BUFFER LAW ENFORCEMENT County Board Decision - June 20, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Funding Administration. History of State Funding for Conservation Districts 1987 State legislature sunset local conservation district state funding.
Advertisements

Chehalis River Basin Flood Entity Formation Public Meeting Swede Hall, Rochester – October 14,
1 Role of Local, State and Federal Agencies in E&SC Issued May 2009 Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar Education and Training Requirements for Individuals.
Redirection of 1991 Realignment Los Angeles County.
Final Thoughts. Special Acknowledgments Board of Water & Soil Resources Local Soil & Water Conservation Districts County Environmental Services & Planning.
County of Orange Teeter Program
Deficit District Roles & Responsibilities. MCL A district or intermediate district receiving money under this act shall not adopt or operate.
Northern Michigan SBO March 16, 2011 Jeff Kolb Michigan Department of Education Jeff Kolb Michigan Department of Education.
2 A J B F 5 6 E 8 C G 10 4 I 26 H D N Legend Source drains into the ditch here. Data point directly.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Chehalis River Basin Flood Entity Formation Public Meeting Centralia Middle School, Centralia – October 28,
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
Chehalis River Basin Flood Entity Formation Public Meeting City Hall, Montesano – October 18,
Fiscal Year 2015 Rates INDIRECT COST CALCULATIONS.
Darren Carlson District Manager Kittson Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) 410 South 5 th Street, Suite 106 Hallock, MN (218)
Board of Water and Soil Resources Senate Environment, Economic Development and Agriculture Division Sarah Strommen, Assistant Director John Jaschke, Executive.
Summary of Proposed Changes to Shoreland Zoning Ordinance April 10, 2012.
Minnesota Buffers Initiative September 16, 2015 Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources John Jaschke, BWSR Executive Director Sarah Strommen,
School Budget (Draft)
1 Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG) A Program that works to: – Streamline assistance and $$ to landowners – Coordinate activities of federal and state.
County of Marin March 2004 County Budget Overview and Potential Impact of State Funding Cuts.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
Local Powers for Land Use Regulation. Local Land Use Powers Land use regulation is considered a residual power –In most circumstances, that is… –Power.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
Director’s Report May 21, Legislative Funding Requested $184,216 for biennium Requested $184,216 for biennium APPROVED for $200,000 (base funding)
District Type and Issues Identification Chehalis River Basin Flood Authority Entity Formation July 15, 2010.
Mississippi Headwaters Board Land Protection Process Mississippi River Protection Through Partnership.
1 Water Cooperative of Central Florida Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners July 26, 2011.
Crow Wing County Ditch #13 Public Hearing 10/27/15.
Budget Workshop February 15, :00 O’Neill Public Schools Central Office - Board Room.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
NCACC Environmental Steering Committee Legislative Update October 2013.
Implementation of Housing Element Update of Housing Element City Council Meeting Tuesday, September 24, 2013.
SCALF Annual Reporting
Agency Certification.
Dave Jones, Water Quality Program Manager Division of Conservation
TRIM for 2016 Presented by Citrus County Property Appraiser Chief Deputy Tonya Caldwell, CFE.
Potential Local Impacts from Proposition 64 and Measure L
Mn Buffers Program: Overview of 2016 Statute Clarifications
Key Factors for Clubs in doing both Club and Global Grants
Legal Status of Cities GOVT 2306, Module 11.
Agflex Inc. 1/13/04 Agriculture and Water Quality Credit Trading in Minnesota: Emerging Opportunities Presentation delivered by Thomas A. Green, President,
After the FCC Form 471 E-rate Program Applicant Training
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
Board of Supervisors May 9, 2017
Clean Water Fund Grants
CRESTWOOD LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FIVE YEAR FORECAST
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 UPDATE REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA VOTER PARTICIPATION RIGHTS ACT (CVPRA) AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S.
Department of Buildings
Municipal Net Profit Tax
2018 Clerks Summer Conference
Water Quality Credit Trading
County State Aid Needs.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
E-rate Filing Process – Post-commitment
Monthly Stakeholder Meeting May 31, 2018
Multijurisdictional Agreements
Tennessee Training Requirements
FINISHING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2017 AND WORKING ON FY2018
Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals Effective August 2018
Farmland Preservation Program
Independent School District No. 318 December 3, 2018
Local Government.
Staff Advisory Team Meeting #5 October 18, 2018
NC Legislative Branch: The General Assembly & Local Governments
Vegetation management
Request Permission to Proceed to the EMC for Approval of Delegation of the Neuse Buffer Program to Johnston County and Delegation of Further Approval Authority.
Beginner Track Application Process Part 2 (Post-Commitment)
Presentation transcript:

