March 2014 Proposed Resolution to Comments Pertaining to Section 9.33.11 in CC12 Date: 2014-3-19 KB Png.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0509r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 72, 119 and 128 Qian ChenSlide 1 May 2014 Date:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission June 2011 Power Saving in Beam Beamforming for 11ad Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0407r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to Comments Pertaining to Section in CC12 Date: KB PngSlide 1 March 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0782r2 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 120 Slide 1 July 2014 Qian Chen.
Doc.: IEEE /0786r1 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 26, 27, 37, 38, 40-47, 49-53, 67-71, 114, 115, 118 and 124 Qian ChenSlide 1 July 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2011 Padam Kafle, Nokia Submission Simplification of Enablement Procedure for TVWS Authors: Date: July 18, 2011 NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE Submission Oct Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE /0590r0 Submission May 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 MAC beaconing sync comment resolution overview Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /1291r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Dynamic Bandwidth Control for aj (60GHz New Technique Proposal) KB Png.
TGai SB3000 Comment Overview
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> 10/3/2017
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2013
Comment Resolution Actions
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
802.11k Kaiser Changes to the Specification
TWT Information frames in 11ax
Mar Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Draft PAR & CSD Comment Responses] Date Submitted:
Spec text clarification for FDMA
Discussion on CID2199 Date: Authors: Jan 2014 Name Company
Asymmetric beamforming training procedure enhancements
Multiple MAC addresses
Suggested comment resolution on MDA Access Fraction (MAF)
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
Multi-band Discovery Assistance for ay (CR on CID 1771)
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
March 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Comment Resolution Suggestions Date Submitted:
Proposed resolution text for CCF related CIDs
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 10 May 2011 Sep 19, 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title:
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
CR for CID 1105 Date: Authors: January 2019 Month Year
Proposed resolution of CID 3518
Proposed resolution of CID 3518
June 2006 doc.: IEEE /0851r0 June 2006 LB84 Frame Format Ad-hoc Comment Resolution CID# 701, 7239, 9979, 3773, 7127 Date: Authors:
Submission Title: LB Resolutions from kivinen
Proposed Resolutions to RFI comments of LB 166 on IEEE s D7.0
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 10 May 2011 Sep 19, 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏ Submission Title:
Multi-band Discovery Assistance for ay (CR on CID 1771)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Spec text clarification for FDMA
Submission Title: LB Resolutions from kivinen
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Comment Resolution Suggestions Date Submitted:
Coex RIFS Discussion Date: Authors: November 2006
(60GHz New Technique Proposal)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
MAC Protocol to Support Dynamic Bandwidth for aj (60GHz)
Submission Title: LB Resolutions from kivinen
Centralized Clustering Resolution to CID 127
Decentralized Clustering Resolution to CID 127
Centralized Clustering Resolution to CID 127
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: sec
(60GHz New Technique Proposal)
3-4, Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka, Japan
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2013
Proposed Resolution to CID 147 in CC12
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Introduction to TDD General and TDD MLME comment resolution
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Still More LB156 Comment Resolutions Date.
DMG STA Directional Transmit Activity Report Frame
Proposed Resolution to CID 116 in CC
Presentation transcript:

March 2014 Proposed Resolution to Comments Pertaining to Section 9.33.11 in CC12 Date: 2014-3-19 KB Png

March 2014 Introduction This presentation proposed the resolutions to the comments to Tgaj draft specifications D0.01 section 9.33.11 in CC12. The resolutions addressed the following comments in the comments database IEEE 802.11-14-0281r1. CID 19 CID 28 CID 20 CID 29 CID 21 CID 30 CID 22 CID 31 CID 23 (part of) CID 32 CID 24 CID 65 CID 25 (part of) KB Png

Response to CID 19 (1/2) Comment March 2014 Response to CID 19 (1/2) Comment "During the scan phase, which lasts for at least aMaxBIDuration, devices scheduled to operate in the alternative channel shall scan the channel to determine whether the alternative channel is occupied by another network.” What is the action related to "shall scan"? How is the start and stop of this phase determined? Normative verbs require precise definitions of all the conditions and all the actions. KB Png

Response to CID 19 (2/2) Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 19 (2/2) Suggested Remedy Replace undefined terms "shall scan" and "the scan phase" with precise definitions related to observable actions or on-the-air signalling. Propose to Accept. Revised Text The spectrum access in the alternative channel is divided into three phases: monitor phase, transmission phase and suspension phase. Scheduled transmission in the alternative channel shall start with the monitor phase and then the three phases rotate cyclically until all the scheduled transmissions in the alternative channel are completed. The monitor phase shall last for aMaxBIDuration. During the monitor phase, a CDMG STA that is scheduled to operate in the alternative channel shall listen for the transmission of DMG or CDMG Beacon frames in the alternative channel. KB Png

