Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
Advertisements

P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Paul Emma LCLS Commissioning Status Nov. 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 LCLS Commissioning Status P. Emma for The.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
LLRF Phase Reference System The LCLS linac is broken down into 4 separate linac sections. The LCLS injector will reside in an off axis tunnel at the end.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
TTF-II Status & Prospectives Nick Walker DESY 5 th ITRP Meeting – CALTECH.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
X-band Based FEL proposal
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Cutting Beam Horns in BC1
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
FPC Coupler RF Dipole Kick
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
XFEL Beam Physics 10/30/2015 Tor Raubenheimer.
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Recent high-gradient testing results from the CLIC XBoxes
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
WG2 Summary: Diagnostics, measurements, and commissioning
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
LCLS Linac Update Brief Overview L1 & BC1 Progress LTU & E-Dump Status Continuing Resolution Impact.
Injector –Linac Status & Schedule E. Bong LCLS FAC October 12, 2006
LCLS Gun Commissioning Status & Plans David H
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
Electron Source Configuration
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
RF Pulse Shaping.
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
LCLS Linac Overview E. Bong Lehman Review August 10, 2004
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
Design of Compression and Acceleration Systems Technical Challenges
LCLS Commissioning P. Emma, et al
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac LLP Outline LINAC Long Lead Procurements
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Breakout Sessions SC1/SC2 – Accelerator Physics
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Breakout Session SC5 – Control Systems
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
LCLS Injector Commissioning P
Low Level RF Status Outline Overview showing hardware instances
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback System and Bunch Length Monitor Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS DOE Review, February 08, 2006 LCLS longitudinal.
SuperKEKB required (e+ / e-)
Presentation transcript:

Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems

LCLS RF systems RF Gun 23MW 5.75MV, ~115MV/M Laser 30° from crest Standing Wave structure OTR screens (7) YAG screens (7) Wire scanners (7) L0A 35MW, 57MV, ~20MV/m 2° nominal (usually on crest) Dipole magnets (8) Beam stoppers (2) S-band RF acc. sections (5) L0B 60MW, 72MV, ~24MV/m 10° nominal (usually on crest) L1S 147MV, 20MV/m 25° nominal Transverse Cavity 2MW, 1.4MV ~4MV/m 180° transverse : diagnostic 250MeV 50% 25% 25% 2-km point in 3-km SLAC linac L1S 135MeV BC1 L1X X-band ~20MW, 20MV, 33MV/M 160° nominal OTR

General RF System Design

RF Gun

RF Gun System Specifics Standing wave structure – field probes to measure RF Contains vacuum sensitive cathode – want to avoid arcs: Hardware RF power interlock. Hi Q system, needs precise temperature control to stay on resonance. Gun operates at high peak field – 115MV/M.

Gun RF Performance Amplitude Jitter 0.04% Phase Jitter .053° Spec 0.1% Phase Jitter .053° Spec 0.1° (but same read back as feedback) Good Reliability

RF Gun Issues Minimal problems Field probes overheat at high rate, limited to 30 Hz. Re-designed probes to be tested on Gun 2. Software RF feedback can cause problems with interaction with modulator hardware trips. Software tries to maximize power during hardware RF power ramp.

L0A RF System Standard S-band RF system Noise problems (modulator Thyratron?) 0.2% amplitude Spec 0.14% 0.16° Spec 0.14° System operates with good reliability

L0B RF System Standard S-band RF system Good Jitter .024% amplitude Spec 0.14% .043° Phase Spec 0.14°

L0B RF System Overall Excellent jitter (amplitude and phase) performance. Shows how well the S-band Modulator / Klystron can work! Had some processing problems early in the run (L0B is our highest gradient S-band structure), but seems OK now. L0B Amplitude normally run in feedback for energy stability. RF long term stability < 1% p-p.

Transverse Cavity RF system Standard S-band RF system Operates 90° off crest. Jitter OK, but fliers .017% amplitude 0.15° phase Regularly used as a diagnostic

L1-S RF System

Uses SLED cavity to drive 3 structures L1S System Specifics Uses SLED cavity to drive 3 structures Operates 25° off crest to provide acceleration and energy chirp for compression 147MV, 135MeV energy gain Phase noise important, off crest operation converts phase noise to bunch length and arrival time error.

L1S System Operation Amplitude noise: 0.043% Phase noise 0.10° Spec is 0.14% Phase noise 0.10° Spec is 0.14° Long term stability from beam feedback (BC1 energy)

L1X RF System Uses 60cm X-band structure XL-4 Klystron Originally developed as part of Next Linear Collider Project. Operates at ~33MV/M NLC gradient ~70MV/M XL-4 Klystron Operating at 20MW Design 50MW X-band operates 160° off crest (net deceleration) to compensate for curvature of energy vs. time from S-band.

System reliability has been good L1X RF System Amplitude noise 0.62% Spec is 0.25% Phase noise 1.2° Spec is 0.5° System reliability has been good

L1X Transverse Kicks L1X produces an unexpectedly strong transverse kick on the beam. Kick is ~50 degrees out of phase with energy gain. Adjusted timing of RF to eliminate power in couplers during beam passage – did not reduce kick. Not yet understood Emittance vs position Transverse kick Vs. phase Energy vs. phase

Noise and Stability Issues Noise measurements shown were performed with the same sensors that are used in feedback. Not really a fair measurement. Beam based energy measurements also used in feedback Just beginning serious measurements of noise and stability: Initial indications are that overall phase noise is < 1°, but doesn’t yet meet the 0.1° requirement. Low noise on individual stations indicates that the high power components are capable of meeting the spec.

Study noise / stability Near Term Plans Study noise / stability Multiple measurements available: Beam phase cavities, beam energy, bunch length monitors etc. Lack of a single “gold standard” for measuring phase complicates things Study X-band deflection, wakefields, emittance growth. May remove the cavity during the down-time (Sept 07) for RF measurements.

RF operates with good reliability. Overall RF Status RF operates with good reliability. All systems running at design gradient. Gun currently at 5.75MV, not 6, but believe we can turn up at any time. Phase noise needs some work, but high power equipment seems OK Need to investigate transverse effects in L1X.