Elena Nikulina, the World Bank

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Procurement in Transition Countries: Major Trends in Provision of Access to Justice 16 July 2014 UNCITRAL Standards for Transparency, Accountability.
Advertisements

Audit of Public Procurement
The State Procurement Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan Welcomes the participants of the 11 th Public Procurement Knowledge Exchange Forum “Procurement.
1 Public Expenditure Management Peer-Assisted Learning (The “PEMPAL” Project) Presented by Montenegro Assistant Finance Minister Nikola Vukicevic and Rich.
Group 1 Russian Federation, Armenia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, Moldova, Tajikistan.
Main Achievements in Public Procurement in Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Moldova Public Procurement Agency Batumi, 2015.
Supervision and Oversight in Procurement as a Tool of Efficient Project Implementation.
EBRD Technical Cooperation Programme Caroline Clarkson Official Co-financing Unit, EBRD Bratislava, 4 March 2010.
PEM -PAL 13th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNAL AUDIT , Hotel Granit, Ohrid.
The State Procurement Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan Welcomes the participants of the 9 th Public Procurement Exchange Platform “Efficient Implementation.
Elisabetta Piselli Senior Counsel, LEGIA Procurement and Consultant Services.
Strategies for Treasury Modernization in PEMPAL Member Countries thematic survey results Elena Nikulina, World Bank, June 2012.
Budget Literacy and Transparency Working Group Key Outcomes and Prospects Anna Belenchuk, Head of the Working Group February 25, 2016.
TREASURY OF GEORGIA – MISSION AND FUNCTIONS Nino Tchelishvili June, 2016 Chisinau, Moldova.
Kishinev 2016 MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN.
1 Kishinev, Moldova June 1-3, 2016 Results of TCOP activities in FY 2016.
Future Planning for new BCOP Working Group Nicolay Begchin, MoF Russian Federation Leader of the PEMPAL BCOP Program and Performance Budgeting Working.
Expansion of OECD Performance Budgeting Survey to PEMPAL countries PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP) Nicolay Begchin, MoF Russian Federation Leader.
Overview of Program and Performance Budgeting Working Group
Treasury of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Results of TCOP activities in FY 2017
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Treasury System of the Republic of Armenia
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan
“Everyone can access”.
BUDGET transparency in the Kyrgyz Republic
MANAGING BUDGET FUNDS IN THE REPUIBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
Results Achieved Future PFM Priorities and Plans
Alexei Zverev Senior Counsel, EBRD Budapest , 7 March 2007
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM IN UZBEKISTAN
PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,
DEMPA evaluations: Coordination of debt and cash management
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
TCOP: outcomes for Baku, Azerbaijan  April 10 – 13,  2018.
Proposed Review and Update of the PEMPAL Paper
Update on Budget Literacy and Transparency Working Group Progress
Madlen Serban Sintra, 26 November 2009
PEMPAL in FY18 Budapest, Hungary July 5, 2018.
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Insights from the Open Budget Survey 2017
Group 3 Day 2.
PEMPAL TCOP Plenary Meeting:
Treasury Performance Measuring and Monitoring in Kyrgyz Republic
Group 3 Day 2.
Measuring and Monitoring Treasury Performance
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Treasury bodies of the Republic of Belarus
INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE Enabling groups
Results of TCOP Activities in FY2018
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
PEMPAL in FY18 Budapest, Hungary July 5, 2018.
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCoP)
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
 OPTIMIZING THE CHART OF ACCOUNTS DESIGN Review and Update of 2014 PEMPAL Paper Mark Silins January 2019.
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Belarus
TCOP Activities in FY2019 Budapest, Hungary June 5, 2019.
Links Between Public Procurement and Public Finance Management Information Systems in Georgia PEMPAL 2019 г.
Elena Nikulina, the World Bank
Evolution of Expenditure Controls
Elena Nikulina, the World Bank
Four-Year Journey of the TCOP Cash Management Thematic Group
Results and Plans for the Future
Kyrgyz Republic Ministry of Finance
Results of the 2019 donor survey
TCOP Activity outcomes
Budget Transparency in PEMPAL Countries
Evolution of Expenditure Controls
Republic of Croatia Ministry of Finance
Presentation transcript:

Elena Nikulina, the World Bank Links Between Public Procurement and Financial Management Information Systems in PEMPAL Countries Treasury COP Thematic Survey Results Elena Nikulina, the World Bank Budapest, Hungary June 5, 2019

Survey Objectives and Coverage - survey undertaken in preparation for the ongoing Annual Plenary Meeting, used as input to the event agenda - served the basis for this presentation, expected to establish a common ground for today’s discussion on interaction between the e-procurement and treasury information systems - contribution to PEMPAL knowledge bank of methodological, legal and analytical documentation Coverage responses received during April 29 – May 16 from all 16 TCOP countries attending the meeting THANKS TO EVERYONE!!! Only primary processing and analysis of the data undertaken, no deeper quality assurance

Which body is in charge of regulating public procurement in your country? Georgia – Public Procurement Agency under the Government Kyrgyz Republic - Department of State Procurement under the MOF Tajikistan - Agency for State Procurement of Goods, Works and Services under the Government Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Kazakhstan Albania Croatia Kosovo Georgia Russia Moldova Kyrgyz Republic Ukraine North Macedonia Tajikistan Uzbekistan Turkey

