The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.
Advertisements

Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Scoping Meetings July 7 and 8, 2010.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
The Right Things to Know about Right- of-Way April 8, 2016 Tammy M. Keeley Realty Officer FHWA – AL Divisi on.
Nick Hines, CEP Natural Resource Supervisor WYDOT Local Public Agency guide to getting through NEPA.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Interagency Coordination in Long Range Transportation Planning
Programmatic Agreements
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Construction Oversight
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
ACA Conference - September 2017
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
HUD SMAC Conference November 7, 2017
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
2013 Preconstruction Managers Meeting
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Local Public Agency Guide to Getting Through NEPA The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Nick Hines, CEP NEPA Management and Project Delivery Supervisor

Overview of NEPA 1969 NEPA Enacted by Congress First Major Environmental Law Evaluate Environmental Effects Two Major Purposes Congress enacted the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in December of 1969 First Major Environmental Law in the United States Requires Federal Agencies to evaluate the environmental effects of their proposed actions PRIOR to making final decisions. Two Major Purposes of NEPA Assist in making informed decisions Increase citizen involvement in decision making Make Informed Decisions Increase Citizen Involvement

WYDOT Environmental Services webpage More Information on NEPA WYDOT Environmental Services webpage http://www.dot.state.wy.us/home/engineering_technical_programs/environmental_services.html FHWA Environmental Review Toolkit https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/ Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR 771) https://www.ecfr.gov

How NEPA Affects Local Agencies NEPA is required on all projects that have a Federal Action. Federal Actions can include Federal Money - Any federal money used on the project, including pass through funding like the Transportation Alternative Program and High Risk Rural Roads. Federal Permit - Section 404 permits (Waters of the U.S.), federal land special use permits, take permits for endangered species, etc Federal Land - Use of federal land, crossing federal land, federal land use changes, etc. The Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) is the lead agency on most WYDOT projects, including pass through funding projects

FHWA / WYDOT Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) Agreement CE1-Batched CE2-WYDOT Approved CE3-FHWA Approved FHWA and WYDOT have developed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for Approval of Categorical Exclusions (CEs) for transportation projects, which outlines the procedures for the processing of CEs for federal-aid actions. The MOA sets impact thresholds and depending on the impact depends on which of the following type of CE WYDOT must follow. MOA covers three types of Ces – CE1 (Batched), CE2 – WYDOT Approved, CE3 – FHWA approved.

FHWA / WYDOT PCE Agreement and LPA Projects LPA projects should have minimal environmental impacts and therefore qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. Categorical Exclusions are projects that have no significant environmental impacts, based on context and intensity. Due to the Federal DOT money that is paying for the grants. FHWA is the lead federal agency on the LPA projects with WYDOT providing NEPA oversight. This allows the LPA projects to fall under the MOA for Categorical Exclusions between FHWA and WYDOT. In order to simplfy the NEPA process WYDOT and FHWA have agreeded to a modified CE template for locat agencies. This LPA CE Template allows the locals to comply with federal regualtions and is a modified versions of a WYDOT CE. This allows local agencies to complete the CE and be in control of their own project. WYDOT is available to help answer questions, review the document and approve the document in most cases. FHWA provides WYDOT oversight and approval, if needed.

Before You Begin the Categorical Exclusions (CE) http://www.dot.state.wy.us/home/engineering_technical_programs/environmental_services/LPA.html Make sure you are using the most current form. Can get it from the WYDOT Environmental Servifces LPA page at the link above. DO NOT modify the CE form and do not send in any other format. DO NOT send the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) a scoping letter. Contact WYDOT Environmental Services a to determine the level of Cultural Investigation needed for your project.

Agency Scoping Letters U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Wyoming Game and Fish WYDOT Environmental Services Must Send scoping letters to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Wyoming Game and Fish (WGFD) WYDOT Environmental Services - for cultural determination WYDOT will make a determination of impacts and consult with SHPO for you. Expect a couple weeks for WYDOT to make a determination or inform you a investigation is needed. Expect a minimum of 30 days to get a response from SHPO.

Optional Agency Scoping Letters Local Floodplain Coordinator U.S. Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service Natural Resources Conservation Svc. Tribal Coordination Additional agencies you may have to scope depending on project location/type. Local landowners

(the LGS Office has example letters) What to include in Scoping Letters Project City, State and County Description of Work Location of Work Maps or Plans Showing Location and Proposed Improvements (the LGS Office has example letters) The intent of the scoping letter is to get information and/or concerns from the agencies that oversee resources. These agencies typically have no idea about your project. So you need to include enough information so they can find your project in their systems. At a minimum you need to include the project location - Project City, State, County – for example Casper, Natrona County, Wyoming. A Description of the proposed work – Construct a 10’ separated concrete pathway. A location of the proposed work for example Between Main Street and Third on the east side of Lincoln Street. Maps or Plans showing location and proposed improvements are extrememly helpful and typically a requirement. Contact the LGC office has example scoping letters you can use.

Archeological and Historical Determinations of the Area of Potential Effect, level of cultural investigation and determinations of eligibility are all made by the lead federal agency per 36 CFR 800. FHWA is the lead federal agency and has designated WYDOT to make these determinations.   

Archeological and Historical WYDOT will review the project based on the information provided in the scoping letter and ask “Is there a potential to affect historical properties?” NO YES No Potential to Affect Historic properties WYDOT will send language to put in the CE and include both letters in the CE. Potential to Affect Historic properties WYDOT will respond that a consultant will be required to produce a report A consultant will be required to perform a Cultural or Historical survey and prepare a draft report.

WYDOT will make a determination and will consult with SHPO. Archeological and Historical WYDOT will review the project based on the information provided in the scoping letter and ask “Is there a potential to affect historical properties?” YES Consultant/LPA will SEND A DRAFT report of their findings to WYDOT for review and comment. WYDOT will make a determination and will consult with SHPO. Once the SHPO concurrence letter is received WYDOT will send language to put in the CE. Include letters in the CE.

Section 4(f) of the DOT Act Section 4(f) – of the 1966 DOT Act establishes the requirements for consideration of park and recreational lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges and historic sites in transportation project development. Projects involving work on, or even adjacent to, fairgrounds, public open spaces, public parks, state game lands, or other recreational facilities fully open to the public will require compliance with Section 4(f).

Public Participation Describe any opportunities that the public has had to provide comments on the project. Include any public meetings, council meetings or direct landowner contact. WYDOT’s current Public Involvement Handbook can be found on the WYDOT website. http://www.dot.state.wy.us/home/news_info/public_involvement.html

LPA Categorical Exclusion Template Project Location (The Where) - Describe the location of the project including roads, town/city, county and Section Township and Range. Include project location map as Figure 1 in the CE. Be detailed enough that anyone can find your project on Google Earth. Detailed maps showing where the work will be located is appreciated. Purpose and Need (The Why) - Most critical part of the NEPA process. Describe what issue or problem you are intending to resolve with this project and why does the issue/problem needs to be resolved. Do not state the solution or scope of work. The Purpose and Need is to improve pedestrian saety along Lincoln Street. Currently the Improve safety for pedestrians Building to meet Planning or Transportation Planning documents Increase in traffic has lead to unsafe pedestrian crossing DO NOT add a bunch of fluffy grant language here.