The Legacy of the Marshall Court

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?

Advertisements

The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.

John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.

Who was John Marshall?  The Democratic-Republican victory in the 1800 election began a long run of Republican political success.  In spite of Federalists'

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

Marbury v. Madison (Appointed fed. Judge by Pres. Adams night before Adams left office) (Sec. of State for Jefferson) (1803) Background –“Midnight Judge”

Court Cases that Changed America

The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.

In a series of Marshall Court decisions from , A) state charters were not recognized as legal contracts B) a strong federal government was promoted.

John Marshall, Chief Justice

SUPREME Court’s Decisions

SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.

Federalism and the Supreme Court McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 2- minute summary Summary This landmark case declared that the United States government had implied powers as well as those.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

7.2 Nationalism at Center Stage Mr. Manelski CPUSH.

JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.

The Marshall Court Chapter 8. John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Marshall was the most important chief justice in U.S. history ( ) Significantly.

Supreme court cases: constitution is the supreme law of the land Analyze court cases that illustrate that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the.

John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 

Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.

Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.

Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)

Era of Good Feelings The “American System” The Monroe Doctrine The Marshall Court The Election of 1824 a “Corrupt Bargain”

Confederation to Constitution 1776: 2 nd Continental Congress declares independence; PA creates democratic state constitution 1781 : Articles of Confederation.

Chief Justice John Marshall

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.

The Era of Good Feelings  Marked by spirit of nationalism, optimism, & goodwill  Republicans dominated politics  “Good feelings” actually a misnomer.

Supreme Court Cases The John Marshall Court strengthened the federal government by supporting.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)

Chapter 10 A Changing Nation.

The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.

Supreme Court Cases. In your group, you will.. Read your court case individually Examine the case as a group Present your findings to the class.

Born in Virginia, 1755 Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing.

Supreme Court of the United States  SCOTUS Branch of gov’t which interprets/applies the law Makes sure laws/gov’t action are constitutional  Judicial.

UNITED STATES HISTORY AND THE CONSTITUTION

Supreme Court USHC-1.7.

Implied Powers of the National Government

Anti-federalists vs Federalists

Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

Supreme Court USHC-1.7.

American Nationalism Forces of Unification.

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.

The Federalist Judiciary

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch

John Marshall's supreme court

Chapter 10 A Changing Nation.

The Marshall Court.

Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard.

The Marshall Court 6.3.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions

The Marshall Court- A Stronger National Govt.

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

Growth of the Supreme Court

Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?

Defining the Powers of the National Government

Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?

Topic: Evaluating the Decisions of the Marshall Court

Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic

5-4: Nationalism 1820s-1850s.

JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755

JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755

A Changing Nation.

Do Now (Background Essay)

Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?

The Marshall Court.

Presentation transcript:

The Legacy of the Marshall Court 1801-1835 Subtitle

I. Major Goals of Marshall, who was appointed by Pres. Adams in 1801 Increase the powers of the national government B. Diminish the powers of the states C. Perpetuate the Federalist principle of centralization. D. Property rights of individuals need to be protected from government interference

II. Strengthening the National Government A. Cases expanding the authority of the Supreme Court 1. Marbury v. Madison (1803) gave the Court the power of judicial review. First overturning of a law (Judiciary Act of 1789). 2. U.S. v. Peters (1809) established the Court's right to coerce a state legislature 3. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) confirmed the Court's right to overrule a state court 4. Cohens v. Virginia (1821). States were no longer sovereign in all respects since they had ratified the Constitution. State courts must submit to federal jurisdiction.

II. Strengthening the National Government Continued B. Cases expanding the powers of Congress 1. McCullough v. Maryland (1819) upheld the right of Congress to charter a national bank and be free from taxation by a state, thus putting into national law the doctrine of implied powers. Maryland's lawyers argued that Congress did not have the right to charter a national bank. "The power to tax involves the power to destroy," responded Marshall, upholding the bank's right to exist and be free from taxes. 2. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) gave the national government undisputed control over interstate commerce by ruling invalid a steamboat monopoly chartered by New York state. This freed internal transportation from state restraint

III. Weakening the States A. Fletcher v. Peck (1810) established the principle that state laws were invalid when in conflict with the Constitution and that contracts must be upheld. A land grant given by the Georgia legislature to speculators was revoked by a later legislature. Marshall ruled for the speculators, giving federal protection to purchasers of state-owned lands. B. Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) -- By forbidding the state legislature to alter the college charter, Marshall established the principle that charters were contracts which could not be impaired. C. Martin v. Mott (1827) denied a state the right to withhold its militia from service.

IV. Legacy of Marshall A. Established the primacy of federal government over states in exercising control of economy B. Opened the way for an increased federal role in promoting economic growth C. Affirmed protection for corporations and other private economic institutions from local governmental interference. This allowed for the growth of the new industrial capitalist economy.