Japanese Comments on “ECSS SDWG comments to ISO v6.0, ”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appeal and Postconviction Relief
Advertisements

Discussion on SRM slag requirement and proposed solution ISO/TC20/S14/WG3 & ODCWG
Chandrayaan 1,the first pure space science mission ISRO had ever done. Chandrayaan-2 is the second unmanned lunar exploration mission proposed by.
© The Aerospace Corporation 2011 Space Debris & Debris Mitigation Marlon Sorge The Aerospace Corporation AIAA Improving Space Operations Workshop 5 April.
Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.
Federal Aviation Administration On-Orbit Debris Mitigation Methods for Upper Stages COMSTAC: Space Transportation Operations Working Group and Risk Management.
Safety Evaluation According To UK Regulations Dr Richard Crowther Head, Space Engineering & Technology Division Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Oxfordshire,
1 Atlas Truss Adapter & Launch Vehicle Details (all I can find in the Atlas Mission Planner’s Guide and Standard Interface Spec) David Robinson/543 7/18/08.
Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design Satellite Operations.
TARANIS a CNES Scientific Mission – C. Bastien-Thiry Workshop on Coupling of Thunderstorms and Lightning Discharges to Near-Earth Space – Corte 2008 TARANIS.
Common Mechanisms in UML
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.
Historical Growth of Space Debris Global Security Program Union of Concerned Scientists.
Long-term evolution of the space debris population Dr Hugh Lewis Astronautics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering & the Environment.
Sanitation Requirements in Space: The issues of Space Debris and its Management V. Adimurthy Indian Space Research Organisation.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Orbital Debris 10 June, 2015 Symposium for the Small.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
The Effectiveness of Space Debris Mitigation Measures ISU’s 16 th Annual International Symposium 21 st February 2012 Adam E. White, Hugh G. Lewis, Hedley.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Space Systems Engineering: Functional Analysis Module Functional Analysis Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0.
Open Data Promotion Consortium Noboru Koshizuka, Chief Researcher, Technical Committee Technical Committee Report of Activities of 2012 and Proposed.
S15: Supervision and review. Objective of supervision and review  To ensure that the audit is done efficiently and effectively so that the audit opinion.
Http: // ISO TC20/SC14/WG3 DIN Berlin, GE May 2011 Dr. David Finkleman, Convenor.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
1 Re-entry Risk Management for unmanned spacecraft and launch vehicle orbital stages ISO/TC20/SC14 (WD27875) 17, October 2007 ISO/TC20/SC14/WG3 Akira Kato,
Review of the ISO development 2/5/2016Bolennarth Svensson1 Initiation During 2004 the 5 year review of the standard ISO12357 (N347 (SC15)) and.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Debris Assessment for USA-193 Presentation to the 45 th Session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee.
MLPA Closures 2. “Children’s Pool Beach is not the only beach located in La Jolla. There are several beaches located adjacent to or in close proximity.
10/31/2006VSOP-2 Tracking Station Meeting 1 Lessons Learned From VSOP-1 Larry R. D’Addario JPL.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Session 7: Science and engineering lessons from the de- orbiting and re-entry phase C. Pardini (1), H. Krag.
INTOSAI WORKING GROUP ON PUBLIC DEBT May 2013 REVISION OF ISSAI 5421 Tribunal de Contas.
TK2023 Object-Oriented Software Engineering
Working Group 4 Facilities and Technologies
Professor melissa de Zwart Adelaide law School
Authors: Maria de Fatima Mattiello-Francisco Ana Maria Ambrosio
Writing Effective Short Reports
GIRO usage and GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset Policy S. Wagner
Unified Process (UP).
TEMPO’s Commercially Hosted Payload Concept
Enter your , phone, etc Enter your , phone, etc
Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
Transmitted by the expert
Systems Engineering Management
PLATON: Promoting Learning Approaches
CLEPA analysis of belt contact width measurement (ref. GRSP/2018/6)
Legal Issues Critical to SSA
IEEE 802 EC Privacy Recommendation SG Comments on Privacy PAR/CSD
Community Services Guidelines
Place all the time and date information for all your events
Derivation of the FSOA in Ariane 6 Specifications
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 10 May 2011 Sep 19, 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title:
Submission for CID 12 and 231 Date: Authors: 6/22/2006
Notice! This file is a ‘disabled’ file. It is not complete. Slides have been left out and other info is lacking. I have posted this file for general information.
Comment on post-registration and proposal
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 10 May 2011 Sep 19, 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title:
Overloading functions
PHY CID 3242 Date: Authors: September 2007 September 2007
Giove and Galileo: Effects
MA’s Response to Selected Comments
IEEE Comments on aq PAR and 5C
Test Mass N1 – « Payload ratio » – PSA proposal
Classifying Matter.
Classifying Matter.
Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction
Proposed Resolution to CID 1420
Proposed Resolution to CID 1420
Greenfield protection mechanism
The Atomic Theory.
Status of discussion after 7th meeting
Presentation transcript:

Japanese Comments on “ECSS SDWG comments to ISO 24113 v6.0, 6.1.1.2” 25.02.2009 Japanese delegation contact to: Kato.akira@jaxa.jp

Opinion of Japan: Japan propose to delete 6. 1. 1. 2, completely Opinion of Japan: Japan propose to delete 6.1.1.2, completely. Reasons are; Reason-1 Some kinds of lower structures will be released for multiple payloads launching in the world, but the number of element of such structure is not limited to one. In the case of H-2A, such structure is consisted of three elements. Perhaps other vehicles will have such structure made of multiple elements. These elements have been allowed as customary because of their short orbital lifetime. There is no need to mention. [Remark] In the “Support document Support to the IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines” said in its tailoring guide that “support structural elements left in orbit during a multiple payload mission may be released, if there are no feasible alternative measures at present. Fortunately, when released at low altitude their orbital lifetimes can be relatively short if their area-to-mass ratios are high.”

Reason-2 It is not normal to permit violation to this STD without any rational. If any execution would be essential, we might add “it will be allowed if the orbital lifetime is less than 25 years,” although we would not suggest it. We hope not to stimulate this matter. Such action should be done on the responsibility of each organization.

(3) Reason-3 The proposal from ECSS “For the launch of a single spacecraft there shall be at most one additional launch vehicle element injected into orbit” may be come from European Standard to allow to leave orbital stage in orbit. But this ISO STD treats the orbital stage separately from operational debris, such modification would only cause confusion.  European CoC says followings, (clearly, one object means orbital stage.) Ref. European Code of Conducts: SD-DE-01 a) For the launch of a single payload, there should be only one element (for example, stage) of the launch vehicle injected into orbit, excluding the payload. b) For the launch of multiple payloads, there should be at most two elements (for example, stage, adaptation structure for multiple payloads) of the launch vehicle injected into orbit, excluding payloads.