The Supportive and the Survivalist: How have tutor attitudes changed in a decade? John Buglear.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Athens June 2011 EMPOWERMENT TOOL: PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS.
Advertisements

How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction? Diana Bilimoria, Susan R. Perry, Xiangfen Liang, Patricia Higgins, Eleanor P. Stoller,
L/O/G/O Bringing Health Polytechnic of Semarang to A World Class University by Implementation of Quality Assurance Sugiyanto; Marsum; Lanny Sunarjo 2014.
University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.
QUESTIONARIES: Rosenberg´s Self-Esteem Scale 2 Filip Habrman Veronika Foltýnková.
Leeds University Business School Management Alistair Norman Management Division.
January 6, afternoon session 1 Statistics Micro Mini Multiple Regression January 5-9, 2008 Beth Ayers.
Andreas Walmsley & Glyn Littlewood What’s in the news? Using case studies in business education February 2012.
Important Determinants of Job Stress. Introduction Stress is the body's reaction to a change that requires a physical, mental or emotional adjustment.
Registration Satisfaction Survey FAS Report, Fall Presented by: K. El Hassan, PhD. Director, OIRA.
Step Up To: Psychology by John J. Schulte, Psy.D. Psychology, Eighth Edition By David G. Myers Worth Publishers (2007)
Intelligence Smart, How? Different Strokes Take a Test How do we measure it? Where do you get yours?
A Guide to Student Finance. A Guide to Student Finance What do I have to pay for? What help is available How to apply How to repay Budgeting and tips.
Chinese Urban Youth’s Perception toward EU Speaker: Changjian JiangAug. 21 rd, 2008.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
Yueh-Kuei, Huang Lecturer, Yu Da University of Business PhD student, Dept. of Industrial Technology Education, NKNU, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
The Gendered Academy Ruth Adams Department of Culture, Media & Creative Industries
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Presentation of the results of Study 1: Barriers to Female Participation in STEM post-secondary programs February, 2014.
Depression Screening of Children and Adolescents With Diabetes Lizzy Shaw
Economic Identity and professional self-determination Natalya Antonova Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
BASIC_CONCEPTS CHAPTER1. POPULATION AND SAMPLE Population Target population Accessible population Sample Descriptive statistics vs. Census Inferential.
Descriptive Research Study Investigation of Positive and Negative Affect of UniJos PhD Students toward their PhD Research Project Dr. K. A. Korb University.
©The Work Foundation Putting Dads in Context: A Changing World 5 April 2005 Alexandra Jones The Work Foundation.
Step Up To: Psychology PERCEPTION Psychology, Eighth Edition By David G. Myers.
Thurstone Scaling.
Martha Munoz Janet Soto Latoya Gallardo. Abstract  In this study, the correlation between social confidence and academic confidence in Latinos and Asian.
OSER Faculty Data Introduction  Parallel survey of faculty to graduate student results presented by Russ  Time series presented based on.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Measuring Outcomes of Doctoral Programs: Alumni and Exit Surveys at Western University CAGS October 2015.
Some sociological aspects on gender discrimination at work in Croatia Branka Galić Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of sociology Zagreb,
Chapter 6 Indexes, Scales, And Typologies Key Terms.
JOHN DOE PERIOD 8. AT LEAST 80% OF HUMANITY LIVES ON LESS THAN $10 A DAY.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure & Post-Tenure Review Presentation for NC State Faculty Senate February 27, 2007 Nancy.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.47 (Education 2014), pp Instructor’s Evaluation on Importance.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 46.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Reminder The midterm exam will test material associated with Chapters 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the textbook.
Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.
TEXT MESSAGING AS A FORM OF COMMUNICATION A presentation about the hypothesis, survey and results.
Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes at Pitt Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies University of Pittsburgh.
EMPLOYER vs. EMPLOYEES (Survey Results).
Progress report on Performance Indicators
World Beaters or Underachievers
Rationale and Significance Findings/Conclusions
Does e-Resources access improve Academic and Research Productivity
Saint Joseph’s college of maine
2016 School Climate Survey: Northgate Crossing Elementary School
How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction?
Business Assessment Test Results
Business Assessment Test Results
Measures of Central Tendency
Chapter 4 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol. 47 (Education 2014), pp
Introduction to Marketing Research
T-test Tests the differences in the means between two groups
CLICK TO GO BACK TO KIOSK MENU
Are the future teachers really apt to teach?
Math 153 Stats Starts Here.
Gender Development.
Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics American vs
Factors involved in analyses:
மீன்’ பிடிப்போம்’.
Market Research (Sampling)
Attitudes of Post Graduates Diploma in Education(PGDE) Teachers Towards Teaching Profession. Introduction: Attitude is defined as predisposition to respond.
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS BORAM KANG
Do gender difference exist in general attitudes?
Survey Design.
Presentation transcript:

