Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Advertisements

Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Grounded: Transcriptional Pausing in Naive mESCs
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Large-Scale Analysis Reveals Acquisition of Lineage-Specific Chromosomal Aberrations in Human Adult Stem Cells  Uri Ben-David, Yoav Mayshar, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e5 (October 2018)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
An RNAi Screen of Chromatin Proteins Identifies Tip60-p400 as a Regulator of Embryonic Stem Cell Identity  Thomas G. Fazzio, Jason T. Huff, Barbara Panning 
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Mitotic Bookmarking: Maintaining the Stem Cell Identity during Mitosis
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Mark H. Chin, Matteo Pellegrini, Kathrin Plath, William E. Lowry 
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Erosion of Dosage Compensation Impacts Human iPSC Disease Modeling
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Lab-Specific Gene Expression Signatures in Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Rahul Karnik, Alexander Meissner  Cell Stem Cell 
The 3D Genome in Transcriptional Regulation and Pluripotency
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e3 (March 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 249-257 (August 2010) Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression Programs of Human Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells  Matthew G. Guenther, Garrett M. Frampton, Frank Soldner, Dirk Hockemeyer, Maya Mitalipova, Rudolf Jaenisch, Richard A. Young  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 249-257 (August 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genome-wide Maps of Chromatin Modifications Show Human iPSCs Share Key Features with ESCs (A) Composite H3K4me3 enrichment profile for all RefSeq genes in ESCs (solid blue) and iPSCs (dashed blue). The transcription start site (TSS) and direction of transcription of the average gene is noted by an arrow. (B) ChIP-Seq density heat map of histone H3K4me3 (blue) for all RefSeq genes. Gene order was determined by highest average ChIP-Seq density in ESCs and arranged from highest to lowest density. The TSS and direction of transcription of genes is indicated by an arrow and the genomic region from –4.5kb to +4.5kb relative to the TSS shown. (C) Composite H3K27me3 enrichment profile for all RefSeq genes enriched for H3K27me3 in ESCs (solid green) and iPSCs (dashed green). The TSS and direction of transcription of the average gene is noted by an arrow. (D) ChIP-Seq density heat map of histone H3K27me3 (green) for all RefSeq genes. Gene order was determined by highest average ChIP-Seq density in ESCs and arranged from highest to lowest density. The TSS and direction of transcription of genes is indicated by an arrow and the genomic region from –4.5kb to +4.5kb relative to the TSS shown. (E) ChIP-Seq density for H3K4me3 (blue) at the OCT4 locus in human ESC, iPSC, and fibroblast cell lines. The position of the loci within chromosome 6 and the scale is shown above the gene tracks. (F) ChIP-Seq density for H3K27me3 (green) in the HOXA cluster in human ESC, iPSC, and fibroblast cell lines. The position of the cluster within chromosome 7 and the scale is shown above the gene tracks. See also Tables S1–S4. Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 249-257DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Similarity in Genes and Regions Occupied by Modified Histones in ESCs and iPSCs (A) Pairwise comparisons of genes occupied by H3K4me3 in ESCs, iPSCs, and fibroblast cells. Each blue bar represents an individual pairwise comparison of the set of genes identified as enriched in one cell line with the set enriched in a second cell line. Comparisons between two ESC lines (ESC versus ESC), between two iPS lines (iPSC versus iPSC), between an ESC line and an iPSC line (ESC versus iPSC), and between an ESC or iPSC line and fibroblast cells (ESC/iPSC versus fibroblast) are shown in separate columns. Gene occupancy was determined as described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. (B) Pairwise comparisons of genes occupied by H3K27me3 in ESCs, iPSCs, and fibroblast cells. Each green bar represents an individual pairwise comparison of the set of genes identified as enriched in one cell line with the set enriched in a second cell line as in (A). (C) Expression data for genes differentially occupied by H3K4me3 in pluripotent cells (ESCs and iPSCs) and fibroblast cells. Genes are ordered by the magnitude of differential H3K4me3 occupancy and relative gene expression is shown. Samples with higher than average expression are shown in red and samples with lower than average expression are shown in green (scale in standard deviations). (D) Expression data for genes differentially occupied by H3K27me3 in pluripotent cells (ESCs and iPSCs) and fibroblast cells. Genes are ordered by the magnitude of differential H3K27me3 occupancy and relative gene expression is shown. Samples with higher than average expression are shown in red and samples with lower than average expression are shown in green (scale in standard deviations). See also Figure S1 and Tables S1–S4. Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 249-257DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Limited Variation in Gene Expression between Human ESCs and iPSCs (A) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of whole genome expression data from ESCs (closed circle), iPSCs (open circle), and fibroblasts (hashed circle). Expression data was ordered by the magnitude of differential expression between pluripotent cells (ESCs or iPSCs) and fibroblast cells. Normalization and analysis for all expression data is described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. (B) Differential gene expression between ESCs and iPSCs across multiple expression data sets. For each data set (top to bottom) the transcripts with statistically significant differential expression between ESCs and iPSCs are shown. Within the set of differentially expressed transcripts from each data set, expression data was ordered by the statistical significance of differential expression between ESCs and iPSCs and then aligned to all other data sets for comparison. Samples with higher than average expression are shown in red and samples with lower than average expression are shown in green (scale in standard deviations). (C) Differential gene expression between fibroblasts and pluripotent cells (ESCs and iPSCs). Expression data were ordered by the statistical significance of differential expression between fibroblasts and ESCs/iPSCs in each data set and then aligned to all other data sets for comparison. Samples with higher than average expression are shown in red and samples with lower than average expression are shown in green (scale in standard deviations). (D) Overlap of differentially expressed genes between ESCs and iPSCs in various expression data sets. The numbers of genes differentially expressed between ESCs and iPSCs are indicated in black. The total overlap of all gene sets is zero. (E) Overlap of differentially expressed genes between fibroblast and pluripotent cells (ESCs and iPSCs) in various expression data sets. The numbers of genes differentially expressed between fibroblast and pluripotent cells are indicated in black. The total overlap of all gene sets is shown in white. See also Figure S2 and Table S5. Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 249-257DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Human ESC and iPSC Expression Data Clusters More by Laboratory than by ESC/iPSC Identity Gene expression data sets for human ESCs, iPSCs, and fibroblast cells from four laboratories (Guenther et al., present study; Maherali et al., 2008; Chin et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2009) were quantile normalized as one group. Genes were Z score normalized and data were subjected to hierarchical clustering (centered correlation distance, centroid linkage) of samples. Genes were ordered from greatest to least magnitude of differential expression between pluripotent and fibroblast cells. Solid circles indicate ESC samples, empty circles indicate iPSC samples, and hashed circles represent fibroblast cell samples. Data from individual labs are coded by color as Guenther et al. (blue), Maherali et al. (red), Chin et al. (purple), and Yu et al. (green). See also Table S5. Cell Stem Cell 2010 7, 249-257DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions