Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Callum Smits, Peter E. Czabotar, Mark G. Hinds, Catherine L. Day 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e7 (January 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Scaffolding in the Spliceosome via Single α Helices
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Crystal Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis KasA Show Mode of Action within Cell Wall Biosynthesis and its Inhibition by Thiolactomycin  Sylvia R.
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Crystal Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis KasA Show Mode of Action within Cell Wall Biosynthesis and its Inhibition by Thiolactomycin  Sylvia R.
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Structure of the BRCT Repeats of BRCA1 Bound to a BACH1 Phosphopeptide
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Structural Basis of Proline-Proline Peptide Bond Specificity of the Metalloprotease Zmp1 Implicated in Motility of Clostridium difficile  Magdalena Schacherl,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Structural Basis for Apelin Control of the Human Apelin Receptor
Presentation transcript:

Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1 Luxin Sun, Yuhao Huang, Ross A. Edwards, Sukmin Yang, Andrew N. Blackford, Wojciech Niedzwiedz, J.N. Mark Glover  Structure  Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1582-1588.e3 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.08.005 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2017 25, 1582-1588.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 BLM Interacts with TopBP1 via pSer304, Not pSer338 (A) Sequence alignment of BLM orthologs around pSer304 and pSer338. Phosphorserine residues are colored in purple, hydrophobic residues are colored in green, and negatively charged residues are colored in red. (B) TopBP1 BRCT4/5 binds more tightly to BLM pSer304 than BLM pSer338. GST-hTopBP1 BRCT5 protein was titrated against BLM phosphopeptides corresponding to either the pSer304 or pSer338 regions and binding was monitored by fluorescence polarization (FP) spectroscopy. (C) TopBP1 BRCT4/5 binds BLM pSer304 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. BLM pSer304 peptide was dephosphorylated by treatment with λ-phosphatase (+) and its interaction with GST-hTopBP1 BRCT5 protein was measured by FP. BLM pSer304 peptide mock-treated without λ-phosphatase (−) or with heat-inactivated phosphatase (HI) were also included as controls. (D) Structural overview of TopBP1 BRCT4/5 in complex with pSer304 BLM peptide. An electrostatic charge surface is displayed for TopBP1 BRCT4/5, while the modeled BLM phosphopeptide is shown in pink sticks. See also Figures S1–S3 and Table S1. Structure 2017 25, 1582-1588.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of TopBP1 Recognition of BLM and MDC1 (A) Structural comparison of TopBP1-BLM and TopBP1-MDC1 complexes. Mouse TopBP1-BLM complex (left) and human TopBP1-MDC1 (right) are aligned by their BRCT5 main-chain Cα positions. Both TopBP1 BRCT structures are displayed with semi-transparent surface over a gray cartoon, while the BLM peptide is displayed as a pink cartoon and the MDC1 peptide is displayed as a blue cartoon. Key interacting residues are displayed as sticks, and hydrogen bonds are indicated by yellow dashed lines. Note that the region in mouse TopBP1 N-terminal to BRCT4/5 is three residues larger than the human protein. As a result, the numbers for homologous residues are three larger for mouse compared with human. (B) Comparison of the binding affinities of BLM and MDC1 phosphopeptides for a panel of human TopBP1 BRCT5 variants using FP. Wild-type (WT) TopBP1 BRCT5 as well as a panel of eight missense variants were titrated against either BLM phosphopeptide (left) or the MDC1 phosphopeptide (right) and their binding affinities were assessed by FP. The error bars represent the SD of at least three individual FP measurements. (C) Effects of human TopBP1 BRCT5 missense mutations on the binding of either MDC1 or BLM. The fold increase in KD is plotted for each BRCT5 variant normalized against the binding affinity for the WT. Results for BRCT5-MDC1 interactions are shown in blue, while the results for BRCT5-BLM interactions are shown in pink. The inset shows the relative difference in KD between WT BRCT5-MDC1 and WT BRCT5-BLM. Structure 2017 25, 1582-1588.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TopBP1 BRCT5 May Bind BLM and 53BP1 through Similar Mechanisms (A) Structures of Rad4TopBP1 BRCT repeats bound to Crb253BP1. Rad4 BRCT1/Crb2 (left) and Rad4 BRCT2/Crb2 (right) structures (PDB: 4BU0) are aligned with the TopBP1/BLM complex as in Figure 2A. Both structures have surface and cartoon displayed for Rad4TopBP1 (BRCT1 in orange, BRCT2 in green) and only a cartoon displayed for Crb253BP1 (blue). Interacting residues are displayed as sticks. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by yellow dashed lines. (B) Sequence alignment of the peptide binding region TopBP1 BRCT5 homologs. Residues from the positively charged β2′-β3′ loop are colored blue, residues from the phosphate binding pocket are colored purple, and residues lining the hydrophobic groove are colored green. (C) Sequence alignment of BLM, Crb2, and 53BP1 phosphopeptide partners for TopBP1 BRCT5. Phosphorylated residues are colored purple, negatively charged residues are colored red, and hydrophobic residues are colored green. (D) Sequence alignment of potential TopBP1 BRCT5 binding regions in 53BP1 homologs. Coloring is as in Figure 3C. Structure 2017 25, 1582-1588.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions