Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Co-Teaching as a Model of Student Teaching: Common Trends and Levels of Student Engagement Co-Teaching as a Model of Student Teaching: Common Trends and.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Susan Malone Mercer University.  “The unit has taken effective steps to eliminate bias in assessments and is working to establish the fairness, accuracy,
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
Ohhhhh, Christopher Robin, I am not the right one for this job... The House on Pooh Corner, A.A. Milne.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Navigating Murky Waters The Challenge of Assessing Preservice Teacher Dispositions Dr. Anne B. Bucalos and Dr. Christine G. Price Bellarmine University.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
 Field Experience Evaluations PSU Special Educator Programs Confidence... thrives on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Teaching Commons Brown Bag Lunch Series: Holistic Course Design Teaching Commons November 13, 2012.
Rubrics, and Validity, and Reliability: Oh My! Pre Conference Session The Committee on Preparation and Professional Accountability AACTE Annual Meeting.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Data Conventions and Analysis: Focus on the CAEP Self-Study
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
EVALUATING EPP-CREATED ASSESSMENTS
Understanding VPNPP Scoring Descriptors
Polices, procedures & protocols
The New Learning Needs Analysis Tool
Partnership for Practice
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
Conducting Pre- and Post-Conferences
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Pre-service Teacher Tracker Workshop
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
Associate Teacher Meeting 16 June 2009
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
CEA Case Study Marianne Farrugia.
Curriculum Structures
Technology Assessment Training
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Information and Guidelines booklets
Welcome to the School of Education
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
EDA: Educator Disposition Assessment
Demonstration Teaching
Resident Educator Program
William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Preparing for CAEP Accreditation: Standard 2
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
TAPTM System Overview Teacher Excellence Student Achievement
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST* Form) Developed by the VARI-EPP* Collaboration *Valid and Reliable Instruments for Educator Preparation Programs *CPAST = Candidate Preservice Assessment of Student Teaching, used during student teaching.

Learning Objectives In this chapter, you will: Learn the Advanced Field Experience Form: Sections, Levels of Performance, Formatting, Scoring, and Resources Learn the purpose of the Three-Way Conference Learn the timing of the Three-Way Conference Learn how to prepare for the Three-Way Conference Examine examples of interactions that may occur during the Conference

Advanced Field Experience Form Sections: Pedagogy & Dispositions 10 rows 4 subsections Dispositions 4 rows 3 subsections The Form rows are aligned to OSTP, CAEP, & InTASC Standards

Advanced Field Experience Form: Row Structure There are three levels of performance

What if the consensus score is ‘Does not meet’ or ‘Emerging’on a row? A consensus score of ‘Does not meet’ or ‘Emerging’ alerts the team that the teacher candidate: •Needs to focus on that specific area during their future student teaching; and •Needs support and resources from the university supervisor and cooperating teacher during their future student teaching. Support Example Suggesting resources Readings, articles Reflection questions Post conference questions related to the area for improvement Providing opportunities For the student teacher to demonstrate competence Co-teaching To model and support

Advanced Field Placement Form Formatting: AND/OR, Lists A teacher candidate must provide evidence for ALL descriptors in a level of performance in order to earn the column rating. This short video explains the use of enumerated lists in the Form’s Rows. (Note: The example is from the Candidate Preservice Assessment of Student Teaching [CPAST] Form) https://youtu.be/YDkqfZtONos If a teacher candidate consistently “Demonstrates collaborative relationships with the CT…” But does not “Attempt to work with and learn from colleagues…” He or she should not earn “Meets Expectations” on this row.

Advanced Field Placement Form Scoring: Special Notes A score of “not applicable” is not an option for any row

Advanced Field Placement Form Resources: “Look Fors” Document The Look Fors document is intended to assist the teacher candidate, cooperating teacher and university supervisor in determining a score and provide suggestions for possible sources of evidence, as well as further elaboration of the characteristics for each level of performance. WHY is it used? The ‘Look Fors’ document is intended to: reduce confusion; and promote inter-rater reliability of the form (i.e., all users are using the form to evaluate candidates the same way).

What is the Three-Way Conference? The meeting Includes the university supervisor, the cooperating teacher (mentor), and the teacher candidate; Ensures the perspectives of each member of the team are taken into consideration when evaluating the teacher candidate using the Advanced Field Placement Form; Occurs at the end of the semester. The Three-Way Conference

How should each participant prepare for the conference? Each team member involved in the evaluation process should bring: a suggested score evidence to support his/her score In addition to self-assessing his/her progress the Teacher Candidate should: complete the “Goals” section of the Advanced Field Placement Form refine his/her goals after discussing them with the US and CT at the Three-Way Conference

Let’s look at what conversations may look like in two mock Three-Way Conferences. Note: Examples are focused on a Student Teaching Experience. Situation Website Link Example #1: A team member indicating s/he has not had an opportunity to observe the teacher candidate demonstrating evidence for a specific skill https://youtu.be/A39KGYMjYlQ Example #2: The teacher candidate indicating he has not had the opportunity to demonstrate a particular skill https://youtu.be/VMJT738RMyw

This is the end of the training chapter This is the end of the training chapter. Thank you for taking the time to review the content. If you have any questions, please consult a University Supervisor or your program contact for more details. We wish you a successful semester!