Halton Housing Trust Customer Scrutiny Panel An introduction to our Service Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training Skills in note-making, summarising and report writing Module S5.
Advertisements

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Staff Feedback Event Welcome and Introduction Project Facilitator.
IAA focused on the E. coli cross- contamination guidance Introductions What we hope to cover today  Background to IAA and the benefits  The process.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
The Tricks of the Trade Yvonne Davies. Times are changing Tenant services authority (TSA) emphasis on financial regulation & governance TSA to become.
Customer Scrutiny 15 th July 2011 Jane Taylor - Customer Inspector Val Bagnall - Executive Director Being a Great landlord.
Head teacher Performance Management
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Learning Disability Partnership Board Choice and Control - update (LD Strategy 2011 – 2014) Doris Sheridan – October 2013 Learning Disability - People.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
The Draft SEN Code of Practice November What the Code is Nine chapters Statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3.
Co-regulation & Special Interest Groups Joanne Tilley, Executive Director Business Support.
COMPLAINTS POLICY JULY COMPLAINTS POLICY Why do we have this Policy? We are committed to delivering high quality services to all of our customers.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
The role of the NYSCB. a)to coordinate what is done by each person or body represented on the Board for the purposes of safeguarding and promoting the.
A Framework of Quality Assurance (FQA) for Responsible Officers and Revalidation Ahead of the Curve RO conference 4 June 2014.
Partner reward – a help or a hindrance to effective business development? Peter Scott Peter Scott Consulting
Preparing for the TSA Standards Chris Stock, Interim Head of Performance & Quality Assurance, Croydon Council Michael Hewlett, Vice Chair,Tenant & Leaseholder.
A new approach to resident involvement? Innovation Group presentation to City Assembly.
Hafod Through The Looking Glass Tenant Involvement in Self Assessment.
Performance management guidance
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Partnerships for the Future Implementing a sustainable framework of partnership working with service users and other partners Thursday 2 May 2013 Giving.
NHS ISLINGTON JSNA UPDATE JSNA Workshop 30 th September Presented by Rachel Maan.
Achieving Quality: Involving clients, staff and other stakeholders in quality audits Claire Tuffin, Head of Business Excellence.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Consultation Responses A Volunteer Guide For further information please contact:
He Ensuring Scrutiny makes a difference Shirley Gibson and Stina Foxford Value Improvement Panel (VIP) - October 2014
Governor Visits PaJeS Richard Tyndall NGA Consultant 10 th february 2015 © NGA
BTEC 1 NQF BTEC Foundation Diploma in Art and Design PLANNING.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Overall Quality Assurance, Selecting and managing external consultants and outsourcing Baku Training Module.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Neighbourhood Planning
EXERCISE EAST 2013 REVIEW AND EVALUATION MAY 2013.
Building Human Resource Management SkillsNational Food Service Management Institute 1 Delegating and Empowering Objectives At the completion of this module,
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Safety Management System Implementation Michael Niels Thorsen Moscow 15 September 2005.
Board Feedback Results Board Meeting Dallas April 2007 Board Feedback Results Governance Committee Report Presented at Los Angeles July 2007.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Government and Industry IT: one vision, one community Vice Chairs April Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions GAPs welcome meeting with ACT Board (John.
Scrutiny & Empowerment Partners in partnership with the NHC 11 th July 2011 Yvonne Davies Director.
THE ADVISORY AND SCRUTINY PANEL (ASP) Jean Robinson Chair person, ASP Mark Armstrong Head of Policy & Strategy, WPH.
Team Stages (Forming / norming /storming / performing / adjourning)
Council of Governors Meeting December 2013 Beverley Geary Director of Nursing.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
Connecting and collaborating with University departments to achieve a more impactful curriculum career education Anna Graves, Kim.
National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs "Fun, Learning and Achievement"
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
TAC: TAC meeting to be arranged. Plan, Assessment and Review Officer to attend (CO). Prepare Request : Lead Practitioner will collate all necessary evidence.
Top Tips Localism In Action Tip 1: Getting Started Use existing links to build a strong localism partnership across the CA area Be proactive,
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Well Trained International
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Presentation by Siobhan O’Kane River Clyde Homes
Appraisal of the Headteacher
Guidance notes for Project Manager
Strategy
The Tricks of the Trade Yvonne Davies.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Presentation transcript:

Halton Housing Trust Customer Scrutiny Panel An introduction to our Service Reviews

What we hope to achieve from a review The aim of any review will be first and foremost to ascertain if a service area is offering the best quality and value for money for the customer. The aim of any review will be first and foremost to ascertain if a service area is offering the best quality and value for money for the customer. To ensure that correct procedures are being carried out. To ensure that correct procedures are being carried out. To work with HHT Staff to improve their working environment. To work with HHT Staff to improve their working environment.

Communication Plan Communication will be key to any review. Communication will be key to any review. Asking the right person the right question and understanding the answer. Asking the right person the right question and understanding the answer. Keeping jargon and abbreviations to a minimum. Keeping jargon and abbreviations to a minimum. When it is necessary to use graphics to display information they should be clear, concise and consistent. When it is necessary to use graphics to display information they should be clear, concise and consistent.

Communication Plan The following is a list of the various groups of people we will endeavour to communicate with during a review and why we will be communicating with them. The following is a list of the various groups of people we will endeavour to communicate with during a review and why we will be communicating with them. The list is not in any order of preference and communication with all the people on the list is not mandatory for each review. The list is not in any order of preference and communication with all the people on the list is not mandatory for each review.