Response to CID 20 (1/2) Comment Suggested Remedy March 2014 Response to CID 20 (1/2) Comment “all the devices shall” You cannot write a normative statement across more than one device. Suggested Remedy Replace in the singular using the template form: "A <entity> that <conditions> shall <actions>“, KB Png

Response to CID 20 (2/2) Propose to Accept. Revised Text March 2014 During the suspension phase, a CDMG STA that is scheduled to operate in the alternative channel shall switch to the dedicated channel and be ready to receive transmission from the AP or PCP in the dedicated channel. The CDMG STA may receive the CDMG Beacon frame or Announce frame transmitted by the AP or PCP to maintain synchronization with the AP or PCP during the suspension phase. If a CDMG STA receives a DELTS frame from the AP or PCP during the suspension phase, the CDMG STA will cease opportunistic transmission in the alternative channel. KB Png

Response to CID 21 Comment Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 21 Comment “A picture is worth a thousand words.” Suggested Remedy A figure to explain the various phases might be helpful. Propose to Accept. Include figure below Figure 9-46a—Opportunistic Transmission in Alternative Channels for CDMG STAs KB Png

Response to CID 22 (1/2) Comment Suggested Remedy March 2014 Response to CID 22 (1/2) Comment “The PCP/AP shall also ensure” "Ensure" is a bad word, i.e. is deprecated by IEEE-SA. Suggested Remedy Express the normative behaviour in what the AP shall do. i.e. "The AP shall schedule time for its communications with each associated STA during the AT." KB Png

Response to CID 22 (2/2) Propose to Accept. Revised Text March 2014 The AP or PCP shall send a DMG CTS-to-self frame in the ATIs (9.33.3) during the suspension phase to each of the CDMG STAs scheduled to operate in the alternative channel. If a CDMG STA receives one or more valid DMG or CDMG Beacon frame with a BSSID different from its own during the monitor phase, the CDMG STA shall response with a DELTS frame to the AP or PCP with the Reason Code field (8.4.1.7) set to 68 (the alternative channel is occupied) upon the reception of a DMG-CTS-to-self frame from the AP or PCP during the ATI. If a transmission link in the alternative channel cannot be established during the transmission phase, the CDMG STA shall response with a DELTS frame to the AP or PCP with the Reason Code field set to 67 (transmission link establishment in alternative channel failed). If the AP or PCP received a DELTS frame with the Reason Code field (8.4.1.7) set to 68 in a ATI, the AP or PCP will transmit a DELTS frame to each of the CDMG STAs scheduled to operate in the alternative channel in the same ATI or the subsequent ATI. KB Png

Response to CID 23 Comment Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 23 Comment “pair of devices” We have a whole lot of different names for devices. All communicating devices are at least STAs. There is no need to use a generic term when a more precise one is suitable, even if the more precise .” Suggested Remedy Review all 55 instances of "device" and replace by an appropriate term, such as "non-PCP/non-AP STA“. Propose to Accept. Devices is no longer used in revised text for section 9.33.11 KB Png

Response to CID 24 Comment Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 24 Comment “shall assume” This is always wrong. AP's don't assume anything, they are pieces of electronic kit. My cats assume things, and rarely understand normative verbs..” Suggested Remedy Express it in terms of what the AP does (i.e. observable actions), not in terms of what it assumes. Propose to Accept. Revised Text (Please see CID 22) KB Png

Response to CID 25 Comment Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 25 Comment “the devices are expected to transmit“ Passive voice is dangerous. Exactly who or what expects them to transmit? Exactly what does this un-identified entity do when they don't? Suggested Remedy Remove all use of passive voice in the draft. Propose to Accept. Revised Text (Please see CID 22) KB Png

Response to CID 28 (1/2) Comment March 2014 Response to CID 28 (1/2) Comment "Otherwise, the devices are expected to transmit a DELTS frame (8.5.3.4) to delete the allocated schedule and report the reason for the inability to complete the transmission." Which part of the STA decides to do this? Sending a DELTS is a management action, not part of the data plane. Generally the SME knows about allocations and timing and the MLME is fairly dumb (i.e. has minimal retained state)? KB Png

