Legal Framework, Investment Opportunities and Technical Innovation in the Electricity Sector Security of Supply through competitive markets: Design of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Review of the Reserves and OpCap Markets: New Englands Experience in the First Four Months Peter Cramton Professor of Economics, University of Maryland.
Advertisements

1 FREQUENCY LINKED DISPATCH AND ELECTRICITY PRICING (An unconventional approach for tackling the peculiar problems existing in India) - Bhanu Bhushan -
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Electricity and Natural Gas Supply, Reserves, and Resource Adequacy CMTA Energy Conference Energy: Growing Californias Economy William J. Keese California.
MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Permanent High Level Group meeting Athens, September 9 th, 2003 Towards a Standard Market Design for the SE Europe Electricity Market Prof. P. Capros,
0 - 0.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
Argentine Power Sector
The Single Electricity Market in Ireland
1 WHY WE NEED AN ICAP MARKET IN NEW ENGLAND Presentation By: Dr. Richard A. Rosen Tellus Institute Boston, MA To: Massachusetts Electric Restructuring.
ENERGY MARKET REFORM: Gas Transportation & Distribution Issues Presentation to GTE 2 nd Annual Conference by Gerald Doucet Secretary General, World Energy.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MIDWEST ISO By Bill Malcolm Manager-State Regulatory Affairs Pierre, South Dakota June 9, 2006.
FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
1 HELLENIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR THE NEW MARKET MODEL AND GRID CODE IN GREECE Dr. Evangelos Lekatsas Chairman of the Board of Directors, HTSO Bucharest.
Energy and Telecommunications Interim Committee January 29, 2004.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
Generation Adequacy through Backstop Call Option Obligations Shmuel S. Oren University of California at Berkeley Presented at CREG Workshop, Bogotá, Colombia.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
1 Resource Adequacy and Market Power Mitigation via Option Contracts Hung-po Chao and Robert Wilson EPRI and Stanford University Presentation at POWER.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
1 RELIABILITY AND COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POWER Research Conference UC Berkeley March 19, 2004 Paul Joskow MIT, CEEPR, CMI and Jean Tirole IDEI,
A Capacity Market that Makes Sense Peter Cramton & Steven Stoft 18 March 2005.
Wind Power in Ireland: Treatment of wind in the Single Electricity Market APEx Conference, Paris 16 th October 2007.
Financing new electricity supply in the UK market with carbon abatement constraints Keith Palmer 08 March 2006 AFG.
New Zealand & Australian Wholesale Electricity Markets A Comparative Review Dr Ralph Craven Transpower NZ Ltd.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
RISK & CAPACITY INVESTMENT INCENTIVES IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS Peter Jackson Department Of Management University Of Canterbury.
©2003 PJM Factors Contributing to Wholesale Electricity Prices Howard J. Haas Market Monitoring Unit November 30, 2006.
World Forum on Energy Regulation IV Athens, Greece October , 2009 "Reducing Regulatory and Technological Barriers to Demand Side Participation“
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
8 Halswell St PO Box Thorndon WELLINGTON New Zealand While Strata Energy.
Overview of the Capacity Markets in the United States 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13-14, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Leader-Follower Framework For Control of Energy Services Ali Keyhani Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University
Capacity mechanisms in Europe The fundamental issues behind the ongoing sector enquiry Session 2 - If a capacity mechanism, which design is most appropriate?
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
 Sharon Jacobs Harvard Law School. 1) Order 719 2) RICE Rules 3) Bigger-picture regulatory questions.
Electricity pricing Tariffs.
Demand Response
To Buy or To Build Is it really one or the other? APPA New Generation Workshop Portland, Oregon August 1, 2007.
Wholesale Electricity Markets: Opportunities and Challenges Howard HaasUSAEE October 27, 2015.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Ensuring Generation Adequacy
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Long-term Capacity Market
The Brazilian Power Sector Reform
Locational ICAP in New England
ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PROJECTS IN THE BSEC REGION
Energy Supply Business Model enabled by the Clean Energy Package
Presentation transcript:

Legal Framework, Investment Opportunities and Technical Innovation in the Electricity Sector Security of Supply through competitive markets: Design of the regulatory and economic environment for infrastructure development Dr. Evangelos Lekatsas Chairman of the Board of Directors, HTSO Athens, October 23 rd 2009 HTSO 1

2 Reliability of Supply "the degree to which the performance of the elements of the technical system results in power being delivered to consumers within accepted standards and in the amount desired SecurityAdequacy

3 Security vs Adequacy Security: The ability of the System to withstand disturbances Protection devices Security constrained dispatch Ancillary services (voltage control, AGC, spinning reserves etc.) NOTE: Security is centrally managed but the resources can be procured competitively through ancillary service markets or long term contracts (Public good)

