R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: J. Steckert

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimization of Parallel Task Execution on the Adaptive Reconfigurable Group Organized Computing System Presenter: Lev Kirischian Department of Electrical.
Advertisements

Target Control Electronics Upgrade 08/01/2009 J. Leaver P. Smith.
7.2 System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 03-Dec Quench Detection and Energy Extraction Systems R. Denz (Quench Detection), K. Dahlerup-Petersen (Energy Extraction Systems),
Professor: Chi-Jo Wang Student : Nguyen Thi Hoai Nam DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSOR AND ENERGY CONTROL.
NIMIA October 2001, Crema, Italy - Vincenzo Piuri, University of Milan, Italy NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SENSORS AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS Part II Vincenzo.
Department of Communication Engineering, NCTU
1 5. Application Examples 5.1. Programmable compensation for analog circuits (Optimal tuning) 5.2. Programmable delays in high-speed digital circuits (Clock.
How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.
TE-MPE-EP, RD, 06-Dec QPS Data Transmission after LS1 R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP TIMBER PM WinCC OA Tsunami warning:
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
Changes in QPS R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP MPP workshop Acknowledgements: K. Dahlerup-Petersen, V. Froidbise, S. Georgakakis, B. Magnin, C. Martin, J.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
Compton Trigger Design Update Tanja Horn Compton Working Group 6 June 2008.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
TE-MPE-EP, RD, 26-Aug Workshop on QPS Software Layer Hardware / Agents R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP.
QPS R2E Status R2E Internal Meeting, October 24 th 2013Discussion 1 LS1 developments Digital Quench Protection insertion region magnets Delivery/installation.
5 th Joint Hi-Lumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting 2015 SC Link Protection A.Ballarino 28/10/2015.
1 The ILC Control Work Packages. ILC Control System Work Packages GDE Oct Who We Are Collaboration loosely formed at Snowmass which included SLAC,
Calorimeter Digitisation Prototype (Material from A Straessner, C Bohm et al) L1Calo Collaboration Meeting Cambridge 23-Mar-2011 Norman Gee.
Andrzej SIEMKO CERN, Geneva The 2014 Kyoto Workshop on HTS Magnet Technology for High Energy Physics –WAMHTS-2.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, LHC Performance Workshop - Chamonix Feb R. Denz TE-MPE-CP on behalf of the QPS team QPS Upgrade and Re-commissioning.
Quench Detection System R. Denz TE-MPE-EP on behalf of the QPS team.
1 J. Mourao (TE/MPE/CP) Enhanced DQHDS functionality  Status for 2011  Increase Magnet diagnostic capabilities  Our proposals.
B. Todd et al. 19 th August 2009 The Beam Interlock System Thanks to: Machine Protection Panel, R. Schmidt, B. Puccio, M. Zerlauth and many more… 0v2.
TE-MPE participation on the GSI-CERN Collaboration for Testing Super-FRS's Superconducting Magnets (aka FAIR project) Daniel Calcoen Acknowledgements:
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 12-Dec QPS - analysis of main problems, areas to target, possible improvements R. Denz, TE-MPE-CP Evian 2011.
CERN TE-MPE-EP, RD, 09-April Quench Protection Systems (QPS) for the LHC R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: K. Dahlerup-Petersen, A. Siemko, J.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 28-Sep Problems with QPS DAQ Systems During LHC Operation, 1 st Results from 2010 CNRAD Tests R. Denz TE-MPE-CP.
MPE LS1 workshop Summary Session 4 – Quench Detection R. Denz, D. E. Rasmussen.
Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Main MPE Activities during YETS/EYETS/LS2 and the Provision of Resources Andrzej Siemko Andrzej Siemko TE-MPE1.
SUBJECT : DIGITAL ELECTRONICS CLASS : SEM 3(B) TOPIC : INTRODUCTION OF VHDL.
Digital Acquisition: State of the Art and future prospects
Programmable Logic Devices
Design of a polyvalent robust isolated input channel
Outcome of BI.DIS Fast Interlocks Peer Review
Dynamo: A Runtime Codesign Environment
R. Denz, A. Gomez Alonso, AT-MEL-PM
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
Introduction to Programmable Logic
Document Plan & Milestones WP7
Ideas and design concepts, and challenges
Looking back on 2014 and Perspectives for the MPE Group in 2015
The ILC Control Work Packages
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
J. Uythoven for the MPE-MI & MS Teams
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Electronics for Physicists
Magnet Safety System for NA61/Shine
Re-Commissioning (IST) of Electrical Systems: QPS, EE & PIC
LHC BLM system: system overview
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Quench detection electronics for the HL-LHC magnet circuits of the LHC
Maintaining Data Integrity in Programmable Logic in Atmospheric Environments through Error Detection Joel Seely Technical Marketing Manager Military &
Upgrading the Digital Component of the Bunch Current Monitors
Simulation of computer system
PLC Hardware Components.
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Advanced Digital Systems Design Methodology
RF Local Protection System
Electronics for Physicists
Nb3Sn QPS strategies How to protect.
♪ Embedded System Design: Synthesizing Music Using Programmable Logic
Radiation Working Group RADWG
Presentation transcript:

R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: J. Steckert Quench Detection Systems for the Next Generation of Accelerator Magnets R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: J. Steckert

Introduction & motivation Classical superconducting NbTi based accelerator magnets can normally be protected with a fixed set of detection settings allowing as well the use of robust but less flexible technology such as analog bridge detectors. Example MB and MQ protection in LHC In case saturation effects are significant, also classical magnets may require dynamic, current depending detection settings especially in case of limited instrumentation. This approach normally requires the use of a digital detection system. In addition such a system needs a dedicated current sensor. Example 600 A corrector magnet circuit protection in LHC Future Nb3Sn based accelerator magnets by default require dynamic detection settings in order to cope with the specific physics of these magnets. Implementation of this functionality requires a digital system Required user input: threshold voltages, maximum permitted reaction times … Base on past experience it is strongly recommended to develop and test the quench detection systems at an early stage of the magnet testing (as planned now )

Digital quench detection systems The first deployment of digital quench detection systems based on micro-processors dates meanwhile 30 years back (R. Flora et al. @ FNAL 1982) The majority of the LHC quench detection systems are digital Digital systems provide functionalities, which cannot be realized with classical electronics Examples are the protection of 600 A corrector magnet circuits and the aperture symmetric quench protection for LHC main magnets MB and MQ Digital quench detection systems are actually mixed signal systems, where the final decision whether a signal is regarded as a quench or not is taken by a micro-controller or processor, a digital signal processor DSP or in more recent developments by a field programmable gate array FPGA. Detection algorithm is implemented in the device firmware  computer code typically written in C, VHDL (not a programming but a hardware description language) Basic construction elements are the analog input stage, the analog to digital converter, the digital core and the interfaces to interlocks and supervision. The isolation barrier in modern systems is always in the digital signal path. Supersedes designs based on isolation amplifiers

Detection systems for Nb3Sn magnets Proposed solution is a multi-channel digital detection system Two magnet voltages + current Dedicated current sensor required; for accelerator operation this sensor should be redundant (detection system by itself is always redundant) Systems for inner triplet upgrade can be installed in radiation free areas (relocation of present protection systems during LS1) Multi-channel digital detection systems are already used in the LHC for the aperture symmetric quench detection of the LHC main magnets (type DQQDS) System has four isolated input channels and can be easily re-configured System configuration can be change remotely Exploitation requires dedicated supervision application Default for LHC, to be adapted for test bench

Test & deployment strategy As agreed recently QPS will start the deployment of the first digital detection systems for Nb3Sn magnets beginning of 2013 (project engineer in charge is J. Steckert) In the initial phase system will be installed in parallel to the existing systems and be adapted to the respective interlocks A supervision application for the new detection system will be delivered and the test bench operators will be trained accordingly On the mid term the system must be upgraded to an LHC like configuration Separation of protection functionality from test bench DAQ systems Installation of a powering interlock controller (PIC) In collaboration with TE-MPE-MS, M. Zerlauth Deployment of full PIC and QPS supervision layer Timescale to be verified as there are potential conflicts with LS1 activities