Response to CID 28 (2/2) Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 28 (2/2) Suggested Remedy Consider moving this behaviour to Clause 10 where it can be described as another reason to delete a schedule. It can be referenced from here. Reword so that the identify of the entity making the decision is not obscured, and its relation to the MLME-DELTS.* primitives is explicitly stated. Propose to Accept. The sending of the DELTS frame is now explicitly linked to a set of the conditions. Revised Text (Please see CID 22) KB Png

Response to CID 29 (1/2) Comment Suggested Remedy March 2014 Response to CID 29 (1/2) Comment “"shall periodically return" Not enough detail. For every "shall" statement, there should be enough detail to create a test for it. So how do you determine if a STA is doing this periodically? What are the upper and lower bounds for the period. If the answer is "none" then a period of 10**10 years is compliant, but not very observable. Suggested Remedy Turn requirement into one that can be tested. KB Png

Response to CID 29 (2/2) Propose to Accept. Revised Text March 2014 “If a CDMG STA is not the source or destination STA in an access period, it may switch to the dedicated channel to receive the CDMG Beacon frame or Announce frame send out by the AP or PCP to maintain synchronization with the AP or PCP.” “During the suspension phase, a CDMG STA that is scheduled to operate in the alternative channel shall switch to the dedicated channel and be ready to receive transmission from the AP or PCP in the dedicated channel. The CDMG STA may receive the CDMG Beacon frame or Announce frame transmitted by the AP or PCP to maintain synchronization with the AP or PCP during the suspension phase. If a CDMG STA receives a DELTS frame from the AP or PCP during the suspension phase, the CDMG STA will cease opportunistic transmission in the alternative channel.” KB Png

Response to CID 30 Comment Suggested Remedy Propose to Accept. March 2014 Response to CID 30 Comment "shall return" - the normative effect of returning is not well defined. Suggested Remedy Relate to observables, e.g., shall be able to receive from the PCP/AP in this channel during the scheduled slots. Propose to Accept. Revised Text (Please see CID 29) KB Png

Response to CID 31 (1/2) Comment Suggested Remedy March 2014 Response to CID 31 (1/2) Comment "If PCP/AP received the information that the alternative channel is occupied by another network" Relate to observables - i.e. fields and frames. Suggested Remedy Reword to cite specific fields in specific frames that provide this information. KB Png

Response to CID 31 (2/2) Propose to Accept. Revised Text March 2014 “The AP or PCP shall send a DMG CTS-to-self frame in the ATIs (9.33.3) during the suspension phase to each of the CDMG STAs scheduled to operate in the alternative channel. If a CDMG STA receives one or more valid DMG or CDMG Beacon frame with a BSSID different from its own during the monitor phase, the CDMG STA shall response with a DELTS frame to the AP or PCP with the Reason Code field (8.4.1.7) set to 68 (the alternative channel is occupied) upon the reception of a DMG-CTS-to-self frame from the AP or PCP during the ATI. If a transmission link in the alternative channel cannot be established during the transmission phase, the CDMG STA shall response with a DELTS frame to the AP or PCP with the Reason Code field set to 67 (transmission link establishment in alternative channel failed).” KB Png

Response to CID 32 (1/2) Comment Suggested Remedy March 2014 Response to CID 32 (1/2) Comment "" shall inform the rest of the devices" What form does this information take?" Suggested Remedy Relate to specific fields in specific frames. KB Png

Response to CID 32 (2/2) Propose to Accept. Revised Text March 2014 “If the AP or PCP received a DELTS frame with the Reason Code field (8.4.1.7) set to 68 in a ATI, the AP or PCP shall transmit a DELTS frame to each of the CDMG STAs scheduled to operate in the alternative channel in the same ATI.” KB Png

Response to CID 65 Comment Suggested Remedy March 2014 Response to CID 65 Comment Subclause 9.33 defined the rules for DMG STAs, But the subclause "9.33.11" is not for DMG device but for CDMG device.” Suggested Remedy change the title to "Opportunistic Transmission in Alternative Channels for CDMG“ Propose to Accept with a slight modification. change the title to "Opportunistic Transmission in Alternative Channels for CDMG STAs” Alternatively, Editor may create a new section that defines rules for CDMG STAs can be justified. KB Png

March 2014 Revised Text The complete revised text proposal for section 9.33.11 is provided in IEEE 802.11-14-0408r0. Suggest to replace Section 9.33.11 in TGaj draft specifications D0.01 with the revised text proposal. KB Png

March 2014 THANK YOU KB Png