Assessing Utility Mix Risks/Exposure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leaders in the design, implementation and operation of markets for electricity, gas and water. Portfolio Generation Investment Under Uncertainty Michael.
Advertisements

Why we believe 40% is the right thing to do. Gareth Allen Muireann Lynch Lisa Ruttledge Eamon Keane Sheila Nolan Leah McCabe John Kirby David Gibbons EirGrid.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
Carbon Markets: Volatility & Trading Institutions Craig Pirrong Bauer College of Business University of Houston.
1 ACT AND ADAPT: CLIMATE CHANGE IN SCOTLAND Climate Change Division.
Direct Use of Natural Gas. Tampa Electric Peoples Gas.
SGM P.R. Shukla. Second Generation Model Top-Down Economic Models  Project baseline carbon emissions over time for a country or group of countries 
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
1 Break out group 2-Technological developments and policies and measures Issues discussed: Hydrogen Energy efficiency Biomass and biofuels Infrastructure.
GLOBAL CHANGES CUTTING DEEP Economics of energy changing based on external global dynamics, particularly with OPEC Oil prices have fallen by more than.
THE CHALLENGES OF EUROPEAN ENERGY SECURITY Jiří Feist, CEZ Group.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
NARUC Joint Session, Committees on Electricity and Gas Ellen Lapson, CFA February 19, 2008.
Technologies of Climate Change Mitigation Climate Parliament Forum, May 26, 2011 Prof. Dr. Thomas Bruckner Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management.
Energy security Professor Jim Watson Director, Sussex Energy Group University of Sussex Research Fellow, The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
UCD Emissions Trading Workshop “Enterprise Perspective” 25 th April 2012.
Combining options for commitments AIXG, OECD, 22 March Combining options for commitments: results from modelling exercises Patrick Criqui, LEPII-EPE,
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION NATURAL GAS ASSESSMENT: SHORT AND LONG TERM Briefing to the Legislature Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee January.
Balanced Portfolio for Reliable Electricity System YES Inc. Brief Assessment.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers The way forward to a more efficient and effective EU-ETS IFIEC Europe‘s views Brussels,
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in the Northwest Power and Conservation Plan Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Northwest Experience with Energy Efficiency As A Resource Option Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
EIA’s April 2005 Analysis of Modeled NCEP Recommendations
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Kenya’s INDC: Actions in the Energy Sector
Nuclear Power Economics and Project Structuring 2017 Edition
Analyzing Energy Costs
The future of carbon emission and carbon taxation policies 10 October 2016 Jonathan Graham Head of Policy.
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
Scenarios & Developments: The Energy Industry between the Conflicting Priorities of Global Warming, Energy & Security AGN International World Congress.
Primary energy and energy intensity Energy consumption growth.
CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF THE KOREAN EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
The Role of Financial Leadership in a Challenging Economic Climate “Financial Management from a Provincial Perspective” Presented by: Bruce L. Bennett.
Energy and Climate Outlook
Squamish Neighbourhood Energy Utility: Final Feasibility Presentation
Preliminary Electricity Rate and Time of Use Rate Scenarios
Natural Gas Infrastructure Assessment
WORLD ENERGY OUTLOOK 2002 Focus on European Union
NS4960 Spring Term 2017 North America Energy Trilemma
Communicare Boom Flats Retrofit: Financial Analysis
Energy Justice – the policy challenges
Fuel Diversity for Electric Power Generation in New England
Entrepreneurship & Strategy
Next Steps: Analyzing Energy Costs and Performance Benchmarking
Outline Energy demand and prices Reserves and new sources of energy supply.
NS4960 Spring Term 2018 North America Energy Trilemma
Opening the Human Health Security Lens to Climate Change and Energy
Key elements of Finnish Climate change strategy
Jason Bordoff, Policy Director Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution
Performance Benchmarking
Trends in the Taxation of Canadian Motor Fuels By Robert Lyman © 2018
Energy Performance Trends
Engagement with Energy in the Future
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Ontario’s New System to Price Industrial Pollution Emissions Performances Standards (EPS) March 15, 2019.
Market Price Forecasts and PPA Rate Scenarios
Closed Schools: Analyzing Energy Costs
Oregon State Bar Sustainable Future
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
Scaling up of Renewable Energy for Power Generation in the Western Balkan countries
National electricity mixes
Environmental & Energy Policy
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Utility Mix Risks/Exposure UCD Training February 28, 2019

Risk Analysis Purpose To assess the potential long-term budget risks of future utility rate escalation Three areas of risk: Electricity prices Natural gas prices Carbon prices Rationale Balancing the utility mix will provide the ability to deal with potential future changes e.g. planning to replace all electric heating with gas heating equipment: carbon price and budget risk

Agenda Electricity e.g. policy change risk is a key driver Natural gas short-term volatility drivers e.g. weather Carbon prices e.g. policy – federal and provincial dynamic 2030 consensus that carbon needs to be US$100/tonne Water e.g. steadily increasing ~ 3 - 8% each year

Electricity Risk Policy Focus on reducing price Limited options for real reductions Potential changes to market rules like capacity markets Changing mix of nuclear generation Other Local electricity distributor delivery costs moving toward fixed rates (from volumetric rates) i.e. from current $/kWh per month to $ per month.

