SUPREME COURT PROJECT 1st Amendment Freedoms: Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition

NATIONALIZED THE 1ST AMENDMENT MADE THE 1ST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS APPLY TO THE STATES THRU THE 14TH AMENDMENT’S DUE PROCESS CLAUSE Gitlow v. New York, 1925 Near v. Minnesota, 1931 DeJonge v. Oregon, 1937 Cantwell v. Connecticut, 1940

Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 1925 Everson v. Board of Ed, 1947 THE FOLLOWING CASES HAVE BEEN USED TO INTERPRET THE 1ST AMENDMENT’S FREEDOM OF RELIGION’S ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 1925 Everson v. Board of Ed, 1947 Zorach v. Clauson, 1952 Engel v. Vital, 1962 Abbington School District v. Schempp, 1963 Epperson v. Arkansas, 1968

CONTINUE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE Lemon v. Kurtzman, 1971 Marsh v. Chambers, 1983 Wallace v. Jaffree, 1985 Edwards v. Aguillard, 1987 Westside Community v. Mergens, 1990 Sante Fe Independent School District v Doe, 2000

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 1905 THE FOLLOWING SUPREME COURT CASES WERE USED TO INTERPRET THE 1ST AMENDMENT’S FREEDOM OF RELIGION’S FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE Reynolds v. U.S. , 1879 Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 1905 West Virginia Board of Ed. v. Barnette, 1943 Welsh v. U.S., 1970 Wisconsin v. Yoder, 1972 Oregon v. Smith, 1990 City of Boerne, Texas v. Flores, 1997

Cases used to interpret the 1st Amendment’s: Freedom of Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition New York Times v. U.S., 1971 Greer v. Spock, 1976 Snepp v. U.S., 1980 Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeir, 1988 Thornburgh v. Abbott, 1989

Freedom of Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition Branzburg v. Hayes, 1972 Burnstyn v. Wilson, 1952 U.S. v. O’Brien, 1968 Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 1969 Schenck v. U.S., 1919 Texas v. Johnson, 1989 U.S. v. Eichman, 1990

Freedom of Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition Cox v. New Hampshire, 1941 Gregory v. Chicago, 1969 Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner, 1972