1. Tuesday April 28, 2015 Mr. Goblirsch – American Government
OBJECTIVE – Students Will Be Able To – SWBAT:
- Analyze an assigned 1st Amendment Supreme Court case.
AGENDA:
WARM-UP: Chrome Book Distribution
DIRECTIONS: 1st Amendment Presentation
TASK: Create 1st Amendment Presentation
*****PARTNERS: Amendment Flyer – DUE THURSDAY
***HW DUE TODAY – Jury Duty Interviews***
Chrome Book Distribution WARM-UP: (Follow the directions below)
***5 minutes***
Chrome Books will be distributed. DO NOT OPEN UP OR LOG-IN TO YOUR CHROME BOOK YET!!!

2. 1st AMENDMENT “Congress shall make no law:
(1a.) respecting an establishment of religion, or
(1b.) prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or
(2.) abridging the freedom of speech, or
(3.) of the press; or
(4.) the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and
(5.) to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

3. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASES

4. 1st Amendment Freedoms
DIRECTIONS: Create a brief PowerPoint presentation about your assigned Supreme Court case. Use the template below. Slide 1 – TITLE SLIDE - Freedom of ______ – “Quote from Constitution Slide 2 – Case Background/Summary & Issue Slide 3 – Case Court Decision/Impact & Your Opinion

5. Slide #1 Freedom of ________
Case : ___________ v. ____________
“Quote from 1st Amendment”
Picture(s)

6. Slide #2
PICTURE
Background/Summary:
Issue:

7. Slide #3
PICTURE
Court’s Decision/Impact:
Your Opinion:

8. Possible Websites to Use
Supremecourt.gov
Justia.com
Oyez.org
Law.cornell.edu
FirstAmendmentSchools.org
UScourts.gov

9. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Everson v. Board of Ed. (1947)

10. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Engel v. Vitale (1962)

11. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000)

12. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Good News Club v. Milford Central School (2001)

13. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)

14. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)

15. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

16. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Establishment
CASE: Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

17. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Free Exercise
CASE: Reynolds v. U.S. (1879)

18. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Free Exercise
CASE: Oregon v. Smith (1990)

19. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Religion – Free Exercise
CASE: West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette (1943)

20. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Schenck v. U.S. (1919)

21. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: U.S. v. Eichman (1990)

22. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: U.S. v. O’Brien (1968)

23. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

24. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Bethel School District v. Fraser (1986)

25. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Yates v. U.S. (1957)

26. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Gitlow v. New York (1925)

27. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Buckley v. Valeo (1976)

28. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: Near v. Minnesota (1931)

29. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: NY Times v. U.S. (1971)

30. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966)

31. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)

32. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)

33. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: National Broadcasting Co. v. U.S. (1943)

34. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC (1969)

35. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Press
CASE: Miller v. California (1973)

36. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Assembly
CASE: Hill v. Colorado (2000)

37. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Assembly
CASE: Gregory v. Colorado (1969)

38. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Assembly
CASE: Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner (1972)

39. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Assembly
CASE: Feiner v. New York (1951)

40. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Assembly
CASE: Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)

41. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Speech
CASE: Morse v. Frederick (2007)

42. 1st AMENDMENT COURT CASE
TOPIC: Assembly
CASE: Madsen v. Women’s Health Services Inc. (1994)

44. Group #1 Religion – Establishment – Prayer Engel v. Vitale (1962)
Abington School District v. Schemp (1963)
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000)
Westside Community Schools v. Mergens
Vocab terms – Establishment Clause, precedent

45. Group #2 Religion – Establishment – Parochial Schools
Everson v. Board of Ed. (1947)
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
Mueller v. Allen (1983)
Mitchell v. Helms (2000)
Vocab terms – Parochial school, secular

46. Group #3 Religion – Establishment – Evolution
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)
Lynch v. Donnelly (1984)
County of Allegheny v. ACLU (1989)
Vocab terms – N/A

47. Group #4 Religion – Free Exercise Reynolds v. U.S. (1879)
Oregon v. Smith (1990)
City of Boerne, Texas v. Flores (1997)
Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette (1943)
Vocab terms – Free exercise clause, abridge

48. Group #5 Speech - Symbolic U.S. v. O’Brien (1968)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
U.S. v. Eichman (1990)
Hill v. Colorado (2000)
Vocab terms – Pure Speech, Symbolic speech

49. Group #6 Speech – Limits Schenck v. U.S. (1919) Gitlow v. N.Y. (1925)
Yates v. U.S. (1957)
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Vocab terms – Seditious speech, Bad tendency doctrine (P. 368), Preferred position doctrine (P. 368)

50. Group #7 Speech – Not Protected NY Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
Chapinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
Bethel School District v. Fraser (1986)
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
Vocab terms – Defamatory speech, slander, libel

51. Group #8 Press Neal v. Minnesota (1931) NY Times Co. v. U.S. (1971)
Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966)
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976)
Vocab terms – prior restraint, sequestered, gag order, shield laws

52. Group #9 Press - TV Turner Broadcasting System Inc. v. FCC (1997)
U.S. v. Playboy (2000)
Burstyn v. Wilson (1952)
Vocab terms – Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (P. 374)

53. Group #10 Press Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997)
Miller v. California (1973)
Bigelow v. Virginia (1975)
Vocab terms – N/A

54. Group #11 Assembly DeJonge v. Oregon (1937)
Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)
Grayned v. City of Rockford (1972)
Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley (1972)
Vocab terms – assembly, picketing

