CO 2 Sequestration in Gas Shales of Kentucky Brandon C. Nuttall, James A. Drahovzal, Cortland F. Eble, R. Marc Bustin U.S. DOE/NETL DE-FC26-02NT41442 AAPG.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Advertisements

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

$100 $400 $300$200$400 $200$100$100$400 $200$200$500 $500$300 $200$500 $100$300$100$300 $500$300$400$400$500.

$100 $400 $300$200$400 $200$100$100$400 $200$200$500 $500$300 $200$500 $100$300$100$300 $500$300$400$400$500.

Thomas Härtl, IPP, Measurement of Gas Retention in AUG, WP10-PWI /II/BS, 19. July Measurement of Gas Retention in ASDEX Upgrade - A Technical.

Round 2! Double Jeopardy Calorim- etry Energy Changes in Heat Vocab Thermo Fun FJ.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category.

Category Category Category Category Category.

Mr. Smith Cat. 1Cat. 2Cat. 3Cat

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Solution of Benchmark Problems for CO 2 Storage Min Jin, Gillian Pickup and Eric Mackay Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering.

Unit 1 Enthalpy.

Ideal Gas Law PV=nRT.

Gas NMR Characterization of Oil Shale

Gas Hydrate An Emerging Resource for Americas Energy Future Art Johnson Hydrate Energy International.

Gas Laws The Combined Gas Law:

An Introduction to Coalbed Methane Special Session 31: Presented by: Tony Ma, Hycal Energy Research Laboratories BACK to BASIC Series,

Year 10 C Pathway Mr. D. Patterson. Outcomes Convert from moles to volume of a gas (and vice versa) at standard temperature and pressure Use the conversion.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Category Heading Category Heading Category Heading.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Visite my blog : ichwan.co.nr for your summeries and tasks Kinetic Theory of Gases Part II The ideal Gas Pressure.

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,

HIGHER GRADE CHEMISTRY CALCULATIONS Reacting Volumes. Since one mole of any gas occupies the same volume under the same conditions of temperature and pressure.

The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale. What Is The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale? The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS) is a sedimentary rock formation that consists of organic-rich.

FutureGen in Kentucky A slide show explaining a KGS preliminary assessment of geologic sequestration potential for future power plants in.

99 學年度第一學期專題討論 99 學年度第一學期專題討論 Sorption of methane and CO 2 for enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration Prusty, B. K., 2008.

TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.

Mineralogical and TOC Trends in the Ohio Utica Shale Jake Harrington Dr. Julie Sheets, Dr. Dave Cole, Dr. Sue Welch, Mike Murphy, Alex Swift SEMCAL.

Tim Armitage.  Shale Gas Reservoir's  The problems with Shale Reservoirs  What is needed to Create a usable model  Possible solutions to Porosity.

1. Introduction Study Area Objectives Literature review Methodology Results Conclusions 2.

Evaluation of Water Resources for Hydraulic Fracturing in the Barnett Shale Mary Hingst GISWR Fall 2011.

OIL SHALE – contains Kerogen Tar sands – contain bitumen.

David Cheng/Carbon Management GIS, LFEE, MIT Carbon Capture and Sequestration Analysis of Options WESTCARB Annual Meeting October 28, 2004 David Cheng.

Advanced Resources International 1 Washington and Oregon: Deep Coal Seam CO 2 Sequestration Potential Scott H. Stevens, Greg Bank Advanced Resources International,

National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.

Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance.

Pseudopressure Function

Current Issues in Geological Storage Mark Wilkinson, University of Edinburgh.

Analysis of the Devonian Shale in Kentucky for Potential CO 2 Sequestration and Enhanced Natural Gas Production Brandon C. Nuttall, James A. Drahovzal,

U.S. Shale Gas Resources, Reserves and $$$ John B. Curtis Potential Gas Agency Colorado School of Mines.

Bode Omoboya 16 th May,  Introduction  Bakken Shale Case Study  Barnett Shale Case Study  Other Forward Modeling Projects.

GIS Methods for Reservoir Assessment and Estimating CO 2 Sequestration Capacities Brandon C. Nuttall GSA, Denver, Colorado 10-Nov-2004.

Carbon Dioxide Dr. Reid B. Grigg New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, New Mexico.

Specify chemical composition of fluid and formation minerals from the Initial pane. Set initial temperatureSet starting and ending times.

Ohio Energy Project June 26, 2013 The State of Exploration and Production in the United States.

CO 2 Sequestration in Coal Seams B. K. Prusty Ph. D. (USA) Scientist Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research.

Susan Pool Ray Boswell J. Eric Lewis Jonathan P. Mathews WVGES USDOE/NETL WVGES Penn State.

CO 2 -sequestration in abandoned coal mines Kris Piessens & Michiel Dusar Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Geological Survey of Belgium In order.

CO 2 storage capacity estimates for South Africa: The uncertainties and way forward J.H.A. Viljoen, M. Cloete, F.D.J. Stapelberg and N. Hicks.

