A Light-Independent Allele of Phytochrome B Faithfully Recapitulates Photomorphogenic Transcriptional Networks  Wei Hu, Yi-Shin Su, J. Clark Lagarias 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Histone H3 Lysine-27 Methyltransferase Complex Represses Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis thaliana  Gu Xiaofeng , Xu Tongda , He Yuehui   Molecular.
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Diverse Transcriptional Programs Associated with Environmental Stress and Hormones in the Arabidopsis Receptor-Like Kinase Gene Family  Lee Chae, Sylvia.
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
HIS-24 regulates expression of infection-inducible genes.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Spatiotemporal Brassinosteroid Signaling and Antagonism with Auxin Pattern Stem Cell Dynamics in Arabidopsis Roots  Juthamas Chaiwanon, Zhi-Yong Wang 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Photoreceptor-Mediated Bending towards UV-B in Arabidopsis
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Luo Chongyuan , Durgin Brittany G. , Watanabe Naohide , Lam Eric  
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
A Truncated Arabidopsis NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1, AtNAP1;3T, Alters Plant Growth Responses to Abscisic Acid and Salt in the Atnap1;3-2 Mutant  Liu.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
High-Resolution Expression Map of the Arabidopsis Root Reveals Alternative Splicing and lincRNA Regulation  Song Li, Masashi Yamada, Xinwei Han, Uwe Ohler,
The RdDM Pathway Is Required for Basal Heat Tolerance in Arabidopsis
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
H3K36 Methylation Is Involved in Promoting Rice Flowering
Expression of a microRNA-Resistant Target Transgene Misrepresents the Functional Significance of the Endogenous microRNA: Target Gene Relationship  Junyan.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Kneissl Julia , Shinomura Tomoko , Furuya Masaki , Bolle Cordelia  
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Phytochrome Signaling in Green Arabidopsis Seedlings: Impact Assessment of a Mutually Negative phyB–PIF Feedback Loop  Pablo Leivar, Elena Monte, Megan.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
SWR1 Chromatin-Remodeling Complex Subunits and H2A
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis  Yulong Wang, Yiqing Wang,
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Deciphering the Innate Lymphoid Cell Transcriptional Program
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Anne Pfeiffer, Hui Shi, James M. Tepperman, Yu Zhang, Peter H. Quail 
Brassinosteroids Regulate the Differential Growth of Arabidopsis Hypocotyls through Auxin Signaling Components IAA19 and ARF7  Xiao-Yi Zhou, Li Song,
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (March 2013)
MAX2 Affects Multiple Hormones to Promote Photomorphogenesis
Thermomorphogenesis in seedling organs is autonomous or interdependent
Identification of Primary Target Genes of Phytochrome Signaling
A Novel System for Xylem Cell Differentiation in Arabidopsis thaliana
1O2-Mediated and EXECUTER-Dependent Retrograde Plastid-to-Nucleus Signaling in Norflurazon-Treated Seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana  Chanhong Kim, Klaus.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Roles of Defense Hormones in the Regulation of Ozone-Induced Changes in Gene Expression and Cell Death  Enjun Xu, Lauri Vaahtera, Mikael Brosché  Molecular.
Chitin‐induced callose deposition in the mapkkk5 mutants
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
DET1 and COP1 Modulate the Coordination of Growth and Immunity in Response to Key Seasonal Signals in Arabidopsis  Sreeramaiah N. Gangappa, S. Vinod Kumar 
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
DNA Damage-Induced Transcription of Transposable Elements and Long Non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis Is Rare and ATM-Dependent  Zhenxing Wang, Rainer Schwacke,
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Linking Chloroplast Antioxidant Defense to Carbohydrate Availability: The Transcript Abundance of Stromal Ascorbate Peroxidase Is Sugar-Controlled via.
Abscisic Acid, High-Light, and Oxidative Stress Down-Regulate a Photosynthetic Gene via a Promoter Motif Not Involved in Phytochrome-Mediated Transcriptional.
