Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27th 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
Advertisements

The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
National Commission for Evaluation, Transparency and Integrity of Public Administrations National Anti-corruption Authority (CiVIT) Rome, December 2012.
Examples of Best Practices: Anti- corruption Strategy of the TCA Musa KAYRAK Senior Auditor, CISA.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Harriet Namisi Programme Coordinator: Policy Analysis - Governance The Development Network of Indigenous Voluntary Associations, (DENIVA) Introduction.
Scoping study for Improving Transparency through Citizen Charters in Serbia Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27 th 2010.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
Using the UN Convention against Corruption as a Basis for Good Governance.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Institutional framework for supporting civil society development in Croatia A PLAN C FOR EUROPE: CITIZENSHIP, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, CIVIL DIALOGUE 17 September.
© SMWI, 2005 The Re-use of PSI policy, Legal Framework and Good Practice in EU and Romania, Bucharest, 8th June 2005 Wojtek SADOWICZ TROUBLESHOOTING THE.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
Re – use of PSI in Slovenia Kristina Kotnik Šumah Deputy of the Information Commisoner.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
Media Projects Marija Gaćeša and Violeta Ćorić Belgrade, 1 st October Ministry of Finance.
A REPORT ON GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 1999 SUMMIT RESOLUTIONS : 26 TH MARCH 2003 A review and revision of legislation COMBATING CORRUPTION A review.
2009/10/06 STUDY ON RECOGNITION OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Alternative title slide.
Problems and challenges in the implementation of anti-corruption activities Drago KOS President of the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, Slovenia.
Astana Economic forum - May 2012 Prevention of corruption systems and institutional frameworks Francesco Checchi, UNDP Anti Corruption Specialist.
Working Group Four Regional Norm-building: considering regional instruments and standards In light of the existing regional instruments, this group considered.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Corporate Governance. What is Corporate Governance ? Corporate Governance refers to the structures & processes for the efficient.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool MODULE 11 “POA 9: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY”
Ministry of State Administration and Administrative Reform, Republic of Bulgaria 18 February 2008 Brdo, Slovenia 18 February 2008 Brdo, Slovenia Contribution.
Institutional Strengthening Strategy of the National Anticorruption Centre Ion NASTAS, Ph.D.
Access to Information: Bolivia Main Headline Goes Here Special Meeting of the Juridical and Political Affairs OAS December 13, 2010 Laura Neuman Access.
The MESICIC Experience & Civil Society Participation.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.
Hallgrímur Snorrason Management seminar on global assessment Session 6: Institutional and legal framework of the national statistical system Yalta
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
TIBiH engagement in improving the public procurement system in BiH
7th ASEAN COMPETITION CONFERENCE 8-9 March 2017, Malaysia “ASEAN’s Young Competition Agencies – The Tough Get Going” Dato’ Ahmad Hisham Kamaruddin Member.
Regulatory Impact Assessment in Poland
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
Country Level Programs
UNECE International Forum on Trade Facilitation
Excellent university for the researchers
IIASA Governance Review
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Parliament and the National Budget Process
Partnership in Developing OGP in Georgia
Session 2: Institutional arrangements for energy statistics
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Построение культуры integrity в компании Aнар Каримов партнёр «ЭКВИТА»
Programme of the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria (draft)
Setting Actuarial Standards
Overview of the Legal Framework for the cooperation of CSOs and public authorities Casablanca, 4-5 September 2013 Workshop on the Models to Promote Cooperation.
Professionalisation leads to better governance and Public Financial Management Gillian Fawcett May 2018.
Politics & ethics in governance
Introduction to the training
EU ACCESSION CRITERIA AS SET UP BY THE COUNCIL OF THE EU
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
The policy framework for cooperation Casablanca, 4-5 September 2013 Workshop on the Models to Promote Cooperation between Civil Society and Government.
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
How to Ensure Effective Implementation of a Competition law ?
Civil society guide on working with the UNCAC
UNCAC Chapter II Overview Prevention of Corruption under the United Nations Convention against Corruption 8-10 April 2019 Addis Ababa.
Civil society guide on working with the UNCAC
SECURITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT
Presentation transcript:

Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27th 2010 Scoping study for Improving Transparency through Citizen Charters in Serbia Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27th 2010

