Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Created by Terri Street; inspired by the work of Jennifer Wagner; revisions courtesy of Stephanie Novack. © 2000, 2009 Background images courtesy of abc.com.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
THE EXTERNAL HAZARD.
School Shop. Welcome to my shop. You have 10p How much change will you get? 7p 3p change.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
I can count in decimal steps from 0.01 to
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
ZMQS ZMQS
Module IV - Dose terms and units
ENERGY STAR ® Qualified Fenestration Products ENERGY STAR Meeting – June 4, 2008 Steve Hopwood Office of Energy Efficiency.
ABC Technology Project
Town of Plattsburgh Street Light 2012 Proposal. Sold to Municipalities starting in 1950 Extra Energy was in the grid during off peak hours. NYSE&G began.
Portable Instruments & Area Monitors
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
A Strong Church. Introduction Our goal should be to help our congregation become a strong church. We better appreciate the need for a strong church when.
8.6 Linear Programming. Linear Program: a mathematical model representing restrictions on resources using linear inequalities combined with a function.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Fraction XI Adding Mixed Numbers With Unlike Denominators
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1 Atlantic Annual Viewing Trends Adults 35-54, Total TV, By Daypart Average Minute Audience (000) Average Weekly Reach (%) Average Weekly Hours Viewed.
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
$1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $1,000 $500 $300 $200 $100 Welcome.
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
Information for Workers Issued a Radiation Monitoring Badge
Presentation transcript:

Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED June 2011

2 UNCLASSIFIED Disclaimer The appearance of a manufacturers equipment does not imply endorsement of the equipment by the Army, DOD, or the Federal Government.

Individual Screened –General-Use: 0.25 μSv (25 μrem) per screening –Limited-Use: 0.01 mSv (1 mrem) per screening –0.25 mSv (25 mrem) per year Operators/Bystanders Annual Limit – 1 mSv (100 mrem) per year Inspection zone – operators and bystanders outside inspection zone during screening Introduction to Personnel Security Screening Systems 3 UNCLASSIFIED

Purpose: Evaluate potential dose to the individual being screened Field measurements – ANSI N methodology (Reference Effective Dose) Energy correction, Dose conversion factors – No estimate of eye or skin doses with survey instruments Dosimeter study requires – Very large number of screenings – Automated method for initiating screenings – Using DDE as a surrogate for Reference Effective Dose 4 UNCLASSIFIED Background

Test Setup – Repetitive Screening 5 UNCLASSIFIED System 1: –Robotic solution –93,105 screenings –~ 2 weeks System 2: –Software solution –8,627 screenings –< 1 week

Test Setup - Phantoms 6 UNCLASSIFIED

Maximum DDE per screening: – 4,200 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (4.5 μrem) Average DDE per screening: – 3,559 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (3.8 μrem) Minimum DDE per screening: – 2,560 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (2.7 μrem) 7 UNCLASSIFIED System 1: Deep Dose Equivalent Screenings to Reach 0.25 mSv (25 mrem) AnnualWeeklyDaily Max DDE5, Avg DDE6, Min DDE9,

Maximum LDE per screening: – 8,450 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (9.1 μrem) Average LDE per screening: – 6,226 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (6.7 μrem) Minimum LDE per screening: – 4,710 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (5.1 μrem) 8 UNCLASSIFIED System 1: Lens Dose Equivalent Screenings to Reach 15 mSv (1500 mrem) AnnualWeeklyDaily Max LDE165,2753, Avg LDE224,3294, Min LDE296,5135,702815

Maximum SDE per screening: – 15,050 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (16.2 μrem) Average SDE per screening: – 10,552 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (11.3 μrem) Minimum SDE per screening: – 7,420 μSv/93,105 screenings = μSv (8.0 μrem) 9 UNCLASSIFIED System 1: Shallow Dose Equivalent Screenings to Reach 50 mSv (5 rem) AnnualWeeklyDaily Max SDE309,3195, Avg SDE441,1638,4841,212 Min SDE627,39212,0651,724

System 2 10 UNCLASSIFIED

Maximum DDE per screening: – 540 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (6.3 μrem) Average DDE per screening: – 416 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (4.8 μrem) Minimum DDE per screening: – 250 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (2.9 μrem) 11 UNCLASSIFIED System 2: Deep Dose Equivalent Screenings to Reach 0.25 mSv (25 mrem) AnnualWeeklyDaily Max DDE3, Avg DDE5, Min DDE8,

Maximum LDE per screening: – 650 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (7.5 μrem) Average LDE per screening: – 516 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (6.0 μrem) Minimum LDE per screening: – 280 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (3.3 μrem) 12 UNCLASSIFIED System 2: Lens Dose Equivalent Screenings to Reach 15 mSv (1500 mrem) AnnualWeeklyDaily Max LDE199,0853, Avg LDE250,7854, Min LDE462,1618,8881,270

Maximum SDE per screening: – 780 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (9.0 μrem) Average SDE per screening: – 577 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (6.7 μrem) Minimum SDE per screening: – 280 μSv/8,627 screenings = μSv (3.3 μrem) 13 UNCLASSIFIED System 2: Shallow Dose Equivalent Screenings to Reach 50 mSv (5 rem) AnnualWeeklyDaily Max SDE553,01310,6351,519 Avg SDE747,57414,3762,054 Min SDE1,540,53629,6264,232

Both systems evaluated comply with the ANSI/HPS N dose per screening limit for general-use DDE is comparable to the Reference Effective Dose (ANSI/HPS N ) The annual number of screenings per individual is limited by the DDE/Reference Effective Dose, not LDE or SDE. 14 UNCLASSIFIED Summary Dose per Screening ( μ Sv ( μ rem)) Avg DDERef Eff Dose System (3.8)0.033 (3.3) System (4.8)0.046 (4.6)