Presentation transcript:

A Light-Independent Allele of Phytochrome B Faithfully Recapitulates Photomorphogenic Transcriptional Networks  Wei Hu, Yi-Shin Su, J. Clark Lagarias  Molecular Plant  Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 166-182 (January 2009) DOI: 10.1093/mp/ssn086 Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Constitutive Photomorphogenic Phenotype of YHB Seedlings. (A) Morphology comparison of 4-day-old seedlings grown in darkness or under different fluence rates of continuous red light (Rc). (B) Hypocotyl lengths (mean ± S.D.) of 4-day-old seedlings of different genotypes (n  =  40∼60). (C–F) TEM micrographs of an etioplast of dark-grown wild type (C), of a chloroplast of light-grown wild type (D), and of an etioplast from dark-grown YHB seedlings ((E) and (F); (F) is a close-up view of (E)). Scale bars  =  1.0 μm. Molecular Plant 2009 2, 166-182DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssn086) Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Microarray Analysis Shows Significant Misregulation of the Arabidopsis Genome by YHB. (A) Number of statistically significant two-fold (SSTF) regulated genes in dark-grown YHB (YHB–D), in dark-grown phyAphyB double mutants (phyAphyB–D), in Ler wild type grown under 15 μmol m−2 s−1 (WT–Rc15) or 50 μmol m−2 s−1 (WT–Rc50), and in YHB grown under 50 μmol m−2 s−1 (YHB–Rc50) compared with dark-grown Ler wild type (WT–D). (B) Venn diagrams show pairwise comparison of SSTF-regulated genes with percentage values indicating the proportion of shared genes for each expression profile. (C, D) Venn diagrams show comparison among three different sets of SSTF-regulated genes. Molecular Plant 2009 2, 166-182DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssn086) Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of 3889 Core YHB- and Rc-Regulated Genes Reveals Great Overlap of Expression Pattern. White dots indicate absolute maximum of expression change for each gene among the five experimental treatments described in Figure 2. Vertical gray bars at the right side mark gene sets with similar trend of expression change between YHB–D and Rc-grown seedlings. Solid black bars illustrate two gene sets differentially regulated by YHB and Rc. Some representative genes are indicated in the map. The numerical values for the green-to-magenta gradient bar (bottom) represent log2-fold change relative to WT–D, with induction represented in magenta and repression represented in green. Molecular Plant 2009 2, 166-182DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssn086) Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 YHB-Dependent Misregulation of Gene Expression Is Globally Attenuated by Red Light. Among the total of 1861 genes with comparative expression changes in both dark- and Rc-grown YHB seedlings, (A) 914 genes showed significant up-regulation, while (B) 947 genes showed significant down-regulation; expression for four experimental treatments was normalized to YHB–D and sorted by YHB–Rc50. Expression validation of two representative YHB-induced genes (C) and two representative YHB-repressed genes (D) are shown. Slashed bars  =  microarray measurement; solid bars  =  qRT–PCR measurement. Treatment codes include: 1  =  WT–D, 2  =  phyAphyB–D, 3  =  YHB–D, 4  =  WT–Rc15, 5  =  WT–Rc50, and 6  =  YHB–Rc50. Molecular Plant 2009 2, 166-182DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssn086) Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Class-1 YHB-Regulated Genes Show a Striking Pattern of Attenuation by Red Light. (A) Integrated expression patterns of YHB-induced and repressed genes that were attenuated by Rc (see Supplemental Table 4 for list of genes shown). Expression validation of seven representative YHB-induced genes (B) and two representative YHB-repressed genes (C) are shown. CAB gene expression is inconsistent between two measurements and thus is plotted with two axes. The legend for the relative expression in (B) and (C) is same as Figure 4C and 4D. Molecular Plant 2009 2, 166-182DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssn086) Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Class-2 YHB-Regulated Genes Show Almost Complete Attenuation by Red Light while Expression of Class-3 Red Light-Regulated Genes Is YHB-Independent. (A) Integrated induced and repressed expression patterns for Class-2 genes (see Supplemental Table 4 for list of genes shown). (B) Integrated induced and repressed expression patterns for Class-3 genes (see Supplemental Table 4 for list of genes shown). (C–E) Expression validation of one YHB–D-induced gene (C), two YHB–D repressed genes (D), and one Rc-specific induced gene (E). The legend for the relative expression in (C)–(E) is the same as in Figure 4C and 4D. Molecular Plant 2009 2, 166-182DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssn086) Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions