CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
After Posipol In my opinion we are still too much dispersed. We have to re compact our community if we want to succeed in presenting a Compton version.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors LCWS, Arlington, Texas, October 22 th -26 th, 2012Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Overview of the CLIC main beam injectors.
Undulator based polarized positron source for Circular electron-positron colliders Wei Gai Tsinghua University/ANL a seminar for IHEP, 4/8/2015.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER DAMPING RING COMPLEX J.N. Corlett, S. Marks, R. Rimmer, R. Schlueter Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley,
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
SuperB Injector (2) R. Boni, INFN-LNF - on behalf of the “Injector Study Group” SuperB Mini-MAC, Frascati July, 2008 D. Alesini, R. Boni, F. Marcellini,
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Positron Source and Injector
Positron Sources of Next generation B-factories (SuperKEKB, SuperB)
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Injector and positron source scheme. A first evaluation Thanks to O
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
INJECTION SYSTEM UPDATE
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
BINP Tau-Charm Project
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Electron Source Configuration
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
LAL meeting on e+ studies, Oct. 2010
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006
Summary of Washington DOE Review
JLEIC electron injection demo
Super-B Accelerator Overview
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
JLEIC electron injection demo
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
Polarization at the Super-B Factory
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Injection design of CEPC
CEPC injector beam dynamics
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Electron mode A B C D > 4 GeV e- θ g e- DR α PS
Presentation transcript:

CDR2 – Injection System 1.12 - Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages) 1.12.1 - Source (Brachmann) (3 p) 1.12.2 - Linac (Boni) (6 p) 1.12.2.1 - General description 1.12.2.2 - Low energy conversion linac 1.12.2.3 - High energy conversion option 1.12.2.4 - Buncher RF system 1.12.2.5 – S-band accelerating structures 1.12.2.6 - RF power sources 1.12.2.7 - RF power distribution 1.12.2.8 - Low level RF 1.12.2.9 - The C-band option 1.12.3 - Damping ring & T.L.’s (Preger) (3 p) 1.12.4 – Injection into the rings (Guiducci) (3 p)

1.12 Injection System Overview The injection system for SuperB is capable of injecting electrons and positrons into their respective rings at full energies. The HER needs positrons at 6.7 GeV and the LER 4.18 GeV polarized electrons. At full luminosity and beam currents, up to 3.5 A, the HER and LER have expected beam lifetimes as low as 5 minutes. Thus, the injection process must be continuous, called top-up injection, to keep nearly constant beam current and luminosity. Multiple bunches (~five) will be injected on each linac pulse into one or the other of the two rings. Positron bunches are generated by striking a high charge electron bunch onto a positron convertor target and collecting the emergent positrons. The transverse and longitudinal emittances of the electron bunches and, especially, of the generated positron bunches are larger than the LER and HER acceptances and must be predamped. A specially designed damping ring at 1 GeV is used to reduce the injected beam emittances. This damping ring is shared for the two particle types to reduce costs. An overview of the injection system is shown in Figure 1. Fig. 1 Figure 1 Overall layout of the SuperB Injection System Figure 2 Injection and extraction from the shared Damping Ring

The transport lines into and out of the damping ring are shown in Figure 2. The electron to positron conversion is done at about 0.6 GeV using a newly designed target and capture section to produce a yield of about 10% (?). The electrons from the gun source are longitudinally polarized. The particle spins are rotated to the vertical plane in a special transport section downstream of the gun. The spins now remain vertical for the rest of the injection system and injected in this vertical state into the LER. The specific injection parameter values are described here. The linac operates at 50 Hz. A short train of 5 bunches (1 to 20 possible) at a time are produced for each beam type, stored for 20 msec in the damping ring, and then extracted and accelerated to full injection energy. The nominal stored beam current in each ring is 2.1 A, but the injector is designed to accommodated the maximum stored current of 3.5 A. At 3.5 A the number of stored particles are about 1014 particles total per SuperB ring. With a 5 minute lifetime, 1.23 x 1011 particles are lost per second per ring. With 5 injected bunches per pulse and an injection rate of 16 Hz, each injected bunch has a charge of 1.5 x 109. This charge is about 1.5% of the SuperB stored bunch charge and, thus, the rms bunch current will be constant to about 0.5% over time. The vertical polarization averaged over the electron bunch is expected to be about 88%. The details of the injection system are described in the following sections.