Supreme Court Decision and Reasoning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Case Review The Rights of the Accused
Advertisements

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).
Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
Is the 6th Amendment Right to Counsel (lawyer) a Fundamental Right?
- Clarence Earl Gideon- Age 51 - Panama City, Florida - June 3, Break-in at Pool Room - Stolen Change in Juke Box/Vending Machine.
 Amendment VI  In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.
Landmark Supreme Court case: Gideon V. Wainwright
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Gideon vs. Wainwright (1963)
Gideon Vs Wainwright Louis Jenkins And Jackson Joy.
G IDEON V W AINWRIGHT (1963) Vivian Lee. C ASE O VERVIEW On June 2, 1961, ten dollars and drinks were stolen from a Panama City, Florida, pool hall Clarence.
The Right to Councel. Betts was indicted for robbery and detained in a Maryland jail. Betts was indicted for robbery and detained in a Maryland jail.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Legal Issues Unit 1 Review. Jurisprudence The study of law and legal philosophy.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
 What do lawyers do?  How can they be helpful?.
 Between midnight and 8 a.m.  June 30, 1961  Robbery at Bay Harbor Pool Room  Panama city, Florida.
Right to Counsel, Due Process
Unit 4 Lesson 7: Gideon v. Wainwright
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.
BELLWORK What are the three types of crime? (Page 430)
Selena McClure Period 3rd The Right to An Attorney
Supreme Court Case Study.  Analyze and discuss the system of the utilizing precedent in the American Court System.  Compare and Contrast how different.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).
Court and Adjudication Structure of American Courts Management of Courts To Be a Judge Prosecutorial Systems Defense Attorneys The Courtroom: How it Functions.
Judicial Branch Chapter 11 & 12. Types of Federal Courts  Constitutional Courts –Set up by Congress under Article III of the Constitution  Special Courts.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Miranda v. Arizona.
The Federal Court System In The United States
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Judicial Branch Famous Trials.
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
Warmup What kind of judgments do you have to make in your daily life?
The Supreme Court At Work
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Trial Rights GOVT Notes 5-4.
Trial Rights GOVT Notes 5-4.
The Federal Court System
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Cody Lee | Reed Elenz | 1st period 1963
The Role of the Judicial Branch (courts)
THIS IS JEOPARDY. THIS IS JEOPARDY With Your Host... Kathy Boudreaux.
Appeals Courts & Federal and State Court Systems
Clarence sues Louie You decide the outcome.
Gideon v Wainright 6th and 14th Amendments.
Primary function is to resolve disputes over the meaning of
Gideon v. Wainwright Does the Sixth Amendment allow a defendant the right to a lawyer in all criminal cases?
The Supreme Court GOVT Notes 5-2.
The Judicial Branch.
Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 Eliseo Lugo III
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch.
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
U.S. Legal History and Constitution
Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief”
Gideon v. Wainwright The Right to Legal Counsel
Presentation transcript:

Supreme Court Decision and Reasoning Gideon v wainwright Supreme Court Decision and Reasoning

Precedent Cases Powell v. Alabama (1932) – 9 African-American men arrested for rape – could not hire a lawyer. Found guilty, appealed numerous time. States must provide legal counsel in death penalty cases Betts v. Brady (1942) – Betts arrested for robbery and could not afford a lawyer – found guilty Court ruled that in extraordinary circumstances the state must provide counsel, but not in every situation. E.g., illiteracy, mental deficiency, etc. Gideon v. Wainwright: Should Betts be reconsidered?

Betts v Brady, 1942 Read the majority and minority opinions Record the arguments Made by Owens (Majority) and Black (Minority)

Gideon v Wainwright 1961 Teacher may want to show the court scene toward the beginning of the movie Gideon’s Trumpet starting Henry Fonda. This shows the difficulty Mr. Gideon had in defending himself but shows the judge trying to help him the best he can.

Gideon v Wainwright You are now the Supreme Court having to decide this question: Should the 14th amendment provision of “due process” apply to all state laws? Should Betts v Brady be overturned and should every defendant be provided a lawyer if they can’t afford one? Record the arguments for Gideon and for the State of Florida on your sheet of paper. Make your decision on the two questions and support it with legal reasoning and factual evidence. Teacher should show the Supreme Court scene in which Abe Fortas argues for Gideon and the Attorney General of Florida argues against Gideon. The teacher should pause the video after Fortas and allow students to complete the arguments made by Fortas. Then show the Florida Attorney General and pause again to help students find the key arguments. Mini-SC groups should make their final decision and defend it with prior case precedent and language from the U.S. Constitution. They can rely on Powell, Betts, and also the Constitutional Amendments.

Supreme Court Decision Hugo Black (Justice who wrote dissenting opinion on Betts v Brady wrote the 9-0 decision stating two things: Every defendant should be granted a lawyer if they can’t afford one The 14th amendment incorporates the Bill of Rights into it and applies to state laws.