Electricity Projection Annual Change

Electricity Projection Cumulative Annual Change

Natural Gas Risk Market Prices remaining relatively steady for foreseeable future, however, weather and political events will lead to short-term volatility putting stress on budgets e.g. spiking when current weather forecasts are updated, pipeline delivery constraints, extreme weather, fracking

Natural Gas Projection Annual Change

Natural Gas Projection Cumulative Annual Change

Natural Gas + Carbon Risk Policy Federal government introduced carbon tax beginning April 2019 Will result in increase to all fossil fuel costs 2030 consensus that carbon price needs to be US$100/tonne

Natural Gas + Carbon Risk Carbon Tax vs Cap and Trade – Brief Background Ontario had a Cap and Trade program from 2017 to Sept 2018. This market-based system set a price on carbon based on auctions With the cancellation of the Cap and Trade system in the absence of an alternative pricing system for carbon, Ontario is subject to the federal Carbon Tax as of April 2019 A Carbon Tax puts a government-set price on a tonne of GHG emissions. In 2019 that is $20/tonne or about $0.039/m3 natural gas. The federal price will increase by $10/tonne per year to $50 by 2022

Gas + Carbon Projection Carbon price $20/tonne increasing to $130/tonne by 2030 Increases gas cost considerably Annual Change

Gas + Carbon Projection Cumulative Annual Change

Budget Impact Potential For the following slides of board tables, these unit costs were used: 1 excluding carbon cost Unit Cost $ 2019 2025 2030 Electricity 0.176/kWh 0.187/kWh 0.218/kWh Natural Gas1 0.21/m3 0.23/m3 0.27/m3

Budget Impact Potential Small Board Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh) Annual Electricity Cost ($) Annual Natural Gas Consumption (m3) Annual Gas Cost Total Annual Cost 10,000,000 $ 1,760,000 2,000,000 $ 420,000 $ 2,180,000 Year Electricity Cost ($/kWh) Natural Gas Cost ($/m3) Natural Gas + Carbon Cost Annual Electricity Cost ($) Annual Natural Gas Cost Annual Natural Gas + Carbon Cost Total Annual Cost (incl. Carbon) Cost Increase (%) Ratio Elec/Gas Cost 2019 0.18 0.21 0.25 1,757,633 414,600 492,800 2,250,433   4.2 2020 0.20 0.26 398,600 515,900 2,273,533 1% 4.4 2025 0.19 0.23 0.38 1,865,506 449,400 762,200 2,627,706 16% 2030 0.22 0.27 0.53 2,183,547 546,000 1,054,300 3,237,847 23% 4.0

Budget Impact Potential Medium Board Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh) Annual Electricity Cost ($) Annual Natural Gas Consumption (m3) Annual Gas Cost Total Annual Cost 25,000,000 $ 4,400,000 3,000,000 $ 630,000 $ 5,030,000 Year Electricity Cost ($/kWh) Natural Gas Cost ($/m3) Natural Gas + Carbon Cost Annual Electricity Cost ($) Annual Natural Gas Cost Annual Natural Gas + Carbon Cost Total Annual Cost (incl. Carbon) Cost Increase (%) Ratio Elec/Gas Cost 2019 0.18 0.21 0.25 4,394,081 621,900 739,200 5,133,281   7.1 2020 0.20 0.26 597,900 773,850 5,167,931 1% 7.3 2025 0.19 0.23 0.38 4,663,766 674,100 1,143,300 5,807,066 12% 6.9 2030 0.22 0.27 0.53 5,458,868 819,000 1,581,450 7,040,318 21% 6.7

Budget Impact Potential Large Board Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh) Annual Electricity Cost ($) Annual Natural Gas Consumption (m3) Annual Gas Cost Total Annual Cost 50,000,000 $ 8,800,000 10,000,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 10,900,000 Year Electricity Cost ($/kWh) Natural Gas Cost ($/m3) Natural Gas + Carbon Cost Annual Electricity Cost ($) Annual Natural Gas Cost Annual Natural Gas + Carbon Cost Total Annual Cost (incl. Carbon) Cost Increase (%) Ratio Elec/Gas Cost 2019 0.18 0.21 0.25 8,788,163 2,073,000 2,464,000 11,252,163   4.2 2020 0.20 0.26 1,993,000 2,579,500 11,367,663 1% 4.4 2025 0.19 0.23 0.38 9,327,532 2,247,000 3,811,000 13,138,532 16% 2030 0.22 0.27 0.53 10,917,736 2,730,000 5,271,500 16,189,236 23% 4.0

Forewarned is Forearmed Analyze your mix of electricity and gas intensities Scenario 1 Electricity: high Natural gas: low Which leaves you most vulnerable? How should this influence your energy efficient investment decisions? What activities should be prioritized to reduce costs and risks? Intensity Electricity Natural gas

Forewarned is Forearmed Analyze your mix of electricity and gas intensities Scenario 2 Electricity & Natural gas: similar intensity Which leaves you most vulnerable? How should this influence your energy efficient investment decisions? What activities should be prioritized to reduce costs and risks? Intensity Electricity Natural gas

Forewarned is Forearmed Analyze your mix of electricity and gas intensities Scenario 3 Electricity: low Natural gas: high Which leaves you most vulnerable? How should this influence your energy efficient investment decisions? What activities should be prioritized to reduce costs and risks? Intensity Electricity Natural gas

Water Risk Market Most municipalities have recognized that their water service infrastructure is underfunded Electricity costs are also increasing The result is increasing costs for water supply and sewage Rates are expected to increase at around 3 - 8% per year for the next several years for many municipalities e.g. City of Ottawa rates projected to rise 4.4 – 5.2% per year over the next 10 years

Assessing Utility Mix Risks/Exposure Send your questions to the UCD Help Desk Email: ucdb@aegent.ca Phone: (416) 622-9449 ext. 115