3 years of open-label adalimumab as monotherapy after 2 years of adalimumab+methotrexate.

Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR50, (B) CDAI LDA and (C) HAQ-DI

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W to week 96. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Changes in clinical disease activity over 24 months on a continuous scale in SWEFOT trial participants randomised to triple therapy or anti-TNF with available.

Correlations between observed patient-reported outcomes and disease activity scores at week 24. Correlations between observed patient-reported outcomes.

Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between abatacept plus MTX and placebo plus MTX groups. Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between.

Mean change from baseline in disease and disability outcomes at 6 months for TNFi initiators by anti-CCP status. Mean change from baseline in disease and.

HAQ-DI change from baseline and proportion of patients achieving MCID after 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination.

ACR response rates at 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination with cDMARDs or MTX. The proportions of patients.

Univariate predictors of (A) ASDAS ID (<1

ACR responder rates in patients receiving CZP from Week 0, stratified by prior anti-TNF exposure (A−C) and the proportion of patients receiving CZP from.

OR for baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12, 24, 48, 96 and 144 by univariate analysis of observed data. OR for baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12,

OR for selected baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12, 24, 48, 96 and 144 by multivariate analysis of observed data. OR for selected baseline predictors.

Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years versus younger patients: ACR outcomes at (A) week 12 and (B) week 24. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65.

Box plot of HAQ-DI scores at baseline, week 96 and week 144 categorised by baseline PsA duration. Box plot of HAQ-DI scores at baseline, week 96 and week.

Additional efficacy outcomes for the 12-week study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with baricitinib or placebo. Additional efficacy.

Different treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis in relation to radiographic progression (A) number of swollen joints (B) and fatigue severity over.

Column bar graphs showing Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores and pain score on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (scale 0–10) that were collected at.

Independent baseline predictors of non-remission at 24 months of follow-up in the SWEFOT trial population. Independent baseline predictors of non-remission.

Treatment strategy. Treatment strategy. For every patient, changes of treatment were analysed per change, for up to five subsequent therapeutic changes.

Prescription rates of (A) NSAIDs, glucocorticoids and analgaesics, (B) TNF inhibitors and synthetic DMARDs and (C) combination therapy of NSAIDs with TNF.

Algorithm based on the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis. Algorithm based on the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for.

Matrix risk model showing the probability of SRP in patients with moderate disease activity after 3 years of MTX treatment. Matrix risk model showing the.

Multivariate analysis for SRP after 3 years in patients with moderate disease activity despite MTX treatment. Multivariate analysis for SRP after 3 years.

Patient-reported adherence towards different IMID treatments in RA (A), PsA (B) or AS (C). Patient-reported adherence towards different IMID treatments.

Clinical response in patients with early and established RA at month 24. *p

Patients with RA on csDMARDs with and without GC, bDMARDs/tofacitinib with and without GC on the x axis. Patients with RA on csDMARDs with and without.

Adjusted estimates of DAS28 (95% CI) and RAPID3 (95% CI) scores over time based on multivariate models a priori adjusted for possible confounders: age,

Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR70, (B) CDAI REM and (C) SDAI REM. For tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID treatment.

Improvement in FACIT-F fatigue score according to ACR20 response status (ACR, American College of Rheumatology; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic.

Percentage of patients with RA achieving DAS28(CRP)<2

Joint damage progression evaluated as a comparison between abatacept plus MTX (grey bar) and placebo plus MTX groups (open bar). Joint damage progression.

Radiographic endpoints: (A) change from baseline in SHS at Week 52 and Week 104*†; (B) probability plots of change from baseline in SHS at Week 52 and.

Relative treatment effects concerning efficacy endpoints in patients with inadequate response to methotrexate for triple therapy versus TNFi–methotrexate.

Cox proportional-hazards model of time to first RA flare after treatment withdrawal for patients who entered the re-treatment period (n=146). Cox proportional-hazards.

Rates of ACR50 response and prespecified MTX-related adverse events in patients in the (A) CONCERTO study over 26 weeks and (B) MUSICA study over 24 weeks. ACR50, American.

Employment of patients with AS compared with controls, by BASDAI

ACR20/50/70 response rates at week 24 (TP1 per-protocol set).

DAS28-CRP change from baseline over 24 weeks (TP1 per-protocol set) at baseline, the mean DAS28-CRP was 5.42 and 5.53 for GP2015 and ETN groups, respectively.

Percentage of patients achieving 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria at week 12 by patient demographic and disease characteristics.

Percentage of responders at month 6 by (A) ACR50, SDAI/CDAI LDA, and HAQ-DI

Characteristics of the included trials on non-pharmacological treatment. Characteristics of the included trials on non-pharmacological treatment. ASDAS,

Multivariable analysis of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) over time modelled with a cubic effect of time and adjusted for age, gender, disease duration,

Efficacy as first, second and third bDMARD in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. ASAS, Assessment of Spondylo Arthritis international Society; BASDAI,

Study design. *Randomisation stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. Study design. *Randomisation stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. DAS28-CRP,

Design for the long-term extension study RA-BEYOND from randomisation in the originating studies. Design for the long-term extension study RA-BEYOND from.

Systematic review and network meta-analyses study selection flow chart

Percent of patients with ASDAS inactive disease grouped by normal or elevated CRP at baseline through week 156. §p

Improvement in BASDAI score in patients with normal or elevated CRP at baseline through week 156. *p

Percentage of patients achieving remission by conversion to ACPA seronegative status. Percentage of patients achieving remission by conversion to ACPA.

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model of time to first serious infectious events. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model of time to first serious.

Algorithm based on the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Algorithm based on the.

ACR20 (A), ACR50 (B) and MDA (C) response rates at 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or when added to background cDMARDs or.

Presentation transcript:

Multivariable model of adjusted Multivariable model of adjusted* comparisons of treatment response at week 24 between BMI subgroups in patients receiving abatacept (A) without any non-biologic DMARD and (B) in combination with a non-biologic DMARD. An OR >1 indicates a higher likelihood of response, while an OR <1 indicates a lower likelihood of response. Multivariable model of adjusted* comparisons of treatment response at week 24 between BMI subgroups in patients receiving abatacept (A) without any non-biologic DMARD and (B) in combination with a non-biologic DMARD. An OR >1 indicates a higher likelihood of response, while an OR <1 indicates a lower likelihood of response. ORs are significant when 95% CIs do not overlap 1. *The model was adjusted for the following baseline factors: treatment, BMI, MTX use, prior TNFis, CRP, erosion, enthesitis, dactylitis, BASDAI and DAS28 (CRP). ACR20, American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C reactive protein; DAS28, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; MTX, methotrexate; SHS, Sharp/van der Heijde score; TNFis, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Iain B McInnes et al. RMD Open 2019;5:e000934 Copyright © BMJ Publishing Group & EULAR. All rights reserved.