digital FDA Bakul Patel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD Public meeting July 19, 2010
Advertisements

BME-IDEA Workshop, September 28, 2005
"Determining the Regulatory Pathway to Market" Classification Heather S. Rosecrans Director, 510(k) Staff Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
510k Submission Overview Myraqa, Inc. August 22, 2012.
Options for Regulation and the Impact of Regulation on the Marketplace 29 November 2005 Alan Kent
Health Line of Business Revised Health Domains January 26, 2005 Outcomes / Domains have been revised.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Medical Devices Approval Process
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
FDASIA REGULATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE May 22, Agenda 4:00 p.m.Call to Order – MacKenzie Robertson Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Application of Quality Management System IMDRF/WG/N23 Proposed Document (PD1)R3.
Prof. Moustafa M. Mohamed Vice dean Faculty of Allied Medical Science Pharos University in Alexandria Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)
Work product for review and discussion by the FDASIA Regulation Subgroup; May not reflect the subgroup’s views REGULATORY WEAKNESSES A report of the typist.
1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.
Risk Assessments: Patient Safety and Innovation Innovation Discussion 02 July 2013.
CDRH INITIATIVES FOR AGING IN PLACE NIH Aging in Place Workshop September 10-11, 2014 Presented by Mary Brady, MSN, RN Senior Policy Advisor Center for.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Clinical Quality Public Hearing June 7, 2012 HIT Standards & Policy Committees Summary: June 20, 2012 Marjorie Rallins, Clinical Quality WG, HIT Standards.
Utah Life Science Summit Nov Phil Triolo, PhD RAC President, Phil Triolo and Associates LC.
Nursing Informatics NI.
FDA Regulation Economically Harmful & Morally Indefensible.
Regulatory Decision Making D. Kathleen Wright, Reviewer Division of Microbiology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation & Safety ( OIVD ) Food.
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
Medical Device Regulations in Canada; Key Challenges and International Initiatives.
 Pharmaceutical Care is a patient-centered, outcomes oriented pharmacy practice that requires the pharmacist to work in concert with the patient and.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Digital Health Think Tank kick-off meeting June 14, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Healthcare Diagnostics Accreditation
HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION & RETAINING QUALITY
Regulatory Updates Health Sciences Authority Singapore
POST APPROVAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Use of Postmarket Data to Support Premarket Approvals
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
Postmarket Assessment in the U.S. and Unique Device Identifiers (UDI)
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
Critical Care Services Pharmacist Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
Karen Proud, President Consumer Health Products Canada
Mary Alexander, MA, RN, CRNI®, CAE, FAAN Chief Executive Officer
FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Summary of Public Notification of Emerging Postmarket Medical Device Signals (“Emerging Signals”) Effective: December.
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
From the Ground Up: Building an effective continuing education system for Egypt’s clinicians and community Prof. Graham McMahon, MD MMSc President and.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
HL7 International January Working Group Meeting Health Care Device WG
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
Interprofessional Education
NEW MDR Regulatory Context. NEW MDR Regulatory Context.
FDA Sentinel Initiative
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Canada’s Strategy for a Safe and Nutritious Food Supply
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
FDA Regulation of Animal Biotechnology Products
Patients and Families Statement
HealthCare Artificial Intelligence
Presentation transcript:

digital Health @ FDA Bakul Patel June 6, 2019

Image Credit: Time Magazine Effects of Moore’s Law Grossman, Lev “The Singularity – 2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal.” Time Magazine. Published Feb. 2011: 4 Pages. Time.com. http://content.time.com/time/interactive/0,31813,2048601,00.html Accessed Mar. 2019 Image Credit: Time Magazine

FDA Recognizes Increasing Digitization Across the Healthcare Continuum Moving healthcare from the clinic to the patient. Understanding patient’s behavior and physiology “in the wild.” Focusing on prevention for early/smaller interventions. Leveraging computing power, sensors, connectivity, and software.

Digital Health Team Vision ____ Digital Health Team Vision Prepare the FDA for the Digital Health future by promoting innovation and ensuring all Americans have timely access to high-quality, safe and effective digital health products.

Digital Health Technology Digital health technology is the convergence of computing power, connectivity, sensors, and software used in healthcare. Used as a medical product; Incorporated into a medical product (include a pharmacologic product); Used to develop a medical product; Used to study a medical product; Used as a companion or adjunct to a medical product, including diagnostics and therapeutics.

Embracing Digital Health Innovation Digital tools can provide consumers with valuable health information. What qualifies as a digital health product? What digital health technologies need regulation? Left side is benefits of digital health Right side are questions that FDA should consider Consumers who are better informed about health make better decisions.

Fostering Responsible Digital Health Innovation Goals for a Tailored Regulatory Framework Fostering Responsible Digital Health Innovation Enhance patients access to high quality digital medical products Enable manufacturers to rapidly improve software products with minor changes Maintain a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness Minimally burdensome

FDA approach to regulation of digital health products

A Risk-Based Approach… Increasing Risk Classification determines extent of regulatory control (Risk Based) Class III General controls Premarket approval (PMA) Class II General controls Special controls Class I General Controls General Controls Electronic Establishment Registration Electronic Device Listing Quality Systems Labeling Medical Device Reporting (MDR) Premarket Notification [510(k)] (unless exempt) Special Controls (addressing Risk) Guidelines (e.g., Glove Manual) Mandatory Performance Standard Recommendations or Other Actions Special Labeling

…Aimed At Smart Regulation Risk Based Narrowly Tailored Functionality Focused Platform Independent

Focus on Higher-Risk Functionalities Lower risk functionalities FDA does not intend to enforce applicable regulatory requirements Higher risk functionalities FDA provides appropriate oversight to ensure patient safety while support timely access to innovative products

Mobile Medical Apps (MMA) A “Mobile Medical App” is a mobile app that meets the definition of device in section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act); and either is intended: to be used as an accessory to a regulated medical device; or to transform a mobile platform into a regulated medical device MMA Guidance Document Focus of oversight MMA Lower risk mobile apps that meet the definition of a medical device Mobile apps that do not meet the definition of a medical device

Tools available from FDA https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DigitalHealth/ucm562577.htm

   Global Convergence  2013 Foundational vocabulary 2014 – Risk framework based on impact to patients 2015 – QMS control Translating Software development practices to regulatory QMS SaMD –Clinical Evaluation Generating evidence for clinically meaningful SaMD    

21st Century Cures Act Codifies current policies and excludes certain software products from medical device definition: Medical device data systems EHR certified by ONC General wellness products Administrative products Excludes certain types of clinical decision support products from the definition of a medical device. Excluded products must meet all of the following criteria: Does not acquire or analyze physiological signals; Is intended to display information about a patient; Provides recommendations to physicians; and Allows health care professionals to independently review the basis for such recommendations. For products with multiple functions, allows FDA to regulate only those functions that meet the definition of a medical device

FDA Pre-Cert Program An organization-based streamlined regulatory approach for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) that relies on a demonstrated Culture of Quality and Organizational Excellence

Five Excellence Principles Proposed Patient Safety Demonstration of a commitment to providing a safe patient experience, and to emphasizing patient safety as a critical factor in all decision-making processes. Product Quality Demonstration of a commitment to the development, testing, and maintenance necessary to deliver SaMD products at the highest level of quality. Clinical Responsibility Demonstration of a commitment to responsibly conduct clinical evaluation and to ensure that patient-centric issues including labeling and human factors are appropriately addressed. Cybersecurity Responsibility Demonstration of a commitment to protect cybersecurity, and to proactively address cybersecurity issues through active engagement with stakeholders and peers. Proactive Culture Demonstration of a commitment to a proactive approach to surveillance, assessment of user needs, and continuous learning.

Our Goals For a New Model How can a pre-certification program address the evolving needs of SaMD products? Enable a tailored, pragmatic, and least burdensome regulatory oversight that Assesses organizations to establish trust that they have a culture of quality and organizational excellence such that they can develop high quality SaMD products; Leverages transparency of organizational excellence and product performance across the entire lifecycle of SaMD; Uses a tailored streamlined premarket review; Leverages unique postmarket opportunities available in software to verify the continued safety, effectiveness, and performance of SaMD in the real world.

Digital Health Center of Excellence “ We’re building our Digital Health Center of Excellence to develop more efficient ways to ensure the safety and effectiveness of technologies like smart watches with medical apps. Our Software Precertification Pilot Program is allowing us to test a new approach for product review. ” Dr. Scott Gottlieb, FDA Commissioner April 2, 2019

Concept: A Reimagined Approach Using FDA Pre-Cert Commercial Distribution & Real-World Use e.g. lower-risk software, certain modifications Real World Data Collection Based on SaMD Risk + Pre-Cert level Streamlined Premarket Review FDA Pre-Cert level Clinical Trials Regulatory Science Real-World Evidence Outcomes research Patient Preference DH feedback FDA Pre-Cert effectiveness feedback Assessment effectiveness feedback

Reimagining the Regulatory Approach While maintaining reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness Today’s Device World (Hardware-based) Digital Health Device World (Software-Based) Leverages real world performance data Pre-Market Organization-Level Data Pre-Market Product-Level Data Post-Market Data Go-To-Market Shortens the timeline for premarket product review On the left side is the current regulatory pathway FDA uses when reviewing products. This was designed for hardware-based products and limited organizational data and postmarket data is available to us. In the reimagined approach for software, FDA takes advantage of the wealth of real world data, and decreases the pre-market product review time period while still ensuring safety. This approach enables the evaluation and monitoring of a software product from its premarket development to post-market performance, along with continued demonstration of the organization’s excellence. Adds appraisal of company’s culture of excellence

Follow me on Twitter @_BakulPatel Get More Information www.fda.gov/digitalhealth DigitalHealth@fda.hhs.gov Bakul Patel Bakul.Patel@fda.hhs.gov Follow me on Twitter @_BakulPatel