BUFFER LAW ENFORCEMENT County Board Decision - June 20, 2017

MN Buffer Law Minnesota Buffer Law requires a continuous vegetation buffer November 1, 2017 Buffer law goes into effect for PUBLIC WATERS (rivers, streams, lakes/basins) which are classified by the DNR as having protected shoreland Buffer of 50-foot average and 30-foot minimum UPDATED LEGISLATION (2017): A waiver will be granted until July 1, 2018 to landowners that filed for a parcel-specific riparian protection compliance plan with the SWCD by November 1, 2017. November 1, 2018 Buffer law goes into effect for PUBLIC DITCHES Buffer of 16.5 foot minimum SWCD required to review and determine compliance every 5 years Note difference between public waters and public ditches. Also, note that not all public waters are rivers or streams and that some are basins (lakes).

Known Status of Buffers (May 31, 2017) Public Waters (9,899 parcels) 96.7% compliant (9,573 parcels) 2.2% currently without adequate buffer (217 parcels) 1.1 % need review (by DNR and/or SWCD) (108 parcels) If the County Board elects enforcement jurisdiction, it would include all the Public Waters parcels.  Public Waters within: PW Parcels Non-Compliant North Fork/Crow R WD 1,272 45 Sauk River WD 5,101 136 Stearns Co (including Middle Fork Crow R) 2,896 23 Clearwater River WD 630 13 Note: compliance numbers do not include public ditches (in North Fork or Sauk) for which the county is not the drainage authority.

Known Status of Buffers (May 31, 2017) Public Ditches (1,137 parcels) – Deadline is November 1, 2018 The North Fork of the Crow River and Sauk River watershed districts are actively working towards compensation of the 16.5-ft buffer on all public ditches under their drainage authority by the deadline.   Ditch Parcels TOTAL 1,137 North Fork/Crow R WD* 336 Sauk River WD* 317 Stearns Co (including Middle Fork Crow R) 484 (18 non-compliant) Clearwater River WD Note: compliance numbers do not include public ditches (in North Fork or Sauk) for which the county is not the drainage authority.

County Election of Jurisdiction for Enforcement The County may delegate the enforcement authority to a City (within their boundaries – regardless of shoreland jurisdiction) or the SWCD.

Watershed Election of Jurisdiction for Enforcement

Enforcement Option Matrix

Buffer Enforcement Funding (2017) Funding estimates in this table are based on entity with 1st option of enforcement Funding formula in statute is only based on centerline miles (PW and public ditches) – public water basins were left out of the formula. DNR certifies the miles. These are estimates. WD (NR or Sauk) interest in PW is unknown.

Administrative Penalty Orders (APO) BWSR must adopt an APO plan by July 1, 2017 If County chooses to enforce the ordinance or APO must be approved by BWSR BWSR-issued APOs are $100/month (initial violation) or $500/day (repeat violation) The County or Watershed District may charge a different BWSR-approved fee amount APO penalties are remitted to the entity that issued it

Enforcement Jurisdiction – Pros & Cons Pros of Enforcement Local control of the enforcement process (and more enforcement tool options) Local control and public input on the county’s ordinance adoption (fee structure) Local knowledge of and rapport with landowners (SWCD, WD, & County) Cons of Enforcement Uncertainty of actual costs of enforcement / administration Additional responsibility / non-mandated program for County Loss of Natural Resource Block Grant funding if enforcement is not carried out as required Additional Consideration Determining how to distribute the Riparian Protection Aid within the County Delegation of enforcement to cities and/or the SWCD Lack of case law Addl: naming a contact / department to BWSR

Timeline Summary June 28, 2017 – County deadline to notify BWSR of election of jurisdiction for enforcement for FY2018 funding allocation. July 1, 2017 – Deadline for BWSR Administrative Penalty Order (APO) November 1, 2017 – Deadline for buffer compliance on all public waters (rivers, streams, lakes classified by DNR as protected shoreland) – unless the landowner was granted a waiver by the SWCD (per 2017 legislation). November 1, 2017 – County ordinance or rule must be in effect (if handling enforcement). November 1, 2018 – Deadline for 16.5’ buffer compliance on all public ditches.