WENDWG – WENSWG Progress Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IHB Report on IRCC-2HSSC-2. IRCC-2 Establish, coordinate and enhance cooperation in hydrographic activities amongst States on a regional basis, and between.
Advertisements

IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE IRCC-6 Agenda item 10 Input from HSSC-5 IHB.
SEVENTH MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IRCC7) WEND WG REPORT.
SEVENTH MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IRCC7) ANNUAL REPORT 2014.
MACHC16, December 2015 Hydrographic Service Leendert Dorst Structured MACHC reporting to IRCC and IHB over 2015.
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee 7th MEETING OF THE IHO HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICES AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE (HSSC) Busan, Republic of Korea,
MACHC WENDWG 5 4 rd Meeting held March 3-5, 2015 Overlay Services (AIO) Update report on the study for overlapping ENCs Review of the WEND Principles.
Inter Regional Coordination Committee Revision of the IHO Strategic Plan and Input to the Long-term Work Programme /22 IRCC8-11.
WWNWS Report to the IRCC Abu Dahbi, May, Membership and Meeting Members: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Greece, India, Japan,
IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE IRCC-8 Agenda item 8 Input from HSSC-7 IHB.
Worldwide ENC Database Working Group
By Jens Peter Hartmann (MSDIWG Chair)
9TH MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
9th MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Standards” and by the Council key Priorities
Proposed IHO Work Programme for 2018
Report on IRCC9 Key Issues Relating to EAHC
Proposal to IRCC 10 to extend the tasks of MSDI WG
WORLDWIDE ENC DATABASE WORKING GROUP (WENDWG)
10th MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Outcomes from the IRCC-9
IRCC work is guided by the IHO Work Programme 3
REPORT AND PROPOSALS FROM IRCC Reference Doc: C2-4.2A
Development and future provision of S-100 based Products
Report of the Strategic Plan Review Working Group Bruno Frachon
8TH MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Overlapping ENC data: IC-ENC Policy and progress IC-ENC Chairman – Capt Marc Van Der Donck IRCC9, June 2017.
Council-2 Readout MACHC19 November 29, 2018
Add Commission and date Sept 17, 2018
IRCC 10 Outcomes Complete IRCC report available on the IHO website
Draft procedure for ENC overlaps (IRCC6-08b)
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THOSE ITEMS FROM THE 2nd MEETING OF THE IHO COUNCIL
Worldwide ENC Database Working Group (WENDWG) Report
Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission
EAtHC Seminar Lagos, Nigeria, October 2018 Capacity Building
Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission 8th Conference
NCWG Input to the IHO Strategic Plan and IHO 3 Year Work Plan
MesoAmerican and Caribbean Sea Hydrographic Commission
WEND Update.
SWPHC – 27 February 2015 Rarotonga, Cook Islands ---
Report from the 7th Meeting of the IHO Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee (HSSC7) to NCWG April 2016, IHB, Monaco.
Council-2 Readout SWPHC February 13, 2019
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
DQWG14-10J Data integrity, marine boundaries from a MSDI perspective Submitted by the MSDIWG Chair Monaco, 6 February 2019.
Worldwide ENC Database Working Group (WENDWG) SWPHC16 Update
Operation of the Organization under IHO Convention and its supporting Basic Documents
IHO Secretariat, Monaco, November
OGC Marine DWG Update for MSDIWG (Vancouver 2017)
IRCC work is guided by the IHO Work Programme 3
IRCC-7 Agenda item 10 Input from HSSC-6 IHB
What is Capacity Building?
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Status Report of the SPRWG of the Council Future Strategic Plan
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Status Report of the SPRWG of the Council
NORDIC HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION (NHC)
Council-2 Readout IRCC June 3, 2019
IRCC-10 Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)
Southern African & Islands Hydrographic Commission (SAIHC) Report
Provision of Data Beyond Charts WEND’s S-100 Future Challenges
Dr. Mathias JONAS, Secretary-General (IHO Secretariat)
Status Report of the SPRWG of the Council
11th MEETING OF THE IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Dr. Mathias JONAS, Secretary-General (IHO Secretariat)
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Report and Proposal from IRCC
Aim of presentation CBSC was tasked to propose to the Council via IRCC to provide information on the minimum resources needed to support a sustainable.
Report and Proposal from IRCC
Presentation transcript:

WENDWG – WENSWG Progress Report IHO INTER-REGIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE IRCC-10 Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019) WENDWG – WENSWG Progress Report IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

Proposed WENS Principles - Background In support of the Council actions C2/30 and C2/31, a draft update to the WEND Principles was prepared. WENS principles intend to shift focus from ENC to comprehensive (S-100) suite of services. The WENDWG formed a drafting group to collect comments and submit a progress report to IRCC 11 C2/30 - IRCC to instruct and provide guidance to the WENDWG in order to investigate the applicability of the WEND-like Principles to the production and dissemination of S-101 ENCs and the first generation of S-100 based products and to report back at C-3 C2/31 - Council, HSSC, IRCC Chairs and SecGen to draft an implementation strategy/roadmap for a transition plan aiming to the regular and harmonized production and dissemination of S-100 based products for further discussion at A-2 and for the preparation of the 2021-2023 IHO Work Programme IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

Proposed WENS Principles - Background WENS still encourages data availability anywhere in the world, distribution through compatible and coordinated networks, standardization, authority of service, and data protection. It also addresses the avoidance of service duplication, coordinated data management, quality management, and assistance and training. The scope should be applicable to ENCs (S-57 and S-101) and to other services needed for safe, legal, and efficient marine operations by all classes of vessels. While not explicit in the document, of the standards now under development, it would include those intended for front of bridge use, and being addressed in the interoperability standards (S-101, S-102, S-104, S-111, S-122 (MPAs), S-124 (navigation warnings), and S-412 (weather warnings). The proposal envisions wordwide coordinated services, so that duplication of services (which could be inconsistent, inefficient, or confusing) is avoided. The proposal envisions a worldwide integrated dissemination system, so that users can become aware of, and gain access to compatible services worldwide. The proposal considers navigation use of these services, most of which are also expected to have some manifestation in national or regional MSDI efforts. The proposal is silent on the provision of this information in the MSDI context, though the same dissemination systems used for maritime navigation use may readily be extended for non-navigation use. MSDI also has standardization, coordination, and data access considerations, and scope beyond these specific services. There is a mention of capacity building, which is intended to establish that CB efforts are needed to support these additional services. It is recognized that this proposal expands the scope of navigation services to include some oceanographic and meteorological services that are critical for safe navigation. Given the opportunity for these services to distributed together, there is an opportunity to consider them together here. If the IHO takes on this wider coordination role, it will necessarily also expand our circles of collaboration to those agencies expert in these services. IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019) Analysis Comments received from six member state, five of which volunteered to be members of the drafting group. Comments were generally positive with some notes of caution regarding scope and timing. IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019) Comments Implementation cannot be separated from having final approval of the IHO Strategy at Assembly 2 and should reference the S-100 Strategic Implementation Plan WENS should focus on the S-100 services that support “Blue Growth” and highlight “Maritime Knowledge” that is both hydrographic and non-hydrographic Further analysis is required, with recommendation that the unsuccessful aspects of WEND be considered – remaining gaps in ENC coverage, overlapping data, information overlays, etc. IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019) Comments RENCs have been successful with ENC distribution so should be well suited to assist with WENS implementation Need to prioritize the future potential of the WENS workload but leave the prioritization of the WENS work to its work plan rather than its principles. IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019) Comments Considerable concern with coordinating services Service Providers may be confused with VARs Overlaps with ENCs have not been resolved, other services may be more difficult Some S-100 based services may sit outside the RHC domain, for example weather The IMO e-navigation Strategy provides a policy umbrella for WENS - which services will fit under WENS? MSP 5 - Maritime Safety Information MSP 11 - Nautical Chart Service MSP 12 - Nautical Publications S-100 services that are in this scope for WENS are S-101, S-102, S104, S-111, S-121, S121, S122, S-123, S125, (S-126), S-127, S-128 and S129. IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019) Conclusions Though there is strong support for the WENDWG to evolve into the WENSWG, there is still work to be done on the WENS Principles. It is very important to consider the work of the RENCs during the drafting process and to learn from the previous successes and failures of the WEND Principles. There may need to be some consideration regarding the governance of the WENS- development. WENS may not be considered to be purely an RHC issue but one that is more pertinent to individual member states. If that is the case, which body should lead its implementation, the IRCC or the Council? IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

Considerations - not in paper In forming a WENSWG, will we hamper progress (and limit competition) from the private sector? What is the appropriate role for the private sector? Is the WENDWG the proper place to build the WENS? Cons Is the current membership best suited to consider WENS? The WEND still has challenges to overcome. Pros Takes advantage of lessons learned by WENDWG Takes advantage of existing structure IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)

IRCC Actions Requested note this paper approve the general direction of the proposed transition from WEND to WENS provide preferences regarding the scope and direction of the WENS Principles consider which body should direct WENS progress, IRCC or Council instruct the drafting group how to proceed with regard to the pending IHO Strategy and the S-100 Strategic Implementation Plan IRCC-11, Genova, Italy (3-5 June 2019)