DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Montalescot G, et al. Lancet 2009;373: Trial profile Montalescot G, et al. Lancet 2009;373:
Advertisements

Stone p2203/Abstract/ Conclusions
Stent Parameters Predict Major Adverse Clinical Events and the Response to Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade Findings of the ESPRIT Trial James E.
Professor Abdus Samad MD FACC Karachi Institute of Heart Diseases Karachi, Pakistan May 1, 2010.
TOTAL Stroke in the TOTAL trial: Randomized trial of manual aspiration Thrombectomy in STEMI TOTAL Trial Investigators.
Effect of Switching Antithrombin Agents for Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction The HORIZONS-SWITCH Analysis HORIZONS AMI Dangas G, et al.
EXAMINATION Objective Assess the safety and performance of a new-generation DES vs. a BMS in the setting of primary PCI for treatment of patients with.
比伐卢定在 STEMI 中的应用价值 王乐丰 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院心脏中心. Goals of STEMI PCI Establish reperfusion of IRA ASAP Limit complications Limit costs Achieve excellent long.
on behalf of the TOTAL Investigators
High-Dose, Double-Bolus Eptifibatide (Integrilin™) in Non- Urgent Coronary Stent Intervention 6 Month Results of the ESPRIT Trial.
Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent for Acute Myocardial Infarction STRATEGY Trial Journal of the American Medical.
Harmonizing Outcomes with RevascularIZatiON and Stents (HORIZONS) Trial HORIZONS Trial.
NSTE Acute Coronary Syndromes
TLR Funnel plot (according to outcomes) for studies included in the meta-analysis Death A TVR B MACE DC SE(log OR)
The MASTER Trial A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Evaluation of a PET Micronet Mesh Covered Stent (MGuard) in STEMI Sigmund Silber, MD, PhD FESC,
IRIS Trial design: Patients without diabetes with a history of stroke or TIA within 6 months, with objective evidence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value.
The MASS-DAC Study.
PRAGUE-18 Trial design: Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to prasugrel (n = 634) versus ticagrelor (n = 596). Results (p = 0.94)
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
DAPT Trial design: Patients undergoing DES/BMS PCI, no ischemic/bleeding complications, and with documented compliance at 1 year, were randomized to receive.
Dual Goals for the Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease (SIHD)
ATLANTIC Trial design: Participants with STEMI being transported for primary PCI were randomized in the ambulance to ticagrelor 180 mg (n = 909) vs. placebo.
Angiography-guided PCI
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at high risk for CV events were randomized to receive in a 1:1:1 fashion either.
Learning Objectives PLATO Primary Efficacy End Point CV Death, MI, or Stroke.
Primary endpoint at 1 year
EXCEL Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with an Xience everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or CABG. They.
Compare-Acute Trial design: STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (n.
European Society of Cardiology 2003
ANTARCTIC Trial design: Patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stenting were randomized to tailored antiplatelet therapy (n = 435) versus conventional.
EXCITE ISR Trial design: Participants with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis were randomized to excimer laser atherectomy + adjunctive angioplasty (n.
SMILE Trial design: NSTEMI patients were randomized to complete revascularization during the index procedure (i.e., 1-stage revascularization; n = 264)
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5.
EVERBIO II Trial design: Patients with CAD were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either Absorb BVS, Biomatrix Flex stent [BES], or Promus Element EES.
Outcome Relative risk with beta blockers 95% CI Stroke –1.30
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
LATITUDE-TIMI 60 Trial design: Patients hospitalized with AMI on guideline-recommended therapy were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either losmapimod 7.5.
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
BASKET-PROVE II Trial design: Subjects with stable or unstable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation were randomized to a biodegradable-polymer.
Impact of clopidogrel loading dose on the safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:
ZEUS Trial design: Patients who were deemed uncertain DES candidates due to bleeding, thrombotic, or restenosis risk were randomized to receive either.
EXPLORE Trial design: Patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI and with evidence of noninfarct artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) were randomized.
RIDDLE-NSTEMI Trial design: Patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either immediate (within 2 hours) intervention or delayed (within 72 hours) intervention.
(p = 0.32 for noninferiority)
Drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis
BRAVO-3 Trial design: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to bivalirudin or UFH. They were followed for 30 days. Results.
Ezetimibe/simvastatin
Role of Stenting in Acute MI: PAMI Stent Pilot Trial
Mancini JG, et al. Am J Cardiol.
Long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical care patients 36-month follow-up in the SORT OUT.
Elevated Admission Plasma Glucose Following ACS
Ischemic Postconditioning
SMART-STRATEGY Trial design: Patients with a bifurcation coronary lesion were randomized to a conservative strategy (n = 128) vs. an aggressive strategy.
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ITALIC Trial design: Patients with Xience V (everolimus-eluting stent) PCI were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive 6 or 24 months of dual antiplatelet.
Primary safety endpoint
(A) Primary cardiovascular outcome: risk of major adverse cardiovascular effects (MACE) between triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT) versus dual antiplatelet.
Chest Pain Choice Trial design: Patients presenting to the ED with low risk chest pain were randomized to either use of a tailored decision aid or routine.
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
IVUS-XPL Trial design: Patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary lesions were randomized to IVUS-guided PCI (n = 700) vs. angiography-guided.
IMPRESS Trial design: Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI and cardiogenic shock were randomized in a 1:1 to either Impella CP or IABP. They were.
(p for non-inferiority < 0.001)
FIELD: Primary outcome
NOBLE Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) (88% biolimus) or CABG. They.
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Presentation transcript:

DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting with TIMI 2-3 flow were randomized to stent implantation after 48 hours or immediate stenting. They were followed for 42 months. Results (p = 0.92) The primary outcome, MACE, for deferred vs. immediate stenting: 17% vs. 18%; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75-1.29, p = 0.92 All-cause mortality: 7% vs. 9%, p = 0.37; MI: 7% vs. 7%, p = 0.77; unplanned target vessel revascularization (TVR): 7% vs. 4%, p = 0.03 LVEF at 18 months: 60% vs. 57%, p = 0.04 % Conclusions Deferred stenting at the time of primary PCI in STEMI patients was not superior for adverse CV outcomes compared with immediate stenting (which is conventional practice) Deferred stenting was associated with a higher risk of unplanned TVR Primary endpoint Deferred stenting (n = 603) Immediate PCI (n = 612) Kelbæk H, et al. Lancet 2016;387:2199-2206