Design Tools 1 William Oakes, P.E Director of EPICS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STEM Project Design Science Technology Engineering and Math STEM Service-Learning Summer institute Sacramento State University August 5-7, 2009.
Advertisements

PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
Mahmut Ali GÖKÇEIndustrial Systems Engineering Lecture 2 System Identification ISE102 Spring 2007.
How to Map a Sales Process That Creates Value for Customers! July 2003.
Project Management.
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Chapter 10 Schedule Your Schedule. Copyright 2004 by Pearson Education, Inc. Identifying And Scheduling Tasks The schedule from the Software Development.
Failure Effect Mode Analysis
Teaching Design William Oakes. Learning Objectives At the end of this session, you will be able to: 1.Describe design 2.List at least three steps in the.
Design Tools 1 William Oakes. Learning Objectives At the end of this session, you will be able to: 1.Describe a decision matrix 2.Categorize potential.
Teaching Design William Oakes. Learning Objectives At the end of this session, you will be able to: 1.Describe design 2.List at least three steps in the.
Project Risk Management
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
Conceptual Design.
Popcorn Sample PFMEA: Process Flow
Auditing A Risk-Based Approach To Conducting A Quality Audit
 Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.
Part II Project Planning © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Personal Software Process Overview CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
Barry Murash MBBit Nortel 2007
Systems Engineering – Risk Analysis with FMEA
F.M.E.A (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
4.1 EbD Human-Centered Design 1 ® ®. Essential Question: ® How can the Human-Centered design model help frame my project and how will all the information.
Quality Function Deployment
CPSC 871 John D. McGregor Module 4 Session 3 Architecture Evaluation.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Managing Risk. Objectives  To Describe Risk Management concepts and techniques  To calculate and analyze a project using Probability of completion 
Design Documentation in ME 2110 Jeffrey Donnell MRDC June, 2010.
TQM TECHNIQUES BENCHMARKING Target key areas for improvement within operations – Increase productivity, competitiveness, and quality – Quality results.
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
Root Cause Tutorial Page 1 More on Hazard Identification Techniques 1.Identify potential hazards that could threaten the safety of your employees,
Tingxuan Liu Risk Management in Software engineering.
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
Advance to the next slide when ready to start $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Sample.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
RCM Tools Histogram Pareto Chart Cause and Effect Diagram FMEA.
Product Design and Development
Software Architecture Evaluation Methodologies Presented By: Anthony Register.
Collaborative Problem Solving
Project & Risk Management
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Risk Approach to Manage USACE Dam and Levee Safety Program The Reality of Risk: Dam Safety in.
John D. McGregor Architecture Evaluation
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part II Project Planning.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Concept Selection and DFMEA Heidi Ploeg Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
© 2015 IHS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Genstar Capital Acquires IHS Operational Excellence & Risk Management Business Ensuring the Success of Global EMIS Projects.
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Project Planning: Scope and the Work Breakdown Structure
Quality Function Deployment
Ranjan kumar Assistant Manager CCL,Ranchi
Project Management BBA & MBA
FMEA.
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Causes/ failure mechanisms Product definition
Improvement Selection:
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Determine Causes/ mechanisms failure
Failure mode and effect analysis
PDCA Problem Solving Guide
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Part II Project Planning © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
DMAIC Analyze, Improve, Control
Applicable Areas Business Logic Case Presentation Cost Design
The Certified Quality Process Handbook Chapter 22: Preventive Action
MINGGU KE 9: PROSES DESAIN PRODUK BARU
Tools for Implementation
Tools for Implementation
Potential Failure Mode Analysis 4th Edition
PFMEA Summary Process Steps
Presentation transcript:

Design Tools 1 William Oakes, P.E Director of EPICS Assoc. Prof. Engineering Education

Learning Objectives At the end of this session, you will be able to: Describe a specification Describe a decision matrix Categorize potential failures for a design Perform a functional decomposition Create a personna

EPICS Balance Service Learning Service-learning is a balance of the learning of design and the service we contribute the communities through completed designs and support Service To our partners, meeting needs in the community Learning Becoming good designers, professionals & active citizens Complimentary goals that enhance each other

Design Tool: Engineering specifications

Specifications Development What does your project partner need? Don’t just rely on what they want, find out what they need Understand the problems and issues you are addressing Who will use product and who will benefit from it? Gather Data Talk to Project Partner and others impacted by the project How will the problem be worked? Criteria for design teams How will teams be integrated Transition plans for multiple semesters Gather input from project partner on specifications Develop a specifications document and share it

Customer Requirements Types of customer requirements Functional performance Human factors Physical Time (reliability) Cost Standards Test Method Service & maintenance

Customer Requirements For a cell phone, make a list of Ten customer requirements

Design Specifications Answers the “how” question Quantified Should be able to measure whether you meet it Objective quantities A set of units should be associated with each specification Forms the basis for your specifications document

Design Requirements Starting with the customer requirements for a cell phone, make a list of design requirements

Defining Requirements Benchmarks What is available Why did they use their approach Patent searches avoid infringement Protect IP Are we smarter than everyone else? Or did we miss something?

Design Targets Set standards to meet with your design How good is good Can be a living document Don’t compromise on goals, but refine as the design progresses Tool make design trade offs Design decisions Communication with project partner

Decision Matrix Table with alternatives Quantify categories and score alternatives Importance in different categories Use judgement to do reality checks Leaves documentation of thought process of design Can be shared in design reviews

Criteria for Comparison Decision Matrix   Ideas to be compared Criteria for Comparison Weights Scores Totals

Decision Matrix Example: Getting a Job Criteria Wts Co. A Co. B Co. C Co. D Location 5 5x5=25 5x1=5 5x3=15 5x4=20 Salary 4 Bonus 2 Job 3 Training Boss Totals

Design Tool: Defining the System

Functional Decomposition Breaking tasks or functions of the system down to the finest level Create a tree diagram starting at the most general function of your system What is the purpose of your system? Break this function down into simpler subtasks or subfunctions Continue until you are at the most basic functions or tasks

Functional Decomposition Diagram Overall Function Subfunction 1 Subfunction 2 Subfunction 3

Sample Diagram – Bike Fender Protect rider from water and dirt off wheel Shield rider Steer water away from rider Attach Splashguard

Functional Decomposition Each function has a box with An action verb The object(s) on which the verb acts Possibly a modifier giving details of the function Known flows of materials, energy, control or information Consider WHAT not HOW

Create a functional decomposition diagram for a mechanical pencil Prepare them to share

DFMEA : Design for Robustness

DFMEA Steps Review the design Brainstorm potential failure modes List potential effects of failure Rank failures Severity Occurrence Detection RPN = Severity X Occurrence X Detection Develop action plan Implement fixes Revisit potential failure risks

Describe the project so the whole group understands it In a group, Identify one project to use as an example for this exercise Describe the project so the whole group understands it

Brainstorm Failures What could go wrong? What could break? Are there systems your design relies upon? e.g. myEPICS software authenticates through Purdue’s career accounts. What if the server goes down? Are there things that could fail over time?

Brainstorm a list of potential failures for the project

Rate failures Severity Occurrence Detection Rating (1 to 10) How severe are the consequences to the failure Occurrence How often are the failures likely to occur? Detection How easily are the failures detected?

DFMEA Calculations Scores for Severity, Occurrence and Detection 1 to 10 1 = Low 10 = High Risk Priority Number (RPN) RPN =Severity X Occurrence X Detection

DFMEA Matrix Failure mode Effect of Failure Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Rating

Example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure_mode_and_effects_analysis, accessed 22 Aug. 2011

Example Chart

Identify the failure scenario that should be addressed first

Develop an action plan to address the failure scenario

Continue the process Implement the plan to eliminate the failure scenario Revisit other potential failure risks Prioritize Eliminate failure scenarios Continue until risks are below determined thresholds Show to the design reviews for confirmation

Questions/Discussion