4 Security vs Adequacy (continued) Adequacy: The ability of the System to meet the aggregate power & energy requirements of all consumers at all times Ability to meet demand on longer time scale basis Non storability of power Long lead time for capacity expansion NOTE: Adequacy provision is nothing more than insurance against shortages

Generation Adequacy (I) Energy only markets: Consumers and suppliers interact through unrestricted energy spot markets. Market energy prices provide price signals and compensation for capacity investment. Technology mix and generation capacity are determined by entry and exit of suppliers and by customer choice of desired price risk. Energy only markets result in extreme spike prices. As a remedy to this Capacity Markets have been introduced to avoid price volatility. The purpose of these markets is to ensure that there is sufficient capacity in the System to cover peak demand and at the same time avoid price volatility.

Generation Adequacy (II) Installed Capacity (Icap) Obligation markets : In an ICap market Installed Capacity Obligations are set for Load Representatives (or Suppliers, or Load Serving Entities= LSEs).Suppliers are obliged to secure contracts with producers sufficient to meet their expected load for one year, plus a security excess that reflects a prescribed Capacity Margin. Producers in order to enter into Agreements with Suppliers are obliged to have sufficient capacity by issuing, for each MW, annual Capacity Availability Certificates (CACs) when commissioning new generating capacity. This method does not provide any signal to the Consumers.

Generation Adequacy (III) Capacitive Charge To incentivize investment in new power plants and availability Generators receive, in addition to SMP, a Capacity Charge (CC) based on availability, as expressed by the calculated Loss Of Load Probability (LOLP), and the Value of Lost Load (VLL). P=SMP + CC = SMP+LOLP*{VLL-SMP} This method was initially applied in UK. It is not a market but a mechanism. It was abandoned when it was proved that some generators could artificially increase LOLP by withdrawing some of their units.

The Value of Lost Load VLL = 5000 /MWh 8 HTSO

9 Load Variations: Summer January ,0k

10 Load Curve: Oct 1 st 2006 –Sept 30 th 2007 Peak Detail in next slide

11

(/year) (/MWh) f c =fixed cost in /MW-year v c =variable cost in /MWh Q= installed capacity in MW E= annual energy generation in MWh/year b= energy market price in /MWh r= capacity payments price in /MW-year Recovery of Fixed and Variable Generation Costs 12 HTSO

(/year) (/MWh) f c =56000 /MW-year v c =112 /MWh Q= 1000 MW E= 7300 MWh b= 7783 /MWh > VLL=5000 /MWh Decision= Curtail Peak 1000MW !!!!! Recovery of Fixed and Variable Generation Costs ( Case I: Energy only Market, r =0) 13 HTSO

(/year) (/MWh) f c =56000 /MW-year v c =112 /MWh Q= 1000 MW E= 7300 MWh r=35000 /MW-year b= 2989 /MWh < VLL=5000 /MWh Value b of energy is still unacceptable (high) Introduce a CAP such that b< CAP Recovery of Fixed and Variable Generation Costs ( Case II: Energy + Capacity Market, r 0) 14 HTSO

(/year) (/MWh) f c =56000 /MW-year v c =112 /MWh Q= 1000 MW E= 7300 MWh CAP= 150 /MWh r> /MW-year b< CAP=150 /MWh Recovery of Fixed and Variable Generation Costs ( Case III: Capped Energy + Capacity Market) 15 HTSO

16

17 HTSO

18 Right shift of the Supply Curve due to increase of NPB / MWh CAP L, System Load, MW MW Supply Curve Demand Curve SMP 0 NPD = Non Priced Demand SMP 1 NPB ο NPB 1 L0L0 L1L1 With L 1 >L 0 SMP 1 <SMP 0 Non Priced Bids (NPB) Mandatory Hydro ~1800MW RES ~ 300MW Technical Min ~3000MW Imports ~ 700MW TOTAL= 5800MW

19

20

21

22 EPILOGUE The market expresses the will of human beings to meet at the point of equilibrium of supply with demand by maximizing the, so called, Social Surplus. But the will of human beings, especially when expressed in terms of conflicting economic interests, may lead the power system to risky levels of operation. Indeed, following the liberalisation over the past 2 decades, some power systems have been pushed towards their stability limits in order to maximize profit in energy trading, thus endangering the operation of the power system. It is very important to understand that power systems must operate within safe physical limits and with adequate reserves in order to maintain high standards of supply. This creates a cost we must not forget!

Acknowledgments I would like to thank my colleagues in HTSO for their valuable discussions in preparing this presentation THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 23 HTSO