Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A AI Planning at airports:Departure Management PLANET Industry Day.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Block 1 Overview Rubén Oscar González Air Navigation Commissioner
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
1 Air-Ground Integration Ed Bailey, Airborne Project Leader & Ian Wilson, PATs Project Leader.
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
1 PHARE Demonstrations Overview of Results Marc Bisiaux PD/3 Project Leader Eurocontrol Experimental Centre.
Total Airport Management CARE Innovative Study
1 NAS Performance and Analysis: The Role of the Airspace Laboratory Airspace Laboratory May 2002 Toulouse, France.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A Slot Swapping Applications for CDM P.R. de Waal, NLR M.H. van den.
1 NEXTOR Monitoring and Modeling NAS Performance at the Daily Level Mark Hansen Performance Metrics TIM May 2002.
1 Performance indicators, targets, steering Technical Interchange meeting Toulouse, May 2002 Xavier FRON Head Performance Review Unit.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice 1.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
1 Chapter 10 Multicriteria Decision-Marking Models.
ABC Technology Project
Airside Capacity Enhancement
© DLR, Institute of Flight Guidance ASAS Thematic Network 2 nd Workshop 6-8 October 2003 – Malmö Session 1 – ATSA Application Track Bernhard Czerlitzki.
Air Traffic Management
- European CDM - Collaborative Departures Sequencing Optimising departure sequence according to the priorities of Airline and Airport as well as Tower.
IP Multicast Information management 2 Groep T Leuven – Information department 2/14 Agenda •Why IP Multicast ? •Multicast fundamentals •Intradomain.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Transition Towards Free Flight: A Human Factors Evaluation of.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Designing for Safety: the Free Flight ATM concept Jacco Hoekstra.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Overview of NLR Free Flight project ‘97 - ‘99 Jacco Hoekstra
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Page 1 The ONESKY (Single-Sky) project and what it means for ASAS.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR AI Planning, Waiting for the Results? H.H. Hesselink R.R.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Free Flight Deck Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) S-7, “Flight.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A “Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A “Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Adding Up In Chunks.
Welcome To The Three Umpire System. © 2007 Softball Canada All Rights Reserved Softball Canada Three Umpire System FP 2 Tips for the Three Umpire System.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport.
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Week 1.
Prof.ir. Klaas H.J. Robers, 14 July Graduation: a process organised by YOU.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
PSSA Preparation.
1 Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'…. ICAO EANPG FUA Task Force Paris, May 2008 EUROCONTROL Airspace, Network Planning & Navigation Division.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
Presentation transcript:

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A AI Planning at airports:Departure Management PLANET Industry Day Charles University Prague 26 May 2003 H.H. (Henk) Hesselink Group leader AI and Airport Decision Support Systems

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-2A Today l Introduction NLR l Planning at airports l Departure management - how can AI planning help? l Departure sequencing - details l Results so far and future

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-3A National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR) l NLR is a non-profit foundation since 1937/1919 l NLR provides technical and scientific contributions to activities in aerospace related areas l NLR will independently serve public and private organisations

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-4A Division of Activities into Categories Supported l Civil aerospace: 65%- Military aerospace: 35% l Aeronautics: 85%- Space: 15% l Operations: 60%- Development: 40% l (non-aerospace: < 2%) l Turn over: 150 million hfl.

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-5A Facilities l Large Wind Tunnels (2 low speed, 2 transonic, 1 supersonic, 50% shared in DNW) l Simulators (flight, air traffic control, tower) l Aircraft (Fairchild Metro II, Cessna Citation II) l environments (supercomputer, network, middleware)

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-6A Planning at airports Why do we need planning and what is the most promising step at this moment: departure management

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-7A Planning, the basis l Planning has been the subject of many projects (a.o. military) l Planning in en-route (during flight) is examined –Free routing / autonomous pilot is a concept where the pilot flies his route without intervening with air traffic control - this cannot work without planning l Planning for arrival traffic (still flying) is being implemented at several airports now –Arrival management => Planning at airports is a next step

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-8A ATM Planning: the Problem

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-9A Each airport is different but the same

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-10A Planning decisions to be taken... Apron start upTaxiway crossing Runway holding Intersection take-off Deicing area Left or right track

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-11A Current airport planners l Airport planner 1: pre-flight controller l Responsible for giving clearances and information before the aircraft actually starts moving l Gives SID (= departure route) l Co-ordinates with CFMU (European co-ordinated slot time, central agency in Brussels) l Main problem: communication overload

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-12A Current airport planners l Airport planner - 2: ground controller l Responsible for movements over the taxiways of the airport l Gives taxiing routes l Merges inbound and outbound traffic l Establishes departure sequences l Assesses runway and/or apron congestion to avoid taxiway congestion (use of holdings and parkings)

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-13A Current airport planners l Airport planner - 3: tower controller l Responsible for traffic at runways l Usually one runway per tower controller l Segregated mode vs. mixed mode operations l Large aircraft separation necessary because of wake vortex and speed differences

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-14A Current airport planners l Airport planner - 4: approach controller l Responsible for the airspace around the airport l Sequences arrival traffic l Uses STARs (Standard Arrival Routes) and stacks l Takes care of dependencies between runways (e.g. crossing runways or converging runways), always aware of overshoots or missed approaches l Determines the runway capacity

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-15A Current airport planners l Airport planner - 5: supervisor l Responsible for the flow of traffic l Decides on runway usage l Assesses meteo and decides on airport acceptance rate (per hour) - information will be send to Brussels (CFMU) l Co-ordinates work of other controllers, assesses their workload and decides on division of work over 1 to 10 controllers

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-16A Departure Management How can AI Planning Help?

