11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0237r0 Submission February 12, 2009 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Inputs for a ac Spec Framework Methodology Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0818r0 Submission July 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Padding Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 Submission Pilot Value Definitions March 2012 Seunghee Han, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Date: Authors:
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Doc.:IEEE /1279r0 Submission Nov 09, 2010 Slide 1 Minho Cheong, ETRI Segment Parser for 160MHz Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0824r0 July 2015 Slide 1 Pilot Design for 11ax Downlink Transmissions Date: Authors: Yujin Noh, Newracom.
Doc.: IEEE SubmissionSlide 1 Interleavers for 160MHz Transmission Date: Authors: Mediatek.
Doc.:IEEE /0820r0 Submission July 13, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 MCS Selection and Padding Equations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0819r1 Submission July 2010 Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0079r2 January 2016 Kentaro Taniguchi, ToshibaSlide 1 Allocation sizes for BCC in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1484r4 Submission January 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r2 Submission Pilot Value Definitions May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Support of 1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
MIMO Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
MAX Per BCC Data Rate Date: Authors: Month Year
Waveform Generation for Waveform Coding
80MHz Tone Allocation Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Towards an Improved Proposal Development Process for VHT
VHT Link Adaptations Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Proposed Correction of LDPC Tone Mapping Equation
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
Towards an Improved Proposal Development Process for VHT
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Pilot Value Definitions
Non contiguous additional bandwidth mode
FDMA WUR Generation Date: Authors: May 2018 Month Year
VHT-STF for 11AC Date: Authors: Month Year
MAX Per BCC Data Rate Date: Authors: Month Year
Pilot Sequence for VHT-DATA
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
MIMO Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Pilot Pattern for 120MHz Date: Authors: Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
160MHz Stream Parser Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: Authors: September 2010
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
‘On’ Symbol Generation
256 QAM Mapping Date: Authors: Month Year
Single User MCS Proposal
Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions
EDMG-Header-A contests
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
White Space Regulatory Issues
Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Repetition and interleaver design for MCS0-Rep2
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
256 QAM Mapping Date: Authors: Month Year
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: XX Authors: September 2010
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
Transmit OOB emission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
NGV PHY Performance Results
Omni-directional Multiple Antenna Transmission for WUS
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback Month Year Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback Date: 2010-11-08 Authors: Page 1 John Doe, Some Company John Doe, Some Company

Background (1) TGac decided the VHT Data stream parser being similar as 11n: Consecutive blocks of  s (num of bits on each constellation axis) bits are assigned to different spatial streams in a round robin fashion. If multiple encoders per user are present, the output of each encoder is used alternately in a round robin cycle, i.e., at the beginning S=NSSs bits from the output of first encoder are fed into all spatial streams, and then S bits from the output of the next encoder are used and so on.

Background(2) MCS Exclusion Rule: Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Background(2) MCS Exclusion Rule: In order to avoid extra padding symbols, we will need to ensure that we have an integer number of punctured blocks from all encoders, i.e. both NCBPS/NES and NDBPS/NES are integers. Mathematically we need Sudhir Srinivasa et al. Page 3 John Doe, Some Company

Background (3) Same Stream Parser is also applied to 160MHz: which jointly parses bits of upper and lower 80MHz subbands. Intlv QAM Spatial Map CSD 234 tones Scrambler 512 IFFT Encoder Parser FEC 1 Stream Parser DAC FEC N Frequency Parser HW supporting VHT80

Issues with 160MHz Stream Parser For all 11n MCSs, as well as “allowed” 11ac MCSs in 20/40/80 MHz, each BCC is allocated multiple of S=NSSs coded bits per OFDM Symbol, i.e. NCBPS/NES is an integer (Guaranteed by MCS Exclusion Rule) (NCBPS/NES)/S is also an integer. Parsing/Deparsing are straightforward. In four 160MHz MCSs, (NCBPS/NES)/S is NOT an integer. 234 is multiple of 2 and 3, issues come when NES=5,7; and Nss=NES. Specifically, the following 160MHz MCSs have the issue: 64QAM, Rate 2/3, 5 streams—NES=5 64QAM, Rate 2/3, 7 streams—NES=7 64QAM, Rate 3/4, 5 streams—NES=5 64QAM, Rate 3/4, 7 streams—NES=7 Residue (relative to S=Nss.s) bits at each encoder leads to confusion at Rx. Note that NCBPS/NES are still multiples of s.

Propose to Change the SP Rules for These 4 MCSs Insert the following sentence on stream parser description text (3.2.4.3.1 ): “For 160MHz MCSs, if each BCC encoder does not generate integer blocks of S coded bits in each OFDM symbol, then apply the same stream parsing method until the last integer block (floor(NCBPS/NES/S)) of S bits at each encoder. Assuming that at this point in each OFDM symbol each BCC has M.s (M<NSS) residue bits, take the last M.s bits in the current OFDM symbol from the first encoder and allocate them to the first M spatial streams (s bits to each stream); then take the last M.s bits in the current OFDM symbol from the second encoder and distribute these among M spatial streams, starting from the (M + 1)-th spatial stream, and so on. Note that upon reaching the NSS’th spatial stream, we cycle back to the 1st spatial stream. Repeat till all bits are distributed in the current OFDM symbol.”

Pre-Motion #1 Do you agree to insert the following text into 3.2.4.3.1 (Stream Parser) of the spec framework? “For 160MHz MCSs, if each BCC encoder does not generate integer blocks of S coded bits in each OFDM symbol, then apply the same stream parsing method until the last integer block (floor(NCBPS/NES/S)) of S bits at each encoder. Assuming that at this point in each OFDM symbol each BCC has M.s (M<NSS) residue bits, take the last M.s bits in the current OFDM symbol from the first encoder and allocate them to the first M spatial streams (s bits to each stream); then take the last M.s bits in the current OFDM symbol from the second encoder and distribute these among M spatial streams, starting from the (M + 1)-th spatial stream, and so on. Note that upon reaching the NSS’th spatial stream, we cycle back to the 1st spatial stream. Repeat till all bits are distributed in the current OFDM symbol.” Y N A