Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Context, Rationale and State of Play Presentation by Julie Sors European Commission Rotterdam,
Advertisements

Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
Regions for Economic Change: Innovating Through EU Regional Policy Workshop 2B Developing Poles of Excellence: Partnerships Between Research Institutions.
ENHANCING CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION AMONGST EUROPES UNIVERSITIES Dr. John H Smith Deputy Secretary General (Research and Innovation) European University.
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.
The International Trade Centre (UNCTAD/WTO) The International Trade Centre (UNCTAD/WTO)
The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
EuropeAid Co-operation Office Institutional Capacity Development Operations for the ACP Countries Unit AIDCO C4 Centralised Operations for the ACP Countries.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Prof. Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President 6 th University-Business Forum Partnerships for Jobs and Growth Brussels, 12 February 2015 Partnerships for Jobs.
SiS Consultation ERRIN SiS Working Group Meeting
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE WG PROJECT IDEAS AND INITIATIVES WG3 CREATIVITY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP MEETING BUCHAREST
Co-funded by the PROGRESS Programme of the European Union EQUINET – European Network of Equality Bodies 2014 Equinet Annual General Meeting 4 December.
International Aspects of the European Research Agenda Lesley Wilson EUA Secretary General Monash University 15 November 2007.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Building Successful Partnerships Facilitating Innovation Through Collaboration.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Higher Education and Research: Mission and Interaction David Crosier CONFERENCE TO LAUNCH WORK ON A MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN ALBANIA Tirana,
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Marie Curie Schemes - ToK Marie Curie Host Fellowships for the Transfer of Knowledge ToK.
An Introduction to the European Academy of Business in Society and the RESPONSE project Dr. Pablo Collazzo-Yelpo, EABIS Director, Academic Affairs Kiev.
The Governance and Management of European Universities – Future Trends Thomas Estermann Senior Programme Manager European University Association Targu.
Policy Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
CREATING THE FUTURE Challenges and Opportunities for ICT in Education and Development Patti Swarts, GeSCI Africa Regional Programme Manager TPD Workshop,
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
NordForsk Gunnel Gustafsson Strategies and tools for Grand Challenges responding Research Brussels February 28th 2012.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
The search for new ways of Quality Assurance The project “European Quality Audit” of the Universities of Bremen and Siegen Dr. Anke Rigbers.
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Lunchtime Staff Meeting: Strategy development update – final stages
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
Curriculum (Article 6) Teachers should be involved in all phases of curriculum development ..(design, piloting, implementation and review). Promote understanding.
Institutional Strengthening Support
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Sustainable EU Research Infrastructures
EuropeAid Co-operation Office
European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue
Promoting European Excellence Rooted in Regions and Cities: Territorial Connections Anna Lisa Boni Secretary General EUROCITIES @EUROCITIEStweet.
EXPLORING GLOBAL COOPERATION OPPORTUNITIES
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Ann Hodgson, Ken Spours, David Smith and Julia Jeanes
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
Working with Industry/External Organisations for Researchers
Environment and Development Policy Section
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
RCA Workshop on RCARO Future Strategies July 2007
Training on joint doctoral studies
Doctoral Education in Europe: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member, CDPPE Ad Hoc Group on Higher Education European Conference on the Local Mission of Higher Education Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. 18-19 June 2019

Introduction In 2014 EUA published a report entitled “University-Business Collaborative Research: Goals, Outcomes and New Assessment Tools” which arose from a project involving 24 universities, their external partners 18 businesses and 8 public authorities in 12 European countries. Although the focus was on collaborative research, the findings have wider implications for the enhancement of university missions in tackling societal challenges and providing innovative approaches and solutions that can be applied at the local and regional levels with a range of stakeholders.

The project started on the premise that a new multi-dimensional assessment tool was needed for collaborative research. For the following reasons: Assessment of university-based research has tended to be dominated by reference to assessment tools focussed on measuring output in terms of scientific publication citation, Nobel Prize and other high achievement scientific awards These tools are designed essentially for measurement of high performance in fundamental research in research-intensive universities. The definition of “excellence” in university research has tended as a result to be confined to this paradigm, whereas “excellence” in research can demonstrate itself in other research missions Where “ranking exercises” outcomes based upon traditional assessment tools become highly influential in resource allocation to universities – this can be potentially detrimental to the further development of wider missions of universities

Keys Lessons for Success learned by participating universities and their external business partners Developing trustful relationships between the partners The role of institutional leadership in promoting and supporting collaborative research Identifying relevant research topics for all stakeholders involved in the collaboration The importance of public funding Defining clear expectations for the collaboration Furthering the institution’s role in the knowledge exchange process – more widely defined beyond “technology-push” to “social innovation” in the economy and society Enhancing the degree of professionalisation of staff involved in collaborative research The important role of social sciences and humanities And finally, not least, collaboration needed to be considered as a “public good”, particularly in terms of how it contributes to building sustainability of cooperation between the university and its external partners

Assessment tools developed in the project did not aim to assess the quality of the research outcomes but rather the university-business collaboration process Building a collaborative research activity required: Strategic approaches Structural factors Facilitating aspects Leading to the identification of: Goals Outcomes Benefits/Impacts

Strategic approaches and motivations underlying universities’ and companies’ engagement – 7 Indicators Organisational strategy in fostering collaboration Increasing R & D capacity Applied research to industrial challenges and for development of innovative products and services Access to academic/business expertise Broadening research funding sources Promoting regional development Providing input for policy development

Structural factors in setting-up research collaboration – 4 Indicators Organisational and institutional support Public support to university-business research collaboration (through regional, national and European policies) Geographical proximity Key role of knowledge exchange expertise in the university

Facilitating aspects for successful collaborations – 8 Indicators Previous successful experience between the partners Trustful relationships Commitment and Interdependence between the partners Working in a network (open innovation) Interdisciplinary research Efficient contractual negotiation and management processes Getting the “right” people profiles Incentives for researchers to engage in collaborative research

Goals, Outcomes and Impacts of Research Collaboration I Goals, Outcomes and Impacts of Research Collaboration I. Institutional/Organisational Development – 9 Indicators Increased awareness of value of collaboration Furthering the university mission Visibility/reputation Attracting students Access to and shared use of infrastructure and human resources amongst partners University education or programme activities jointly developed and run with partners Consulting services Appointments to advisory committees/bodies Improving the learning experience of students

Goals, Outcomes and Impacts of Research Collaboration II Goals, Outcomes and Impacts of Research Collaboration II. Strengthening Human Resources – 3 Indicators Enhanced professionalisation of human resources Employment of graduates/postgraduates in the non-academic sector Research and, crucially, research management positions created ALL LEAD TO: the creation of new forms of local and regional innovation and development

Examples of Issues for Debate - Being a Local University Project demonstrated that fostering collaboration brought in both established partners to the university, but importantly also how new partners such as SMEs and local public authorities were brought in who had not previously seen the university as a potential partner Public funding was essential in order to provide the structural elements which were beyond the capacity of individual partners, such as infrastructure, political/policy support and regional strategies Recruitment of people with different skillsets, and establishing incentives for existing staff to engage in outreach to external organisations/partners

Thank you for your attention Report Reference: “University-Business Collaborative Research: Goals, Outcomes and New Assessment Tools” Lidia Borrell-Damian, Rita Morais and John H Smith EUA Publication 2014 Download at https://eua.eu