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-17A Departure sequencing: model

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-18A Departure Sequencing Problem l Sequencing aircraft at the available runways l Computer assistance to the controller team in the control tower l Co-operate with other planners l Planning will be performed before the aircraft starts moving ( minutes in advance). Tool provides sequences on an optimal basis, in stead of (smart) first-come-first-served

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-19A What variables must be planned? runway SID structure 2 min. 5 min. exit holding A * runway assignment runway holdingA 2 min. 5 min. exit * intersection take-off * time (sequences) * SID allocation

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-20A NLR departure sequencer The details of constraint reasoning

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-21A What is planning l Planning is the preparation of actions (movements) in the broadest sense of the word –setting a goal –determining actions to achieve this goal –sequencing these actions l It takes into account the current situation, available resources, changing information, … l Many constraints

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-22A Constraints l Some constraints are hard (CFMU, wake vortex,..) l Some constraints are soft (distribution, pilot wishes,..) l Constraints differ per airport l Constraints differ per situation => We need an implementation that follows all rules (regulations) but still provides some flexibility => AI Planning: constraint satisfaction with optimisation

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-23A Constraint Satisfaction S E N D M O R E + M O N E Y S = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] E = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] N = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] D = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] M = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] O = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] R = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] Y = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] C 1 C 2 C 3 C4C4 C = [0, 1] _ _________________ -- C 2 + S + M > 10 etc...

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-24A Departure seq.: constraint satisfaction l Departure slots can be represented as F1 runway = [16L, 16R, 34L, 34R, 07, 25] F1 time = [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] F1 SID = [ELBA5A, ELBA5B, ELBA5C] F2 runway = [16L, 16R, 34L, 34R, 07, 25] F2 time = [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] F2 SID = [ELBA5A, ELBA5B, ELBA5C] l Constraints: e.g. 3 min. separation between heavy - light: For F1 <> F2 and Runway (F1 = F2) and (Time(F1) Weight(F2)) Conclude Time(F1) + 3 <= Time (F2)

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-25A Departure Sequencing Problem l Runway assignment –Environmental constraints –Meteo conditions –Different runway entry points (CAVOK) l Separation –Wake vortex –Speed l Distribution –Initial climb routes/SIDs –TMA exit point acceptance rate

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-26A Departure Sequencing Problem l Time –Achieve CFMU time constraints (flow restrictions) –Give preference to late aircraft l Optimisation –Minimise runway throughput –Make efficient use of available airspace –Depart as early as possible –Provide flexibility l Controller/pilot –Controller makes decisions, machine supports –Pilot may have preferences

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-27A Departure sequencing: HMIs

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-28A Trial implementation at Prague airport (Integrated in the NOVA system)

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-29A Results so far and future work Where do we stand and what do we expect from the future

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-30A Departure sequencing: concept Departure sequence Intersection take-off Taxiway routing Co-ordination Apron management Co-ordination Start-up Push back De-icing Runway allocation Wake vortex Speed Flow restrictions CFMU slots SID usage

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-31A Controller support in planning l With the provision of a departure management function, we will be able to: l Enable a better knowledge of the current and future situation (situation awareness) l Provide continuous optimal capacity l Provide the controller a new challenging operational task –make strategic decisions on departure management –provide advanced guidance –increase safety with new complex procedural demands

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-32A Results so far l Implementation in C ++, connected to CORBA in A-SMGCS simulator; core scheduler build in ILOG l Off-line DMAN evaluations at Rome-Fiumicino and Paris- Orly ( ) l On-line DMAN tests at Prague and Hamburg ( ) l Simulator trials for Frankfurt (2002) (Tower simulator) l Current activities: –Connection to pilot (CDM) –New trials with controllers in the simulator

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-33A Results so far l In a new set up, we are investigating planning & negotiation algorithms: intelligent agents l Several contributions to Advanced Airport Technology course at the Institute of Air Navigation Services (Eurocontrol Luxembourg) –Departure management course –NLR Demonstration is running at IANS l Several papers have been published

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-34A Planning and co-ordination

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-35A Some results from operational trials l Prague evaluations (27 May - 7 June 2002) Hamburg evaluations ( September 2002) l DMAN resulted in a smoother traffic flow for runway occupancy (results are obtained from simulator trials) DMAN No DMAN

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-36A Future of airport planning l Planning is a novel concept to be supported l Forces controllers to evaluate start-up and push-back requests and gives additional information (situational awareness) l First efficiency benefit have been proven. New demands will arise for e.g. environmental monitoring, in which planning can provide great help l Changing operational procedures is not always appreciated; we slightly started to explore the possibility l Controller wants to be in command

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-37A The result: