Evaluation from a Corridor perspective: methods and results Merja Penttinen, VTT 20-7-2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is the EU Budgets role for the EU internal market? Jorge Nunez Ferrer Conference Europe in the Global Economy.
Advertisements

Kicking off Innovation Capacities through Regional cooperation in the Western Balkan Region Zoran Aralica, the Institute of Economics, Zagreb
Pete Thomas Professor in Road and Vehicle Safety Vehicle Safety Research Centre Loughborough University, UK A review of ITS and their safety.
Open Days European Week of Regions and Cities Blue Book - Guide to cost benefit analysis in transport sector JASPERS: Bringing Major Projects to Maturity.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Ohio Planning Conference Organizing for Reliability – A State Perspective.
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme CAST Plenary Meeting 30 September.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Meeting AECOM, AM SOP-T, CFR, JASPERS
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT COSIMA-ROAD - Modelling Decision Support and Uncertainty.
DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS A Collision Countermeasures Presentation.
Utrecht School of Economics Tackling Money Laundering – Conference
TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 26-Sep-08 Transport Modelling Microsimulation Software.
CHAPTER 19: HOW ACCURATE IS CBA? Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of CBA.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
Presentation to Pre-Sessional Consultations on the IPCC TAR Milan, Italy November 2003 BRIAN CHALLENGER ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA.
Dynamic Speed Limits to improve local air quality Henk Stoelhorst Rijkswaterstaat, Centre for Transport and Navigation.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Table reports Working with multi-modal travel planners Copenhagen October, 2008.
CREATING THE CASE FOR MORE TRAVEL CHOICES John Bartels, City of Port Phillip and Ainsley Nigro, GHD Cost Benefit Analysis for Implementing Separated Bike.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
Accessibility project in Denmark Phase 1 - Collect data, define congestion, establish methods to estimate congestion and the marginal congestion costs.
ILO Department of Statistics1 ILO experience in quickly estimating the impact of financial crisis on the global labour market International Seminar on.
A Model for Improving Operations through Archived Data 2005 ITS America Annual Meeting Mark Carter – SAIC Robert Haas - SAIC May 2 nd, 2005 i Florida’s.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (IWW),
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
MESH Chapter 6 “Other issues” Duncan Millard Vienna; 4 October 2012.
Regulatory road maps for the integration of an increasing amount of variable DG/RES-E Jeroen de Joode / Adriaan van der Welle / Frits van Oostvoorn Energy.
Transport ABRPlus in Transport HLG on Administrative Burden 30 January 2014.
Regional Policy Ex post Evaluation of the Cohesion Fund and ISPA in period Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy Evalaution network.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Robert Brydia Project Lead, I-35 Traveler Information During Construction Texas A&M Transportation Institute WORK ZONES & LARGE TRUCKS THE CENTRAL TEXAS.
Risto Kulmala News from EasyWay. EasyWay CEDR O1 Stockholm 12 Feb EasyWay Deployment of European ITS Services on TERN 21+3 countries (EU+oth) Road.
Marketing Planning.
1 Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) ex post evaluation Jurate Vaznelyte, Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, April 14 th.
Presented by Macroeconomic Policy Division June 2015 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Economic Forecasts.
Evaluation of ITS applications on the Køge Bugt Motorway, Denmark Jens Toft Wendelboe Technical Consultant Traffic Management Department Danish Road Directorate.
Funding Proposal Basics April Nigh Rotaract Meeting, November 9, 2009.
- Cities for Innovation in Road Safety – A Traffic Safety Plan for Dresden „Friedrich List“ Faculty for Transportation and Traffic Sciences, Institute.
14/02/20081 Urban mobility Griet De Ceuster. 14/02/20082 CONTENTS Mobility concepts in a city: technologies in a mobility perspective Challenges for implementation.
Workshop on Disproportionate Costs, 10./ Copenhagen Summary and draft conclusions 11 April 2008.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
Real-Time Information and Response Jon Nelson, P.E. MoDOT.
Restructuring of the Finnish Infrastructure Administration Draft
Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather Summer 2016 Meeting
EasyWay - conclusion.
DATEX Activity 6 Enhanced Usability
Economic and Financial Analysis of Geospatial Information: The Albania Case Study March 21, 2017 Annual World Bank Land & Poverty Conference Aanchal.
national scope = unique IE opportunity
L. Radulov, A. Nikolaev Black Sea Regional Energy Centre
Regional Roads Committee
ITS and Roads in ireland present and future
Asset management based on history of real time traffic information
General presentation of SMART GROUND project
Enabling multi-modality and efficient freight logistics
Goals and assumptions of the research
Thomas Jaegers and Håkan Linden
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Jose GONZALEZ PASTOR Economic & Adequacy Analyst - Elia
Evelina Sabatella NISEA soc. coop.
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, February 2010
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Infrastructure investments – source of future well-being
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation from a Corridor perspective: methods and results Merja Penttinen, VTT 20-7-2019

NEXT-ITS corridor overview Total length ~3000km NEXT-ITS 1&2 services coverage ~25 000km Main measures improved TMC operations Received CEF-funding Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Services vs. measures, example NEXT-ITS 2 Service(s) improved by the measure Measure(s) per Country Forecast and real-time event Information Service Traffic Condition and Travel Time Information Service Weather Information Service Safety Related Traffic Information Service Dynamic Lane Management Variable Speed Limits Incident Warning and Management Ramp Metering Traffic Management Plans for Corridors and Networks Measure 1 – TMC renewal and adaptation to corridor management and control systems, FI X   Measure 2 – Motorway Control System, SE Measure 3 - Integrated Traffic Management, SE Measure 4 - New Traffic Management Centre in “The Traffic Tower” in Copenhagen, DK Measure 5 - Traffic Management Plans and Ramp Metering Systems, DE Measure 6 - Traffic Centre Schleswig-Holstein, DE Measure 7 - DATEX-II improvements for Action C, NO Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Measures vs. services details Finnish example: Altogether 6 services were covered by one measure: improving TMC operations (new integrated central traffic management system) Benefiting 5 different networks: The most improved one including all 6 services The widest network including only weather information service -> CBA calculations included all benefiting networks Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

CBA calculations - overview Central system improvements make the calculations challenging One cannot really compare before – after situations as such Benefit estimates always require a lot of background information and expert evaluations Relevant ex-post evaluation studies were searched and summarized as a background National unit values vary quite a lot Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Expert part of the evaluation Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

National unit values Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Overall result of NEXT-ITS2 The total estimated effects of the services are considerable The total value of the annual benefits in 2017 will be circa 15 M€. Implementation costs are of circa 33 M€ including VAT and thereby comparable to the benefits (the costs without VAT amount to almost 27 M€). The annual operation and maintenance costs were estimated to be 3 M€, -> the NEXT-ITS 2 can be assessed to be socio-economically profitable. Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Financial support as an enabler/driver CEF funding requires projects to be deployed even without EU funding 10 – 20% additional funding helps in Measures to cover more services -> better impacts in networks, of even new roads to be covered Service quality to be improved -> potential enhancement of effects Services to be deployed faster -> benefits to be reached faster One could estimate that in other types of projects receiving more remarkable support -> support has even bigger role as an enabler Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Discussion of NEXT-ITS2 evaluation methodology The sensitivity analysis shows that the benefits calculated vary a lot dependent on the most important input parameters. However, it can be concluded that even with conservative estimates, NEXT-ITS 2 has a positive net impact. It needs to be pointed out that the effect estimates are based on a desk-top analysis, which needs to be compared to the actual statistics from the NEXT-ITS 2 corridor and the national networks affected. Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Conclusions It is clear that the effects of this kind of services are extremely difficult to measure (ex-post) especially in this era of technology disruption due to connected and automated driving, the internet of things, digitalization, etc. Thereby, even the ex-post evaluation needs to be accompanied with a desk-top analysis similar to the ex-ante assessment reported here. Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

Utrecht, 14 and 15 November