Karen Ruple and Beth Brophy MSIFN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Advertisements

The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Michigan Merit Examination ELA Assessment Analysis Presented by: Dr. Joan Livingston.
NCOSP Learning Community Forum March 2007 Science Curriculum Topic Study Examining Student Thinking.
Coaching for School Improvement: A Guide for Coaches and Their Supervisors An Overview and Brief Tour Karen Laba Indistar® Summit September 2, 2010.
Using Data to Inform Instruction
Title page. 1. Identify the Problem Write a statement that answers the following questions. What are you trying to design? What are the requirement gaps?
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Data Driven Dialogue: Practical Strategies for Collaborative Inquiry
RTI SUMMIT APRIL 28, 2010 GAIL JESSETT, SPOKANE PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEBBIE LAHUE, NORTHEAST WA ESD 101 Coaching Within Your Team Becoming Each Other’s Best.
DLP Assignments October 23, 2013 Karen Lea Branch NCSU NELA Cohort III.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
Narrowing to a Manageable Handful of 21 st Century Skills Instructional Support Services: OCM BOCES Patrick Shaw, Lynn Radicello, Penny Williams, Jeff.
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
Good Morning Inver Grove Heights Year Two: Leading For Excellence.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
School Planning Councils Collaborative Inquiry to Improve Student Achievement with Bruce Wellman Webcast February 16, 2005 Host: BC Ministry of Education.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Elementary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
Jere Baxter Middle Vision, Mission, and Values Karen Flowers Teresa Hogue Margie L. Johnson, Ed.D. August 2, 2016.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Moving from Reactive to Proactive:
National Public Health Performance Standards Program: A Users Perspective Judy Monroe, MD Indiana State Health Commissioner APHA Annual Meeting November.
Problem Solving Process.
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. November 29, 2016
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Una Elementary Leadership Meeting
Board Standards and School Board Self-Assessment
CHAPTER11 Project Risk Management
JE Moss Elementary Leadership Meeting
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Welcome … and sit within Grade Levels (ES, MS, HS)
Cole Elementary Math BHAG Action Planning
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 4, 2017
Culture and Climate Data Dive
Using Collaborative Inquiry to Empower Culture and Climate Change
Jones Paideia Poverty Simulation Follow-Up Meeting
Assessment and Instructional Planning
From Identifying to Supporting All Learners
May 19, 2017 Margie Johnson, Ed.D. Business Intelligence Coordinator
Central Office Poverty Simulation Follow-Up Meeting
July 26, 2017 Margie Johnson, Ed.D. Collaborative Inquiry Coordinator
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Deer Valley USD Work Team November 15, 2017
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. October 11, 2016
Problem solving Strategies
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Two Rivers Collaborative Inquiry Data Meeting
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Welcome Please sit in groups of 3 or 4. Thanks. October 10, 2016
Please sit in a group. Thanks! January 10, 2018 Margie Johnson, Ed.D.
Chicago Public Schools
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 4, 2017
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 10 & 25, 2017
DuPont Tyler Middle Mission and Vision
Lakeview Elem Leadership Team Meeting
Culture and Climate Data Dive
Learning Technology Core Team Meeting
Murrell TELL Survey Data Dive
John Early Middle Mission and Vision
Data Analysis through Data Driven Dialogue
Using Collaborative Inquiry Process for Providing Feedback
Presentation transcript:

Karen Ruple and Beth Brophy MSIFN 10-13-15 Exploring the Blueprint Problem Solving Driver with a Data Conversations Protocol Karen Ruple and Beth Brophy MSIFN 10-13-15

Exploring Existing Data Sources Purpose: Honor the data districts have already collected District Systems Review Or AdvancED Self-Assessment ERS Resource Check Other

Table Team For today’s Simulation You are a district level team who has six buildings (3 Elementary, 1 MS and 1 HS) 1 Elementary and MS are Priority, HS is Focus Assume the following roles Superintendent Curriculum/Title I Director Human Resources Director Elementary Principal (may have up to three of these) MS Principal HS Principal Imagine that you are responding as you imagine a person in this role might respond during the simulation

Data Conversation Protocol for Reviewing Existing Sources of Data Data Conversation Protocol for Reviewing Existing Data Sources – Document #1 (yellow) Scan the protocol Uses the Collaborative Learning Cycle as the basis of the data conversation (Wellman and Lipton, 2012) Phase I: Active and Engage Generate predictions & surface assumptions Phase II: Explore and Discover Analyze data & develop narrative statements Phase III: Organize and Integrate Generating causal theory and exploring solutions

Phase I: Active and Engage What is the system driver? Problem Solving Protocol First, build a common understanding of the problem solving driver. Read and discuss the definition, Evidence of Practice, Rationale and research for this system driver. Problem Solving Protocol Using Multiple Measures of Data Handout #2 (other side of yellow handout) Now, focus on the Evidence of Practice. Indicate if you think the practice has been effectively implemented throughout the entire system. This is meant to be a quick assessment of the Evidence of Practice listed. Has each practice been effectively implemented throughout the entire system? Individually indicate Yes or No and then compile the team results.

Phase II: Explore and Discover Brainstorm data that you already have data that verifies your quick assessment? Read the Bridge to Existing Sources of Data: Problem Solving Protocol Using Multiple Measures of Data (handout #3- green) This document identifies connections between the Blueprint Problem Solving Protocol and the DSR, SA and ERS. Focus on the District Systems Review column Six standards are identified

Phase III: Organize and Integrate Now examine your District Requirements Report or District Systems Review (Handout #4 – white) First review the summary on the last page. Compare this to your team’s initial quick assessment of the Evidence of Practice for the Problem Solving Protocol. Consider how your District Systems Review ratings might provide you with information about current reality.

Phase II: Organize and Integrate Next review each of the standards to determine what characteristics and evidence you indicated you had for each standard. How does the data you reviewed support or not support your initial assessment of the Evidence of Practice statements? Based on your data review and analysis, do you have a fully implemented and effective system in place? Does everyone in your organization have the same understanding around how this system functions?

Phase III: Organize and Integrate Do you have a fully implemented and effective Problem Solving Protocol in place? Does everyone in your organization have the same understanding around how this Problem Solving Protocol functions? Is the Problem Solving Protocol being used effectively by all members of your organization? Yes? Wonderful!! No? – Use the Problem Solving Planning Tool to enhance or build an effective system

Planning Tool for Problem Solving Protocol

What questions do you have? Karen Ruple ruplek@michigan.gov Beth Brophy, MI Excel brophye@calhounisd.org