JLEIC CCR Path Length and Gap Formation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

Some Timing Aspects for ILC Heiko Ehrlichmann DESY GDE, Frascati, December 2005.
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Harmonic.
F D F November 8, 2006Alessandro G. Ruggiero1 of GeV 10-MWatt Proton Driver Target 200-MeV DTL 1.0-GeV FFAG H – Stripping Foil Injection Energy,
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
Progress Report on the Ultra-fast Harmonic Kicker Cavity Design and Beam Dynamic Simulation Yulu Huang 1,2 H. Wang 1, R. A. Rimmer 1, S. Wang 1 1.Thomas.
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
JLEIC Ion Integration Update
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Cornell Injector Performance
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
PEPPo Based Polarized Positron Beam Formation for JLEIC
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Summary of Beam Cooling Parallel Session
JLEIC electron injection demo
JLEIC electron injection demo
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Gap Transient Suppression using Increased Bunch Density
Injector for the Electron Cooler
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
H. Wang1, R. A. Rimmer1, S. Wang1, J. Guo1
12 Steps to a Cooler Design
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Synchronization in MEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Technical challenges for forming the double intensity section of JLEIC ion beam Jiquan Guo.
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Fast kicker beam dynamics simulations
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
Presentation transcript:

JLEIC CCR Path Length and Gap Formation Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Rev Apr 5, 2018

CCR Definitions E1 K2 K1 Points: Harmonic Number of CCR NhCCR K1: center of injection harmonic kicker Circumference of CCR divided by βERLλERL K2: Center of extraction harmonic kicker In the current design βERLλERL≡0.31464m constant for 20-55MeV cooler with 952.6MHz ERL cavities E1: entrance of the ERL linac Path lengths Sometimes (if noted) Nh refer to the circumference divided by bunch spacing L1: path length from K1 to K2 Frequency range 952.6360.133MHz, β range 0.99969-0.99996 L2: K2 to K1 L3: E1 to K1 Number of CCR turns Nt L4: K2 to E1 How many times a electron bunch passes through the cooling section before extraction L1+L2 = CCR circumference

Requirement between NhCCR and Nt (1) K2 timing is L2/ ahead of K1. Assume K2 turns on at t=(0+n×Nt)×Tbucket, K1 turns on at t=(L2/+n×Nt)×Tbucket, n=0,1,2,3… A bunch injected at K1 at time L2/×Tbucket . The bunch arrives K2 at NhCCR×Tbucket after 1st turn, and n×NhCCR×Tbucket after n turns. When n×NhCCR is a multiple of Nt, the bunch is ejected To let the bunch circulate Nt turns, Nt must be co-prime with NhCCR If each bunch circulates Nt turns, and Tinj/Tbucket=Nt, the bunches will fill the CCR Extracted bunches K2 Nh,CCR=20 Tinj/Tb=Nt=3 Tinj Injecting bunches K1 Tb Tk

Requirement between NhCCR and Nt (1) If Nh,CCR and Tinj/Tb have a max common factor M, the bunch can only circulate for Tinj/Tb/M turns; only 1/M of buckets can be filled (should avoid) Extracted bunches Nh,CCR=18 Tinj/Tb=3 M=3 Nt=1 Tinj Injecting bunches Tb Tk

Nh,CCR and Nt, reduced reprate operation To have both CCR and source running at reduced reprate (only 1/N of the buckets are filled, N=Tinj/Tk=Tbunch/Tbucket) Nt=Tinj/Tbunch=Tkicker/Tbucket still needs to be co-prime of Nh,CCR Nh,CCR needs to be multiple of all possible ratio of N; otherwise, if Nc is the max common factor of Nh,CCR and N, 1/Nc of the CCR buckets will be filled (factor of N/Nc more than required), but only during part (Nc /N) of the time Extracted bunches Nh,CCR=20 Tinj/Tbunch=Nt=3 Tinj/Tk= Tbunch/Tbucket =2 Tinj Tbunch Tbucket Tk

Nh,CCR and Nt, reduced reprate operation It will be nice to choose a prime number for Nt, so it poses less restriction on the choice of NhCCR and N Nt=11 was suggest by A. Hutton, previously thought about 20, 10, 12 Nt=11 for 952.6MHz makes cavities easier to build (than 476MHz), and makes future upgrade to 952.6MHz bunch rep-rate in the CCR possible