Halton Housing Trust Customers will be consulted in an effort to capture views and test awareness of the services offered by HHT. Halton Housing Trust Customers will be consulted in an effort to capture views and test awareness of the services offered by HHT. HHT Customer Forum will be asked to give feedback to help inform reviews. HHT Customer Forum will be asked to give feedback to help inform reviews. Stock Investment Group will be asked their opinion on matters relating to repairs and/or investment. Stock Investment Group will be asked their opinion on matters relating to repairs and/or investment. Tenants & Residents Groups throughout Halton may be consulted about opinions of particular service areas. Tenants & Residents Groups throughout Halton may be consulted about opinions of particular service areas.

Young peoples initiatives and local groups for young people across the Borough may be asked for their ideas and thoughts to gain a broader perspective. Young peoples initiatives and local groups for young people across the Borough may be asked for their ideas and thoughts to gain a broader perspective. Editorial Panel will be asked to promote the work of the scrutiny panel and also to offer suggestions as to how we design and deliver various aspects of our reviews. Editorial Panel will be asked to promote the work of the scrutiny panel and also to offer suggestions as to how we design and deliver various aspects of our reviews. Customer Inspectors will be used to test services, consult with customers and feed back their findings to the scrutiny panel. Customer Inspectors will be used to test services, consult with customers and feed back their findings to the scrutiny panel.

Lead Board Member for the particular service area under review will be kept abreast of how the review is progressing. This is so effective working relationships can be maintained and the Lead Board Members views on the finding of the review can be ascertained. Lead Board Member for the particular service area under review will be kept abreast of how the review is progressing. This is so effective working relationships can be maintained and the Lead Board Members views on the finding of the review can be ascertained. Chair and CEO are an integral part of keeping the lines of communication open in order to facilitate the work of the Board and Senior Management Team. Also this will negate any duplication of effort on key projects/service areas. Chair and CEO are an integral part of keeping the lines of communication open in order to facilitate the work of the Board and Senior Management Team. Also this will negate any duplication of effort on key projects/service areas.

Full Board will be presented with the findings from each review. Full Board will be presented with the findings from each review. Relevant Head of Service for the service area to be reviewed will be consulted to obtain information about the service area under review and to feedback findings in advance of the review going to Board. Relevant Head of Service for the service area to be reviewed will be consulted to obtain information about the service area under review and to feedback findings in advance of the review going to Board. Communications Officer will be utilised by the panel to promote and publicise our role and the results of our review. Communications Officer will be utilised by the panel to promote and publicise our role and the results of our review. Customer Involvement Team will be use to identify training needs and source training of the panel. Customer Involvement Team will be use to identify training needs and source training of the panel.

HHT Staff and Teams will be asked for their opinion about the service area under review so that the panel can reach a clear understanding about service delivery, performance, quality and costs. HHT Staff and Teams will be asked for their opinion about the service area under review so that the panel can reach a clear understanding about service delivery, performance, quality and costs. Ward Councillors across the Borough will be asked for their views of issues emerging during their ward surgeries that may be relevant to HHT and be an indicator or trigger for a service area review. Ward Councillors across the Borough will be asked for their views of issues emerging during their ward surgeries that may be relevant to HHT and be an indicator or trigger for a service area review.

Overview of the process Step One: Fact finding. Step Two: Compare & Challenge. Step Three: Analyse & Recommend. Step Four: Implementation & Review.

Step One Breakdown The service area to be reviewed is decided Halton Housing Trust is informed of service area to be reviewed and timetable for review. Initial meeting with the relevant service manager is arranged. Briefing for initial meeting is offered to service manager. Initial meeting with Service Manager takes place, questions about the service and further information are requested.

Step One Breakdown The Panel requests and reviews Customer feedback, complaints, cost and performance data. The Panel decides which specific components of the service area to be reviewed will be focused on. Panel then meets with the relevant Lead Board Member to discuss the scope and timetable of the review.

Step Two Breakdown Requests for additional/follow on information following initial meeting with Service manager are made. Arrangements for Panel Members services/transactions from start to finish and shadow staff. Panel will meet with staff who are involved with service delivery to gauge their opinion about where the service is working well and where improvement could be made.

Step Two Breakdown A Panel member will attend the relevant Departmental Balanced Scorecard Meeting. Customer Inspectors will be tasked to carry out reality checks e.g. estate and void visits, mystery shopping. Panel members will carry out telephone surveys of customers who have used the service under review during the previous 3- 6months. HHT Performance will be benchmarked using Housemark and other performance sources such as Tenant Advisor.

Step Two Breakdown Panel will research good practice of top performers after benchmarking data is collated. All the parts of Step Two are brought together to give an overview of the service area being reviewed; which areas are performing well and which need improvement. Thoughts about how improvements could be made. Meet with Head of Service and Lead Board Member to discuss findings.

Step Three Breakdown The Panel presents recommendations in priority order. The Panel meets with a member of the Policy and Performance team to discuss the recommendations and how outcomes will be measured. The Panel meets with Service Manager to present a draft report. Meet with Lead Board Member to discuss findings and recommendations.

Step Three Breakdown The final report is submitted for inclusion on Board Agenda. This should be 2-3 weeks before the date of the Board Meeting. Lead Scrutineer attends Board Meeting to present recommendations. If Board object to Panels recommendations Board will provide a full explanation in writing with supporting evidence. Lead Scrutineer will then meet with Chair of the Board to discuss. Panel may seek independent advice and arbitration if compromise cannot be reached with the Board.

Step Four Breakdown Within two weeks of the Board meeting (or the resolution of any objections by Board.) officers will be required to present and action plan incorporating the Panels recommendations. If acceptable the action plan will be signed off by the Panel. Officers will provide quarterly updates in connection of the implementation of the action plan. Once all agreed recommendations have been implemented, the Panel will complete a final evaluation of outcomes for customers resulting from the service change.