Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Other Historic Preservation Statutes: Archaeology
Advertisements

NAGPRA: introductions
Kennewick Man: Science vs. Sacred Rights ( Why Should we Care?) A recent flood washed your grandmother's casket into a riverbed. Since her remains have.
Tribal Shares & Residuals Panel 5. Definitions Tribal share means that portion of resources currently used by IHS to carryout the PSFAs to be contracted/compacted.
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
Local Government Environmental Training: Archaeology April 2, 2009.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
Archaeological Resources Protection Act Steve Perry Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement Region 7
Heritage Resources Management and the Wildland Fire Suppression Undertaking.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Archaeological Ethics Two big issues we haven’t covered in this concept course: The Status of Archaeological Practice today, and this includes Culture.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
Real Property Training
The Fly in the Ointment: Consultation Under Section 106 and Other Laws Related to Historic Preservation Peacekeeper Conference, 1985.
Cultural Resource Management Plans What good are they?
Teaching about contemporary indigenous people: Problematic politics of representation in museum education programming.
NAGPRA GRANT COMMUNITY MEETING: SECTION 6 SUMMARIES UPDATE BY LEE RAINS CLAUSS SHERWOOD VALLEY BAND OF POMO FEBRUARY 7, 2015 This meeting is supported.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
NEW ECHOTA New Echota is one of the most significant Cherokee Indian sites in the nation.
Chapter 17 Caring for America’s Cultural Heritage.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
NATIONAL NAGPRA What is The National NAGPRA Program?
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act The Law and Ethics of the Kennewick Man Controversy Presented by: Graham Sowa.
CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
NEW MEXICO CRIME DATA PROJECT Prepared and Presented by Ada Pecos Melton, MPA American Indian Development Associates th St., NW, Suite 212 Albuquerque,
Cultural Resource Management Preservation and Conservation.
NAGPRA: THE BASICS By Lee Rains Clauss 1 st NAGPRA Community Meeting Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Willits, CA March 1, This meeting is supported.
Losing Your Marbles and Other Cultural Objects Three Case Studies in Repatriation.
Cultural Resources Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 10/27/
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
NAGPRA GRANT COMMUNITY MEETING SHERWOOD VALLEY RANCHERIA OF POMO MARCH 1, 2014 This meeting is supported by a grant from the Department of the Interior,
By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL.
Who Owns the Dead? Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act Luis Salas.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Paul Lumley Senior Tribal Liaison, ODUSD (I&E)
Politics and Native American History Reconstructing the Past.
NATIONAL NAGPRA What is The National NAGPRA program?
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Caring for America’s Cultural Heritage. This chapter will enable you to answer these questions : 1. What federal policies help protect cultural resources,
Anth January 2012.
Dorothy Alther, Executive Director California Indian Legal Services
Effective Meetings Planning is the Key:
Deepwater Horizon (MC 252) Oil Spill: Section 106 Compliance
International Repatriation Update
Introduction to Tribal Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights
Working with and benefitting from NAGPRA
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS
North American Native Experience
International Historic Preservation Law
Bureau of Indian Education School Board Training
Pedestrian Survey.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Midterm Review Public Archaeology.
by Thomas King Exploring Cultural Concepts
Decolonizing Museums and Anthropology
Overview of 2019 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
Ethics, Laws and Sacred Objects
Kennewick Man: Science vs. Sacred Rights (Why Should we Care?)
American Indian Rights and Claims Course Sequence Flowchart
National Historic Preservation Act
The Indian Removal Act of 1830
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Overview of 2020 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Clifford T. Brown

NAGPRA Human rights/civil rights legislation Main regs: 43 CFR 10 Passed in part as a reaction to ARPA Smithsonian governed by separate but similar law Main regs: 43 CFR 10 Can be divided into two parts: A retrospective portion that applied to collections in hand on the date the law was passed (November 16, 1990) A prospective portion that applies to collections acquired or projects undertaken after the law was passed Applies to federal agencies and museums receiving federal funds Applies to Federally recognized tribes, Native Alaskans, and Native Hawaiians Definitions: Human remains (but not if naturally shed) Associated funerary objects Unassociated funerary objects Sacred objects Objects of cultural patrimony

Retrospective portion Requires summaries and inventories of cultural items in existing collections by specified deadlines Summaries of unassociated funerary objects, sacred items and objects of cultural patrimony By 3 years after the law was passed (I.e., by 1993) Inventories of human remains and associated funerary objects By 5 years after the law was passed (I.e., by 1995) Ironically, regulations only issued in 1995

Summaries and inventories Should be developed in consultation with potential claimants and interested parties Else, how do you know what is, say, sacred? Have to be provided to interested parties (Indian tribes) under specified circumstances Have to be sent to National NAGPRA program office Potential claimants file claims for repatriation with Federal agency or other institution Law specifies order of priority for repatriation Lineal descendants first Tribe that owns the land next Culturally affiliated tribes later

Prospective portion Federal agencies have to consult with tribes before excavating NAGPRA cultural items. Properly, this means consulting in advance of any action that might produce NAGPRA items Can create comprehensive agreements with tribes to minimize disruption to routine business Excavated cultural items get repatriated to tribe(s) Trafficking in human remains is illegal