The Supportive and the Survivalist: How have tutor attitudes changed in a decade? John Buglear

Preliminaries 1: Context Comparisons between 2006 and 2016 Tuition fees trebled Research activity steady: > 50,000 academic staff in both RAE 2008 and in REF 2014 Higher Education Academy accreditations up So, how do tutor attitudes to their students in 2016 compare with those in 2006?

Preliminaries 2: Analytical approach Supportive vs Survivalist tutors Supportive: student-focussed, empathetic Survivalist: subject-focussed, ‘gatekeepers’ Attitude measurement using Thurstone scaling Statement generation and evaluation on a scale from 1 to 11: 1 (extreme survivalist – ‘Student who drop out tend to be spoilt brats who can’t make it without Mum and Dad holding their hand’) 11 (extreme supportive – ‘I want all students to come here to graduate’) Questionnaire design and elicitation: May/June 2006 (n=82) and May/June 2016 (n=85) Calculation of tutor scores (weighted average of Agreed statements): the higher the score the more supportive

Distributions of scores Mean (2006) = 7.16, Mean (2016) = 7.41

Distribution of scores by gender Females:. Mean (2006) = 7 Distribution of scores by gender Females: Mean (2006) = 7.14, Mean (2016) = 7.39 Males: Mean (2006) = 7.17, Mean (2016) = 7.43

Distribution of scores by job Lecturers:. Mean (2006) = 7 Distribution of scores by job Lecturers: Mean (2006) = 7.15, Mean (2016) = 7.37 Heads: Mean (2006) = 8.06, Mean (2016) = 7.81 Professors: Mean (2006) = 6.57, Mean (2016) = 7.45

Distribution of scores by department

Distribution of scores by department Accounting: Mean (2006) = 6.55, Mean (2016) = 7.45 Economics: Mean (2006) = 7.21, Mean (2016) = 6.95 HRM: Mean (2006) = 7.55, Mean (2016) = 7.67 Management: Mean (2006) = 7.15, Mean (2016) = 7.44 Marketing: Mean (2006) = 7.31, Mean (2016) = 7.80

Distribution of scores by HE career duration Less than 5 years: Distribution of scores by HE career duration Less than 5 years: Mean (2006) = 8.06, Mean (2016) = 7.37 5 to 10 years: Mean (2006) = 7.67, Mean (2016) = 7.51 More than 10 years: Mean (2006) = 6.98, Mean (2016) = 7.40

Who were the least supportively inclined in 2016? 17 respondents with scores < 6.5 8 females (47.1%), 9 males (52.9%) 42.4% and 57.6% respectively in sample 1 in Accounting (5.9%), 9 in Economics (52.9%), 2 in HRM (11.8%), 2 in Management (11.8%) and 1 in Marketing (5.9%) 18.8%, 23.5%, 11.8%, 30.6% and 15.3% respectively in sample 6 less than 5 years experience (35.3%), 3 between 5 and 10 (17.6%), 8 more than 10 (47.1%) 24.7%, 20.0% and 55.3% respectively in sample

Who were the least supportively inclined in 2006? 16 respondents with scores < 6.5 6 females (37.5%), 10 males (62.5%) 42.7% and 57.3% respectively in sample 9 in Accounting (56.3%), 1 in Economics (6.2%), 2 in HRM (12.5%), 3 in Management (18.8%) and 1 in Marketing (6.2%) 26.2%, 11.3%, 27.5%, 26.2% and 8.8% respectively in sample 16 more than 10 year experience (100%) 78.1% in sample