Availability of Operational E-Procurement Systems Country URL Albania https://www.app.gov.al/ Armenia https://armeps.am Belarus http://www.icetrade.by/ Croatia https://eojn.nn.hr/Oglasnik/ Georgia http://procurement.gov.ge/ Kazakstan https://www.goszakup.gov.kz/ Kosovo https://e-prokurimi.rks-gov.net/Home/ClanakItemNew.aspx Kyrgyz Republic zakupki.gov.kg Moldova mtender@gov.md North Macedonia https://e-nabavki.gov.mk Russia www.zakupki.gov.ru Turkey https://ekap.kik.gov.tr/EKAP/Default.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fEKAP%2f Ukraine https://www.prozorro.gov.ua/ Uzbekistan www.xarid.uz Total 14 E-procurement systems are operational in the majority of countries (14). Azerbaijan and Tajikistan have plans to develop such systems.

Coverage and Use of E-Procurement Systems Country e-Purchasing or e-Catalog e-Tendering e-Quotations or e-Shopping Albania x Armenia Belarus   Croatia Georgia Kazakstan Kosovo Kyrgyz Republic Moldova North Macedonia Russia Turkey Ukraine Uzbekistan Total 12 13 9 E- tendering – acquisition of goods, works and services that are of high value and low volume E-purchasing or E-catalogues – procurement of goods and services of low value and high volume E-shopping or E-quotations – low value and low volume items

Coverage and Use of E-Procurement Systems – Type / Size of Tenders / Contracts The use of E-procurement systems is mandatory for all types of contracts / tenders in Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyz Republic, and Russia In 6 countries it is mandatory for contracts above certain value. Country Contracts / tenders of certain type / value above a set amount Albania more than 800,000 ALL or 6,400 EUR Armenia more than 1 million drams Belarus more than 300 base values (base value -25.5 BYN) Croatia procurement of goods and services set at an estimated value equal to or above HRK 200,000 ($ 30,200) and for all works set at an estimated value equal to or above HRK 500,000 ($ 75,600) North Macedonia all contracts above 1,000 euros for goods and services, 5,000 euros for works and 10,000 euros for special services on annual level Ukraine 7,500 USD and above Total 6

The use of the E-Procurement system is mandatory for contracts financed from… Country Central government budget Subnational government budgets Extrabudgetary resources Donor financed projects and grants Albania Y   Armenia Belarus Croatia Georgia Kazakstan Kosovo Kyrgyz Republic Moldova North Macedonia Russia Turkey Ukraine Uzbekistan Total 14 13 9 3

Existence and Type of Data Exchange Interface between the E-Procurement System and FMIS

Level of Development of Information Exchange between the E-Procurement and FMIS Systems The most common purposes of information exchange: - automatic recording of all newly signed contracts (unique IDs) with respective payment schedules in relevant FMIS modules to ensure registration of annual commitments (7 countries), - recording of all contract amendments and delivery of outputs (6), creation (online via e-Procurement system) or transfer from FMIS of the procurement plans (5) facilitating preparation, processing and verification of payments related to tenders between public authorities and their vendors (5) facilitating preparation of detailed information reports to inform auditing, reporting and decision making (5)

Purpose of Information Exchange between the E-Procurement and FMIS Systems (1)   Russia Kazakstan Uzbekistan Armenia Georgia Kyrgyz Republic Ukraine Moldova Total Past procurement data made available in e-Procurement system to prepare forecasts for future spending in FMIS X 4 Creation (online via e-Procurement system) or transfer from FMIS of the procurement plans 5 Restricting the publication of tenders that exceed budget (appropriations) available to the spending unit Restricting the publication of tenders that exceed budget (appropriations) available to a spending unit under specific budget activities/codes 3 Initiating the workflow for revision of the spending unit’s budget in FMIS before contract signature, if estimated value of the tender exceeds available budget appropriation 2 Verification whether potential budget revisions during the procurement process have not rendered a particular procurement beyond budget allocations

Purpose of Information Exchange between the E-Procurement and FMIS Systems (2)   Russia Kazakstan Uzbekistan Armenia Georgia Kyrgyz Republic Ukraine Moldova Total Verification that the awarded contract price is not above the estimated contract value and hence beyond budget allocation X 4 Automatic recording of all newly signed contracts (unique ids) with respective payment schedules in relevant FMIS modules ensuring registration of annual commitments 7 Automatic recording of all newly signed contracts (unique ids) with respective payment schedules in relevant FMIS modules ensuring registration of multiannual commitments 3 Facilitating preparation, processing and verification of payments related to tenders between public authorities and their vendors 5 Recording of all contract amendments and delivery of outputs 6 Facilitating preparation of detailed information reports to inform auditing, reporting and decision making 12 9 1

Conclusions Responsibility for public procurement is clearly defined in all the countries and in many countries it is part of the mandate of the Ministry of Finance E-procurement systems are operational in the majority of countries and their coverage and use is expanding, so there is a strong rationale to develop information linkages with the FMISs Linkages are already established only in some countries and in most cases are limited, there is a room to develop and expand them further There are countries within the TCOP that are very advanced in this area and their experience could be useful for the others The topic is well chosen and has a potential to be explored further at the future meetings

Thank you for your attention!