NhCCR vs Nt, exact cancelation of kicker slope Y. Huang, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 084201 A circulating bunch kicked by K2 with slope needs to be compensated by K1 in the following kick with same slope and (2n+1)π betatron phase advance, assuming K1/K2 kicking direction is the same (both upward or both downward). Failure to match the sequence of the two kickers’ slope will result in significant emittance growth of the cooling electron beam. NhCCR=M×Nt+Δ. Is there any restriction on Δ? Figure above shows that the cases of Δ=1 and 3 will have perfect cancelation Actually as long as we arrange the K2 kick out pulse right ahead of K1 kick in pulse, we will have the perfect cancelation. For the kicker slope cancelation issue, no further restriction on choice of Δ if Nh,CCR and Nt=Tinj/Tb are co-prime

Ion Trapping For CW bunched beam Providing typical CCR parameters, ion trapping will be a problem for CCR 𝑁 𝑏 =2× 10 10 , 𝐿 𝑠𝑒𝑝 =0.63 to 2.52m, 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ≈12m, 𝜖 𝑔𝑥,𝑦 =10nm, 𝜎 𝑥,𝑦 ≈0.35mm 𝐴 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝 =0.04 ~ 0.16≪1 It seems like a gap is mandatory Rui Li, Mar 2018 JLEIC coll meeting

Forming gaps in CCR for Ion Clearing etc For each missing bunch in ERL accelerating beam, the CCR will keep the bunch missing for Nt=11 turns Trying to match CCR gap with the ion ring gap is impossible and unnecessary It’s possible to have a gap of ~100ns for each turn in CCR The other option is to ramp down the ERL current to 0 in a long gap (needs a few ms, which is a few times of the total stored beam energy of ~50J divided by the ERL klystron power of ~100kW), possible to work if ion trapping accumulation time will be more than 100ms (probably not the case for CCR).

Forming a gap per turn in CCR ERL’s 3.2nC charge per bunch is huge, and mismatch of one pair acc-deacc bunches in the bunch train might cause non-negligible gradient droop If a ~100ns gap in the deacc bunch followed by one acc bunch, it must ends with an acc bunch following a deacc bunch, and all the following gaps should do the same. A single bunch mismatch will cause at least a difference of ~0.13% in the energy of the two acc bunch trains (twice the 0.06% energy spread specs); correcting this transient by feed-forward requires multi-MW level pulsed RF power, which is not practical We must have a supercycle of injection bunch train with length in the range of the ERL path length  1 bunch spacing, so the acc/deacc bunch train will overlap in the ERL, which basically eliminates the transient beam loading in the ERL linac ERL path length = Nt×(L1+L2)+L3+L4-L2 ≈ (Nt+1) ×(L1+L2) [~12×CCR circumference] We need to have one gap for each injection bunch train from ERL (bunch train length ≈CCR circumference). If this gap is generated by laser, it will produce serious transient beam loading in the gun and the booster cavities. We should either generate the gap by kicking some bunches out with harmonic kickers, or compensate the transient with RF feed-forward. ERL linac starts with gaps from each ERL injection bunch train aligned in the CCR NhCCR=M×Nt+Δ, Δ needs to be co-prime to Nt Δ=1 gives perfect gaps, if bunch train for each turn of CCR injection has a length of M×Nt, and ERL path length range within (Nt+1) × M×Nt Nt The case of Δ=2 will form a step in the gap; larger Δ will form multi gaps.

Gap forming with NhCCR=Δ+M×Nt, Δ=1 NhCCR=Δ+M×Nt=320, Nt=11, M=29, Δ=1 # of train 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Start bucket 320 319 318 317 316 315 314 313 312 310 309 2nd bucket 3rd bucket 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 … End bucket 264 274 273 272 271 270 269 268 267 266 265 Gap 265-308 Injector will have 43.3MHz (952.6/22) bunch trains, with 25 bunches and 4 empty buckets in each train Assumes the gaps in the injector is periodical, i.e., for case of Nhccr=320, the period is 319 buckets (11×29). The supercycle will be 12×319 buckets A sharp gap will be formed in such case