55. Group #12 Assembly Feiner v. New York (1950)
Gregory v. City of Chicago (1969)
Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner (1972)
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York (1997)
Vocab terms – N/A

56. Group #13 Assembly Thornhill v. Alabama (1940)
Hughes v. Superior Court (1950)
Whitney v. California (1927)
Dennis v. U.S. (1951)
Vocab terms – Association, Clear and Present danger doctrine (P. 382)

57. 1st Amendment Supreme Court Cases
NAME:
DATE: PERIOD:
Case: Schenck v. United States (1919)
Plaintiff’s Issue:
Schenck, prints Anti-war pamphlets and sends to drafted war soldiers
Court’s Decision / Impact:
Congress can enact a law to limit free speech if it protects the citizens & the national security. “clear & present danger”
Case: Feiner v. New York (1951)
Denounces government officials and “urged blacks to rise up in arms”
Upheld his conviction, when “clear and present danger” of riot, the state can prevent and punish
Case: Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
KKK leader makes a statement on TV, threatened President, Congress, and Supreme Court w/ revenge
Ohio’s law was unconstitutional, statement can’t be considered as enticing action, he acted w/in his 1st Amendment Right.
Case: Gregory v. Chicago (1969)
Gregory organizes a protest march in an all-white neighborhood. Crowd becomes hostile
Protesters had been deprived of their 1st amendment right. No evidence of disorderly conduct

58. 1st Amendment Supreme Court Cases
NAME:
DATE: PERIOD:
Case: NY Times v. United States (1971)
Plaintiff’s Issue:
Copied “pentagon papers” and gave to NY times to print. Federal government temporarily halted printing of papers
Court’s Decision / Impact:
Court found that actions fell under prior restraint and therefore unconstitutional. NY times allowed to print.
Case: Bethel School District v. Fraser (1986)
Student gave speech including explicit sexual metaphors. Crowd began simulating sexual activites.
School has authority to discipline students for lewd or indecent speech. School is responsible for preparing responsible citizens

59. 3rd Period FINAL PROJECT
PRESENATION SCHEDULE
WEDNESDAY
May 27th
THURSDAY
May 28th
FRIDAY
May 29th
1st – Brett & Zach
1st – Ashley & Angelina
1st – Maria & Stephanie C.
2nd – Justina & Maria
2nd – Toni & Sylvia
2nd - Andrea
3rd – Lilly & Kim
3rd – Stephanie W. & Ivan
3rd – Christian H. & Lupe
4th – Raul & Jonathan
4th – Juan & Brian
4th - Caitlyn
5th -
5th - Ramon
5th – Jose & Armando
6th -
6th – Kristian W.
6th – Juli
7th – Hector & Alicia
7th -
7th – Julian & Jasmien

60. 4th Period FINAL PROJECT
PRESENATION SCHEDULE
WEDNESDAY
May 27th
THURSDAY
May 28th
FRIDAY
May 29th
1st - Jonathan
1st -
1st – Ramon & Jesus
2nd – Jasmine A. & Illene
2nd – Jennifer & Chris
2nd – Lili & Casidy
3rd - Vanessa
3rd – Tino & Ashley
3rd – Savannah & Perla
4th – Lucy & Jennifer L.
4th - Alicia
4th - Maite
5th – Jasmine N. & Diana
5th – Cristian & John
5th – Elizabeth & Arvinder
6th – Ricky & Jaskaran
6th – Brandon & Jose
6th - Susana
7th - Lesley
7th - Rafael
7th -

61. 5th Period FINAL PROJECT
PRESENATION SCHEDULE
WEDNESDAY
May 27th
THURSDAY
May 28th
FRIDAY
May 29th
1st -
1st – Andrew & Gabby
1st – Leo & Tristan
2nd – Rafael R.
2nd – Esai & Caleb
2nd – Jose & Ernesto P.
3rd - Rudy
3rd – Victor & Elizabeth
3rd – Miranda & Hilsa
4th - David
4th - Alexis
4th – Fatima & Genesis
5th - Hailey
5th – Manuel & Maria
5th – Erasmo & Ernesto G.
6th – Kyndall & Chris
6th – Christian & Rafael A.
6th – Alex & Jesus
7th – Cynthia & Kime
7th – Izaiah & Oscar
7th – Eduardo

62. 6th Period FINAL PROJECT
PRESENATION SCHEDULE
WEDNESDAY
May 27th
THURSDAY
May 28th
FRIDAY
May 29th
1st – Gabby & Stephanie
1st – Julio P. & Jose
1st - Sam
2nd – Josh & Leo
2nd -
2nd – Jennifer & Priscilla
3rd - Andrea
3rd – Brayan & Fatima
3rd – Ricardo & Efren
4th – Cecilia & Megan
4th – Jonathan & Denice
4th – Julio O. & Hannah
5th -
5th - Kim
5th - Carrie
6th -
6th – Giovanna, Edgar &
Mariela
6th – Prez & VP
7th – Jorge & Alvaro
7th - Marco
7th – Rolando & Mario

63. CLASS RANKINGS 5th – 71% 6th – 74% 4th – 77.52% 3rd – 77.85%
CLASS AVERAGE
PURCHASED FINAL
5th – 71%
6th – 74%
4th – 77.52%
3rd – 77.85%
4) 5th – 74%
6th – 88%
3rd – 97%
1) 4th – 100%