Basic information about Scoping study Supported by UK Ministry of foreign affairs – Programme Office / Foreign & Commonwealth Office Implemented by Transparency Serbia Timeframe: August 2010 / March 2011 Purpose: To map legal framework, recommend further actions, raise awareness through Citizen Charters

“Citizen’s Charter” as concept - UK The Citizen's Charter was political initiative launched by UK prime minister, John Major on 22 July 1991. It aimed to improve public services in the UK by: Making administration accountable and citizen friendly. Ensuring transparency and the right to information. Taking measures to cleanse and motivate civil service. Adopting a stakeholder approach. Saving time of both executant and the clientelee One part of the initiative was the granting of “Charter Marks" to those public bodies meeting defined standards. Source: Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia

“Citizen’s Charters” as concept Anti-corruption efforts usually incorporate elements intended to develop, establish and promote basic standards for ethical conduct and good practices. In this context, citizens’ charters and similar documents can be seen as complementary to codes of conduct. Where codes of conduct set and enforce standards from within public sector organizations, citizens’ charters establish those same standards from outside, by codifying the standards and making outsiders who deal with the organization in question aware of them. Often they are composed in terms of rights or legitimate expectations, in the sense that consumers or users of a service are told that they have a right to expect certain specified standards. In some cases a remedy may be provided for where the standards are not met, and consumers are usually told how to complain. Source: UNODC, Anti-corruption Toolkit, 2004

“Citizen’s Charters” as concept The key objectives of citizens’ charters are: To promote better government that provides high quality, efficient and effective public services and regulation, delivered in an accountable, open, accessible and responsive way; and To maintain and enhance professional and ethical standards of the civil service and non-departmental public bodies and promote high standards of accountability and openness in the wider public sector. Source: UNODC, Anti-corruption Toolkit, 2004

Background of project Publishing information about the work of public institutions and the services that institutions should provide to citizens is a very effective tool to increase the transparency and accountability of institutions’ work, and consequently to prevent corruption. Serbia has basic legal pre-conditions to develop concept for pro-active informing about services under the Law on Free Access to Information (duty of public authorities to publish Informative Directories) and the National Anti-corruption Strategy (duty to increase the transparency of the work of public authorities and to create an effective system for grievances). However, the concept is still underdeveloped and could be significantly improved. There is no comprehensive analyzes of legal duties of public institutions to publish information about services they are providing to the citizens nor about eventual improvements in the field made under scope of anti-corruption strategic documents. The public shows general interest for the lack of information about work of public institutions but lacks comprehensive way of citizens engagement.

Scoping study - Activities Activity 1. Research Collecting and analyzing of information about other countries experience in developing of Citizen charters’ and similar models. Collecting and analyzing of information about legal framework that regulates duty to publish information about work of public institutions and in particular about service providing (what is mandatory to publish, what is restricted from publishing etc.) The research will cover duties coming from Free access to information law, but would also cover other legislation. Drafting of recommendations for improvements and further action. Analyzes of anti-corruption strategic acts (National anti-corruption strategy, Action plan and eventually adopted sectoral action plans) in order to establish duties related to publishing of information and publicity of work of public sector. Drafting of recommendations for improvements and further action. Data collecting and analyzes of respect of duties of public institution to publish information on services provided to the citizens within the current legal framework (in particular through Informative directory)

Scoping study - Activities 2. Public awareness and advocacy activities Two press – conferences in order to present findings of analyzes to the public of Serbia Three roundtable discussions with stakeholders in order to promote results of analyzes and recommendations for improvements (in order to promote researches and advocate for changes of legislation and practice) – covering: 1) foreign experiences with Citizen’s charters, 2) Legal framework for Citizen charters in Serbia and 3) implementation of Strategic anti-corruption plans Advocacy for creation of better environment for establishment and implementation of Citizens’ charters in Serbia (drafting and public promotion of initiatives to change legal and strategic acts) Drafting of publication

What after Scoping study? Improvement of legal framework Improvement of pro-active on-line publishing of information related to the services (e.g. Informative Directories, e-government Portal) Linking of Citizen Charters with Integrity plans of public institutions Providing training or consultations to public institutions and civil services in charge

Follow-up activities Monitoring of compliance with legal duties and initiating of remedial actions against offenders (e.g. misdemeanor procedures) Functioning of “citizen charters” in practice – e.g. to which extent are deadlines respected Promotion of concept among citizenry Advocacy to put citizen charters and broader concept of good governance on political agenda