Gaps and ERL path length, NhCCR=Δ+M×Nt, Δ=1 Assumes Nhccr=320, and the CCR has 11 turns (plus ~1 turn for ERL) To minimize transient beam loading, the 1st bunch train needs to return to the ERL cavity for de-acceleration at about the same timing of 13th bunch train for acceleration, and the difference has to be odd multiple of ½ wavelength of 31cm (1/4 CCR bunch spacing of 63cm), and smaller than 11 RF buckets of 952MHz, considering future upgrade of 952.6MHz operation. As a result, the ERL path length (=11×L1+10×L2+L3+L4 ≈12×(L1+L2)) should be in the range of 7656(=638*12)10.5 wavelengths of 952.6MHz. Pattern repeats every 638 952.6MHz cycles ~1 turn in CCR

Injected bunch time structure Assumes CCR operates at 476MHz and the injection is at 43.3MHz Forming the source bunch pattern for NhCCR=320, bunch rep-rate 43.3MHz 25 bunches Period of 29 gap=4 T (in unit of 23.094ns)

Gap forming with NhCCR=Δ+M×Nt, Δ=2 # of train 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Start bucket 332 330 328 326 324 322 320 318 316 314 312 2nd bucket 331 329 327 325 323 3rd bucket 22 20 18 16 14 12 2nd last 264 262 260 258 256 254 252 250 248 246 244 End bucket 275 273 271 269 267 265 263 261 259 257 255 Full gap 276-309, half gap 313-321, 266-275 In general, the rise/fall time of the beam current in the CCR gap will be ∆ −1 ×𝑁𝑡×bunch spacing.

Reduced bunch rep-rate operation We need to consider the case of reduced bunch rep-rate operation for JLEIC and the CCR There might be 3 ways to generate reduce rep-rate bunches in the CCR with gaps 1. change the CCR circumference when we need to change the rep-rate, maintains Δ=1. For example, when CCR bunch rep-rate is at 119MHz, we can choose harmonic number of 78 (C=196.338m); at 238MHz, we choose Nh=155 (C=195.080m); at 476MHz, Nh=309 (C=194.45m) 2. choose the harmonic number to optimize the lowest rep-rate case (Nh=78/156/312), and live with the long rise time of the gap for 476MHz case (if we choose to remove 4 out every 28 bunches, we won’t have a 0 current gap) 3. Choose optimal harmonic number for higher rep-rate (476MHz), i.e. Nh=320. In this case, the periodicity of the bunch train of 319 buckets can’t be preserved for low rep-rate, but we still need to preserve the periodicity of every 11 bunch trains (3520 buckets) Might be more difficult for generating the gap in the source/booster (laser rise/fall time, booster transient beam loading, etc). In the cases with periodicity of 28 buckets (of 43.3MHz) in the injector bunch train, we can generate CW beam in the source and transfer through the booster, use kickers to kick out 4 of every 28 bunches.

NhCCR=320 with reduced bunch rep-rate Assumes we operate at 119MHz bunch rep-rate in CCR. Injects bunches in 476/44MHz, or 10.825MHz, every 92.375ns. Each injected bunch train has 6 or 7 bunches, and 1 empty bunch between bunch trains. Totally 25 filled bunches for every 4 bunch trains (2.679μs), in a pattern of 7, 6, 6, 6. 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 1 ERL supercycle =3 laser cycles = 8.047μs =ERL path length 10.5 =12×(CCR circumference-Δ) Period of 29 gap=4

Possible NhCCR choices Nh (476MHz) C (m) Adjustable, optimized for 119-952MHz differently 308.5-312 194.14-196.34 11*7*4+1~4 352.5-356 221.82-224.03 11*8*4+1~4 Optimized for 476MHz, Will work in 119MHz/238MHz 320 201.37 11×29+1, 23×14-2 340 213.96 11×31-1, 4×5×17 364 229.06 11×33+1, 4×7×13 384 241.6 11×35-1, 128×3 Optimized at 119MHz, gap rise/fall time will be long for 238/476MHz 312 196.34 356 224.03 After discussion with Shukui about the capability to generate the laser pattern shown in page 16, I believe the NhCCR requirements 4N AND 11M1 will be the best choice, leaving us a few options, 320, 340, 364 and 384. Gradient droop in the booster could still be challenging. The feed-forward needs to take action every ~0.7μs (with unequal spacing). However, the bunch pattern is also possible to be generated with CW beam in the booster if we have a kicker repeats at 1.49MHz and flat top of ~92.375ns