DISTRIBUTED GENERATION in Massachusetts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
How Technology will make Renewable Energy Competitive 10/17/2013
Duke Energy Ohio Standby Rates Jim Ziolkowski, P.E., Rates Manager September 13,
Logistic Management Warehousing
1 11 Public Service Commission Update on Utility Issues: Reliability and Infrastructure Upgrades, Advanced Metering Issues, and Related Matters Briefing.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
1 Department Policy on Hedging Paul G. Afonso, Chairman Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications & Energy March 31, 2004.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Colorado Renewable Requirements, Policies, and Projects James Tarpey, Esq. Commissioner Colorado Public Utilities Commission 1560 Broadway, Suite 250 Denver,
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Leveraging the Skills of Load Research to Add to the Bottom Line AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, SC July 10-13, 2005.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
Reasons for Pursuing DG in Ontario Presented by: Mark Wolnik Markham Energy Corp -Director March 5, 2003.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
Promoting Distributed Generation Resources Through State Initiatives Ed Ethridge Public Utility Commission of Texas Distributed Resources in Restructured.
1 ISU: DER in Illinois / Springfield, IL / May 18, 2000 Jairam Gopal California Energy Commission Sacramento CA Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies.
2004/06/0 2 Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Small Facilities - Technical Requirements Rhonda Wright.
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
Renewable Energy Innovation In Canberra Jon Sibley Director, Energy and Waste Policy Environment and Planning Directorate.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
Bypass Distributed Generation (DG) Forecast Methodology
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
SEIA Perspective on Marginal/Avoided CAISO Transmission Costs
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
TILOS: From energy sustainability on a small Greek island to a global disruption in the power sector Zisimos Mantas Business Development Officer, EUNICE.
NWA Suitability Criteria
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
Phase 3 Solar Feasibility Study Findings and Recommendations
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Evolving Economic Dispatch in SPP
The Future of Demand Response in New England
31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference
The LREC/ZREC PROGRAM and RFP Results
Scenario Scoping Process
Rates & Regulatory Updates
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
New England Resource Adequacy
GIE Annual Conference Bratislava, September 2006
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Utility Owned Generation? (UOG)
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
Michael Bailey, P.E. SDS Meeting, June 25-26, 2018
Byron Woertz, Manager—System Adequacy Planning
Alternative ICAP Proposal
Scenario Scoping Process
Grid Modernization in New Hampshire
Byron Woertz, Manager—System Adequacy Planning
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Mountain West Transmission Group Panel Discussion
NYS Department of Public Service
Tom Clark Vice President, Customer Service & Service Area Development
Wholesale Electricity Costs
MA DG Collaborative – Year 1
Commissioner Anne C. George
California’s Clean Energy Future
Natural Gas Outlook 2017 Docket No. UM 1286 Overview.
DC National Grid Modernization Trends NC DEQ Clean Energy Plan Workshop #3 April 22, 2019 Autumn Proudlove Senior Manager of Policy Research NC Clean.
10 Years Later: Rethinking the Role of Distribution Utilities
Presentation transcript:

DISTRIBUTED GENERATION in Massachusetts Deirdre K. Manning Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy November 19, 2004

PROMISE OF APPRECIABLE BENEFITS Local Power Quality Peak-Load Reduction Congestion Relief Reliability to Customer $$ Savings to Customer $$ Savings to Distribution Company Reduced Emissions

NOT WITHOUT MAJOR QUESTIONS Risk of Outage Gas Supply, Cost DG Customer Reaction to Gas Cost Control of DG Operation Shifting Load Patterns Statutory Exit Fees StandBy Rates Cross-Subsidization Locational or Average Rate Design Distribution Wheeling Utility’s Obligation to Provide Firm Service

RECENT DG ACTIVITY 2001 2002 2003 Total PV 26 10 47 83 GAS Small <100kw 2 6 Large >100kw 1 5

OVERVIEW OF RECENT DEPARTMENT ACTIONS

DTE 01-54 June 29, 2001 Purpose: to minimize or eliminate barriers to competitive choice DG has the potential to be a viable competitive alternative for customers Lack of uniformity regarding interconnection standards and backup rates could inhibit DG installations

DTE 02-38 June 13, 2002 Purpose: Open DG Investigation Scope of Investigation: Interconnection standards Method for calculating standby rates Role of DG in distribution company resource planning

DTE 02-38-A October 3, 2002 Purpose: Initiate action: Department orders Distribution Companies to Collaborate Collaborative to propose uniform interconnection standards MTC’s offer to facilitate the Collaborative accepted by the Department

DTE 98-84 April 22, 2003 Purpose: Alternative to Long-Range Forecasts via Distribution Planning Mechanism Transparency in Planning via Annual Filing Key Information: Load Growth; Power Flows Distribution Upgrades: Within Next 5 Years Transmission Upgrades: Within Next 10 Years

DTE 02-38-B February 24, 2004 Purpose: Department approves Model Interconnection Standards developed by the DG Collaborative DG Collaborative extended for Two Years DG Collaborative to Track DG Installations DG Collaborative to Recommend Adjustments

DTE 03-121 July 23, 2004 NSTAR StandBy Tariffs Exemptions Granted To: Renewable OSG OSG of 250 kW or Less OSG that will be operational as of 12-31-04 (12-31-05 for OSG between 250 kW and 1000 kW that is 30 percent or less of DG customer’s load First Such Proceeding Since Restructuring Approved Via Settlement Effective Aug. 1, 2004 Contract Demand with Ratchet Negotiated Contract Demand, Appealable Non-Firm Service

FUTURE MATTERS StandBy Rate Filings from Other Companies Adjustments to Interconnection Standards via DG Collaborative Efforts Recommendations concerning “Role of DG in Distribution Company Planning” via DG Collaborative in their next Annual Report Efforts by Department to Obtain Information on StandBy Costs