Coal Bed Methane by Widodo W. Purwanto a Departemen Teknik Kimia b Pengkajian Energi Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia.

Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.

1 Formation Evaluation Exercise For Subsurface Methods Geology Course 4233 By Richard Andrews March 5, 2009.

“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.

M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,

SHALE OIL EXTRACTION AND CO2 SEQUESTRATION BY A NOVEL METHOD OF HOT GAS INJECTION Michael Youtsos – Energy Group Cambridge University Engineering Department.

Dave Harris Energy and Minerals Section May 13, 2016

Geologic Sequestration: the Big Picture Estimation of Storage Capacity or How Big is Big Enough Susan Hovorka, Srivatsan Lakshminarasimhan, JP Nicot Gulf.

Appalachian storage Hub (ASH) project

A New Coal-Permeability Model:

Recent Advances in Well-Based Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration

Potential for Geological Carbon Sequestration using deep saline aquifers in the Illinois Basin GIS Term Project Julien Botto.

by Wolf Tilmann Pfeiffer, Christof Beyer, and Sebastian Bauer

Pseudopressure Function

Dave Harris Energy and Minerals Section May 13, 2016

POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.

Presentation transcript:

CO 2 Sequestration in Gas Shales of Kentucky Brandon C. Nuttall, James A. Drahovzal, Cortland F. Eble, R. Marc Bustin U.S. DOE/NETL DE-FC26-02NT41442 AAPG Calgary June 19-22, 2005

Why Black Shales? Distribution and potential storage volumeDistribution and potential storage volume Known producerKnown producer –Gas adsorbed on kerogen and clay Analogous to CBM?Analogous to CBM?

Basic Research: Feasibility CO 2 sorption capacityCO 2 sorption capacity CH 4 displacement potentialCH 4 displacement potential

Devonian Shale in Kentucky Estimated gas in place: 63 to 112 tcf Present in subsurface >=1000 deep and >=100 thick Producing area

Big Sandy Reservoir Info Completion interval >500Completion interval >500 Average porosity 4.3%Average porosity 4.3% Max. porosity 11%Max. porosity 11% Temperature 84 o FTemperature 84 o F Average pressure 400 psiAverage pressure 400 psi Permeability <0.1 mdPermeability <0.1 md Atlas of Major Appalachian Gas Plays, 1996

Typical Reservoir Conditions for CO 2 Injection Critical Point Saturation Line Melting Line Temp (ºF) Pressure (psia) Solid Liquid Gas

Geologic Column Surface 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Coal measures, mixed sand, shale, and coal. Salt sands Pennington: Sand and shale Big Lime: Carbonate Pennsylvanian Mississippian Devonian Borden: Sand and shale Ohio: Carbonaceous black shale 3,800 +/- of mixed sand, shale, and carbonate provide adequate reservoir seal. Composite thickness data from Knott and Leslie County wells and Dillman and Ettensohn (1980)

Shale Overview Mississippian Borden Cleveland Devonian Ohio Shale Berea Sunbury Three Lick Bed Upper Huron Middle Huron Lower Huron Olentangy 3-component system3-component system –Quartz –Clay –Organic matter 3-component system3-component system –Quartz –Clay –Organic matter } Clastic GR Density

Cross section LAS file AdsorptionBoth Study Area

Average Organic Content Total Organic Carbon

Mean Random Reflectance Upper oil window and wet gas/condensates R 0 random x ~ R 0 max Frequency

Devonian Shale Adsorption Isotherms Standard cubic feet per ton CO 2 CH 4

Adsorption at 400 PSIA Adsorbed gas (standard cubic feet per ton of shale) Average CH 4 : 8.1 scf/ton Average CO 2 : 42.9 scf/ton CO 2 = 5.3 x CH 4 Frequency

CO 2 Adsorption at 400 PSIA r 2 = 0.80 CO 2 scf/ton = 7.9 x TOC

CNR Elk Horn

Cleveland Three Lick Upper Huron Middle Huron Lower Huron Olentangy Sunbury Borden Berea Sidewall cores for adsorption and CH 4 displacement

ECS Shale Analysis Clays BoundWater Kerogen GasSaturation TotalPhi Adsorbed Gas (scf) TotalGas(scf) TOC Cum.Gas(bcf) QFM

Crossplot Lower density & Higher GR = More organic RhoB max gray shale = 2.82 g/cc (g/cc)

Calculate TOC from RhoB Schmoker, 1993, USGS Bull 1909

Shading based on density (RhoB) <2.4 >2.8 More carbonaceous More clastic Cross Section WE 1,600 feet 72 miles

27.6 Billion Tons CO 2 Estimated 40 scf/ton thickness weighted average >3 MM <1 MM Tons/sq km

Future Map TOC from density logsMap TOC from density logs New estimate of CO 2 capacityNew estimate of CO 2 capacity Demonstration projectDemonstration project –CO 2 monitoring Surface soils Produced gas –Reservoir simulation

Conclusion Preliminary analyses indicate the organic-rich Mississippian– Devonian shales of Kentucky have the potential to sequester large volumes of CO 2.