Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Advertisements

EARTHS WATER SUPPLY. SOME QUICK FACTS 70% of the Earths surface is covered with water 70% of the Earths surface is covered with water 97% of Earths water.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Stormwater, Wellhead Protection and Drainage Issues Public Hearing.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Pollution Risk to Watersheds in Loudoun County GIS 200 May 11, 2009.
Capitol Hill Oceans Week Wetlands Restoration Panel June 8, 2005 JOHN H. DUNNIGAN Ecosystem Goal Lead Capitol Hill Oceans Week June 8, 2005.
Stormwater Target Watersheds: Methods and Maps February In Support of 2013 Solicitation for Proposals to Conduct Stormwater Retrofit Planning and.
1 Storm Water Management: Using GIS to Direct Non-Point Source Pollution Mitigation Efforts in the Eagleville Brook Watershed Jason Parent
Watershed Forestry Initiative Ellen Kohler Attorney & Policy Specialist Funded in part by Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Urban.
Conversion of Pine Lands to Irrigated Row Crops; Who Would Have Guessed? Large losses of native and grassland habitats across the state has received a.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Green- Duwamish River Watershed
GIS Tools Workflow of GIS Tools to Determine Properties Suitable for Migratory Bird Foraging Sites.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Water Resources Water is essential to life on Earth.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Modeling bacteria flow from wildlife in the Leon River Basin, TX Sonny Kwon.
BaCon Makes Everything Better! Final Report. Ekaterina Troudonochina Julian Montejano Mark Hiler Veronica Gentile Team Manager Webmaster, GIS Analyst.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Agenda Overview of meeting topics 9:30 AMIntroduction and Agenda Review 9:45 AMSelect Regional Allocation Option and Process Steps for 2006 SRFB Funding.
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
al-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/28/hawaii- lava-flow-advances-now-less-than-100- yards-from-nearest-home-in- pahoa/?hpid=z3http://
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Protecting our Watershed. What is a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that drains into a body of water: –Stream –River –Lake (Let’s take a look!)Let’s.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Presented to: Severn River Association 2008 State of the Severn Anne Arundel County Government Department of Public Works Ron Bowen, P.E. October 21, 2008.
Peter Hummel, ASLA, Anchor Environmental Living with the Nearshore: Beaches, Seawalls and What lies in Between Presented to Prepared by May 13, 2005 University.
Lee County Water Resource Initiative: Community Sustainability Committee June 16, 2010 Kurt Harclerode Operations Manager Lee County Natural Resources.
 More of What Is a Watershed  Why do we delineate our watershed?  Obtaining Topographic Maps Online  Reading A Topographic Map  How to Delineate a.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
Waterbody Classification Project A project of the Lakes and Watershed Commission, Dane County Department of Planning and Development, and the Dane County.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Ocean/ENVIR 260 Autumn 2010Lecture 13© 2010 University of Washington Ocean/Envir 260 Lecture 13: Overview, Land Use Law 1.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Ocean/ENVIR 260 Autumn 2010Lecture 9© 2010 University of Washington Ocean/Envir 260 Lecture #9: Unique Issues: Elwha River, Duwamish River, and San Juan.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
CHAPTER 11 - WATER Section 1 – Water Resources – Pt 1.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
References/Acknowledgments
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
William Cooter Presenting NLCD2001 Impervious Cover Information for DWMA Analytical Source Protection Areas (SPAs) William Cooter
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Critical Linkages: Identifying Culvert Replacement Priorities to Maintain Connectivity of Cold Water Streams in the Face of Climate Change Scott Jackson,
Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
Critical Reef Fish Habitats, Fishing Regulations, and Active Drilling Leases in the Gulf of Mexico by Tierney Dodge ’14 Introduction Human activities have.
Watersheds Vocabulary
Protecting our Watershed
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2017
Combined Sewer Overflows in Seattle, WA
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
Abiotic factor The non-living parts of an ecosystem – dirt and water.
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2013
Fresh, Clean Water.
Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County
Research Question Study Area = Twin Cities 7 County Metro
Moving Our Coastal Lakes Into a Healthier and More Resilient Future
Unit: Water and the Atmosphere
Building a Community of Stewardship Through Water Monitoring
Watershed Vocabulary.
% Riparian Natural Cover
GIS & Land Preservation
Loss of Ecosystem Services of Wetlands
Presentation transcript:

Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County By Olivia Wright

Objective King County is approximately 1,400,805 acres and is covered by 8 watersheds. This study will assess the conditions of the watersheds to prioritize watershed protection in King County.

Watershed Health Analysis Watershed Area 303d listed streams Developed land use area Wetlands and Public Parks

Data 2008 Washington Water Quality Assessment 303(d) listed streams Washington 2006 land cover data Washington State Seamless Wetlands Data from National Wetlands Inventory Major Lakes in Washington State Washington Rivers and Connecting Water Bodies Watershed boundaries derived from terrain data King County Boundary Parks

Watersheds In King County

GIS Analysis Processes Spatial Analysis: Extract by Mask, Convert Raster to Polygons Selection Tools: Select by Attributes Analysis Tools: Clip and Spatial Join Other Tools: Join Tables, Export selected data, Calculate Geometry

Watershed Area (acres) 303d Listed Streams 303d listed streams are water bodies that violate water quality standards for one or more pollutant in accordance with the 1972 Clean Water Act. The condition of the watersheds were ranked based on the percentage of 303d listed streams within their boundaries. Watershed Watershed Area (acres) 303d Stream Area (acres) Percent 303d Streams 303d Ranking Cedar River / Lake Washington 234,206.79 8,458.28 3.61% 1 Central Puget Sound 59,006.73 1,721.65 2.92% 2 Duwamish - Green River 314,223.32 8,394.99 2.67% 3 Sammamish River 108,448.83 1,437.96 1.33% 4 Puyallup River 8,178.21 51.19 0.63% 5 Snoqualmie River 426,818.36 979.36 0.23% 6 White River 76,657.65 147.55 0.19% 7 Skykomish 173,264.58 260.97 0.15% 8

Watershed Area (acres) Developed Land Use Highly concentrated developed land use areas increase impervious surface and runoff into streams and have negative impacts on the health of watersheds. The condition of the watersheds were ranked based on the percent of developed land use area within their boundaries. Watershed Watershed Area (acres) Developed (acres) Percent Developed Developed Ranking Puyallup River 8,178.21 3,305.22 40.42% 1 Central Puget Sound 59,006.73 18,490.54 31.34% 2 Cedar River / Lake Washington 234,206.79 60,228.99 25.72% 3 Sammamish River 108,448.83 26,803.07 24.71% 4 Duwamish - Green River 314,223.32 51,741.37 16.47% 5 White River 76,657.65 3,980.31 5.19% 6 Snoqualmie River 426,818.36 13,110.78 3.07% 7 Skykomish 173,264.58 1,892.30 1.09% 8

National Wetland Inventory and Public Parks Wetlands in a watershed act as natural pollutant removal systems and will increase the health of a watershed. Wetlands and public parks were also taken into consideration to determine the feasibility of restoration for watershed protection. They have the potential to cause challenges regarding permitting issues and increasing the cost of watershed restoration. The condition of the watersheds were ranked based on the percent of wetland and park area within their boundaries.

National Wetland Inventory and Public Parks Watershed Watershed Area (acres) Sum of NWI and Park Areas Percent Area Park and NWI Duwamish - Green River 314,223.32 15,085.26 4.80% 1 White River 76,657.65 4,077.81 5.32% 2 Snoqualmie River 426,818.36 27,704.30 6.49% 3 Cedar River / Lake Washington 234,206.79 18,159.10 7.75% 4 Puyallup River 8,178.21 659.12 8.06% 5 Central Puget Sound 59,006.73 7,055.97 11.96% 6 Sammamish River 108,448.83 16,965.19 15.64% 7 Skykomish 173,264.58 149,486.52 86.28% 8

Final Watershed Prioritization Results After ranking the watersheds in King County based on each parameter, an overall watershed prioritization was determined by summing the rankings established for the 303d streams, developed areas, and NWI and public parks. The overall ranking showed the Cedar River / Lake Washington watershed as having the highest need for restoration based on watershed health and restoration feasibility. Watershed 303d Ranking Developed Ranking Park and NWI Ranking Sum of Rankings Final Watershed Prioritization Cedar River / Lake Washington 1 3 4 8 Duwamish - Green River 5 9 2 Central Puget Sound 6 10 Puyallup River 11 Sammamish River 7 15 White River Snoqualmie River 16 Skykomish 24

References: Washington State Geospatial Data Archive (WAGDA). http://wagda.lib.washington.edu/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/ State of Washington Department of Ecology. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/ecyhome.html National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center. http://www.csc.noaa.gov/index.html