MEIC Alternative Design Part III

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Some CEPC SRF considerations
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Comparison of the final focus design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring 2017
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Accelerator and Interaction Region
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC Partial Double Ring Parameter Update
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
Lattice design for double ring scheme of CEPC main ring
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
RHIC Magnets for JLEIC Yuhong Zhang May 11, 2018.
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Deuteron and Small Aperture
The Feasibility of Using RHIC Magnets for MEIC and Cost Impact
The MEIC electron ring as the large ion booster
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Alternative Ion Injector Design
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
Overview Slides for JLEIC Presenters
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
HE-JLEIC Luminosity Estimate
Presentation transcript:

MEIC Alternative Design Part III Ion ring by super-ferric magnets Luminosity performance Improving luminosity at low ion energy (and not be afraid of the hour-glass effect) MEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting Sept. 4, 2014

MEIC Ion Ring by Super-ferric Magnets (2.5 km) Super-ferric only Super-ferric High field SC Maximum kinetic energy GeV 87.6 (100) 100 Dipole length m 9.45 0.75 Dipole maximum field T 2 (2.28) 2 6 Bending radius / angle m / deg 146/3.71° 167/3.24° 55.5 / 0.77° BDL split 100% 81% 19% Dipoles in each arc 74 68 FODO cells in each arc 37 34 Cell length/packing factor 24.3 / 0.78 26.2 / 0.78 Figure-8 crossing angle deg 95° Arc length / radius m / m 899.4 / 187.4 896 / 186.8 Straight length 343.4 342 Ring circumference 2486 2477 Super-ferric magnet 9.45 m, up to 2 T High field magnet 0.75 m, up to 6 T

MEIC Ion Ring by Super-ferric Magnets (2.25 km) Super-ferric only Super-ferric High field SC Maximum kinetic energy GeV 79.5 (100) 100 Dipole length m 9.45 1.53 Dipole maximum field T 2 (2.5) 2 6 Bending radius / angle m / deg 132.5/4.1° 167/3.24° 55.5/1.58° BDL split 100% 67% 33% Dipoles in each arc 66 56 FODO cells in each arc 33 28 Cell length/packing factor 24.3 / 0.78 28.2 / 0.78 Figure-8 crossing angle deg 90° Arc length / radius m / m 801 / 170 789 / 167.5 Straight length 340 334 Ring circumference 2283 2249 Super-ferric magnet 9.45 m, up to 2 T High field magnet 1.5 m, up to 6 T

Luminosity As a Function of Electron Energy Luminosity per IP (1033 cm-2s-1) CM energy (GeV)

Luminosity As a Function of Electron Energy Luminosity per IP (1033 cm-2s-1) CM energy (GeV)

Luminosity As a Function of CM Energy Luminosity per IP (1033 cm-2s-1) CM energy (GeV)

Luminosity & Space Charge at Low Ion Energy Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 25 3 Collision frequency MHz 750 Beam current / particles per bunch A /1010 0.047 / 0.039 3 / 2.5 RMS bunch length cm 1 0.75 Emittance, norm. (x/y) µm 0.35 / 0.07 9.9 / 2.0 Horizontal and vertical β* 10/2 (4/0.2) 77.5/15.5 (31/6.2) Vert. beam-beam tune shift 0.015 Laslett tune shift 0.06 Small Dist. from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 (4.5) 3.5 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 0.22 (0.56) High luminosity  High bunch charge  long bunch length

Slava’s Idea and “Recipe” Long bunch length + traveling final focusing Keep the ion bunch length at the limit due to the space charge, Maintain the ion beta-star possibly short (making it equal to the e- bunch length, optimally, thus it becomes small compared to the i-bunch length) Increase the electron beta-star to the ion bunch length, thus restoring the e- beam transverse area to make it equal to that of the i- beam (that is easy!). Introduce a proper sextupole field to the FFB (final focusing block) of ions. Meaning that the crab cavity is there, sextupole will cause the focal point of ions run through the i-bunch length while following the the e- bunch, in this way integrating collisions of e-bunch through all the i- bunch.

Bunch Length and Hour-Glass Effect M. Furman, LBL-30833, 1999 Hour glass reduction factor Hhg is a slow varying function, this provides a way to exploit luminosity The trick is played in the FCC & CepC proposals: with a fixed aspect ratio, L~Hhg/β*y Circular e+e- collider FCC CepC Z W H tt Bunch length mm 2.56 1.49 1.17 2.42 β*x m 0.5 1 0.8 β*y 1.2 Luminosity reduction Hhg 0.64 0.77 0.83 0.78 0.704

Function Behavior

Luminosity vs. Bunch change/length Full acceptance detector, 25 GeV x 3 GeV Bunch length (cm) Current (mA) Hour-class effect Combined factor Luminosity (1033 cm-2s-1) 1 47 0.977 0.215 2 94 0.944 1.882 0.414 3 141 0.895 2.685 0.591 4 188 0.848 3.392 0.746 5 235 0.803 4.015 0.883 6 282 0.761 4.566 1.005 7 329 0.722 5.054 1.112 8 376 0.686 5.488 1.207 9 423 0.654 5.886 1.295 10 470 0.624 6.24 1.373 Ion beam nominal current ~500 mA

Luminosity vs. Bunch change/length High luminosity detector, 25 GeV x 3 GeV Bunch length (cm) Current (mA) Hour-class effect Combined factor Luminosity (1033 cm-2s-1) 1 47 0.894 0.497 2 94 0.791 1.582 0.880 3 141 0.697 2.091 1.161 4 188 0.620 2.480 1.379 5 235 0.557 2.785 1.548 6 282 0.505 3.030 1.685 7 329 0.462 3.234 1.798 8 376 0.426 3.408 1.895 9 423 0.395 3.555 1.977 10 470 0.368 3.68 2.046 Ion beam nominal current ~500 mA

Hour-glass reduction Factor Hour Glass Reduction Factor Hhg Bunch length (cm)

Luminosity As a Function of Bunch length Luminosity per IP (1033 cm-2s-1) CM energy (GeV)

A Modest(?) Parameter Set at Low Ion Energy Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 25 3 Collision frequency MHz 750 Current / particles per bunch A /1010 0.047/0.039 3 / 2.5 0.188/0.156 RMS bunch length cm 1 0.75 6 Emittance, norm. (x/y) µm 0.35 / 0.07 9.9 / 2.0 Horizontal and vertical β* 10/2 (4/0.2) 77.5/15.5 (31/6.2) Vert. beam-beam tune shift 0.015 Laslett tune shift 0.06 Small 0.04 Dist. from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 (4.5) 3.5 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 0.22 (0.56) 0.67 (1.13) Increase the bunch length from 1 cm to 6 cm Increase the bunch charge a factor of 4 Reduce the space charge tune-shift from 0.6 to 0.4