LIGO-G060224-00-M May 17, 2006 Installation (INS) Requirements and Design Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Dennis Coyne, Caltech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Advertisements

Antti Piirto The first EPR under Construction in Finland International Nuclear Forum 2008 ”Bulgarian Nuclear Energy – National, Regional and.
Software change management
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
Testing Workflow Purpose
Project Management CHAPTER SIXTEEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
25 seconds left…...
©Ian Sommerville 1995/2000 (Modified by Spiros Mancoridis 1999) Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapters 1,3 Slide 1 Software Engineering Software Engineering.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G A-M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Optical Layout Cavity Lengths Input Mode Cleaner (IMC) »IMC FSR = ~9 MHz »Length = ~16.6 m = ~HAM1 to HAM3 separation.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G W Raab: Searching for Gravitational Waves w/ LIGO1 Why Has Duty Cycle Been Lower in Livingston.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Schedule »through R&D, including near-term plans »project.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish LSC Meeting 19-Aug-02.
LIGO-G06xxxx-00-M Technical Progress Planned/Needed in FY07 Advanced LIGO Program Advisory Panel meeting, 30 November – 1 December 2006, MIT Dennis Coyne,
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Facilities Modifications (FAC) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
LIGO-G M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Assembly & Installation Plan 14 Oct 2004 Dennis Coyne.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
Livingston 16 th August 2006 LIGO-G E HAM SAS Passive Seismic Attenuation System Fabrication, Assembly, Installation Ben Abbott, Valerio Boschi,
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
E v3 aLIGO SEI Testing and Commissioning Overall Plan
G M 1 HAM-SAS CCB information 22 Feb 06 Coyne, Shoemaker, Wilkinson.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
LIGO- G050xxx -00-D Advanced LIGO SUS Installation into BSC Chambers: Mechanical Fixtures Dennis Coyne (with input from many) G May 4 th 2005.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
LSC Meeting March ‘07 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) LASTI Progress and Plans LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway/Richard Mittleman March.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Data Acquisition, Diagnostics & Controls (DAQ)
LIGO LAB R&D PROGRAM TECHNICAL REVIEW, OCT 02
Prospects and plans : LIGO interferometers Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory LSC meeting, MIT Nov 4-5, 2006.
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M May 17, 2006 Installation (INS) Requirements and Design Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Dennis Coyne, Caltech

LIGO-G M May 17, Installation (INS) WBS Functions INS is the project phase between subsystem assembly & project completion Includes: Removal » Removal of existing detector equipment » Disposition or storage of equipment » Particulate clean up of vacuum chambers Installation » Installation of Vacuum Equipment » Installation of all Detector Equipment –External to vacuum system –Internal to vacuum system Testing » In-situ Unit/subsystem Testing » Integrated System-Level Testing Does not include: Installation Planning (FMP scope) Installation Staging (FMP scope) Assembly (subsystem scope) Unit Acceptance testing (subsystem scope) Installation Fixtures (subsystem & FMP scope) Commissioning (beyond project scope) Data & Computing System (DCS) installation & test

LIGO-G M May 17, Basic Strategy Start with Livingston (L1) to minimize impact of initial problem discovery » Unless world-wide gravitational network status sets other priorities LIGO manages all INS activities » No subcontracted effort » Skilled trade labor all directed by LIGO staff Prior to INS start: » All production/fabrication and assembly are completed (reduce labor distraction and delays from late deliveries) » Integrated Testing & Training at LASTI Lab & 40m Lab –Pre-Stabilized Laser + Input Optics + Data Acquisition/Networking (PSL+IO+DAQ) –Seismic Isolation System + Suspension Assemblies + partial Interferometer Sensing & Control + Data Acquisition/Networking (SEI+SUS+~ISC+~DAQ)

LIGO-G M May 17, INS Procedure Development & Training at the MIT LASTI Facility Large Full-Scale Prototype Assemblies are Installed & Tested in the LASTI Facility Chambers Mode Cleaner, Triple Suspension Installation in a HAM Chamber at LASTI Quadruple Suspension Installation on Temporary Optics Table at LASTI Internal Seismic Isolation (ISI) Assembly at LASTI (to be installed in BSC Chamber in 2006)

LIGO-G M May 17, Basic Strategy (continued) After INS Start: » Simultaneous installation at both observatories (optimum staff utilization) » Time phased installation of subsystems (leveling load on experts) –Sufficient to transfer/re-direct expertise to support 2 nd observatory installation –Insufficient time to rework – rely upon subsystem/subassembly testing and LASTI system testing » Significant participation & support from observatory staff (training) » Installation & Integrated Testing are parallel activities –emphasis on early discovery of problems at integrated systems level –emphasis on installation of in-vacuum components ASAP

LIGO-G M May 17, Installation Readiness Installation Readiness Review to be held prior to switching off an Operating Observatory Litmus Test for Readiness: » Agreement between LSC & LIGO Lab that switching off a working LIGO interferometer will not cripple the world-wide network of gravitational wave observatories » All Installation Procedures Approved –Note that many procedures developed for Initial LIGO are common to AdL » Critical Installation Activities & Tooling have been Tested (LASTI testbed) » Sufficient assembly, check-out and delivery of subsystem components completed, so that installation will not be supply chain limited

LIGO-G M May 17, Seismic Isolation, HEPI Subsystem Installation at LIGO Livingston Observatory Helical Spring (1 of 2) Vertical Actuator Horizontal Actuator Crossbeam Pier Coarse & Fine (PEPI) Actuation Systems HEPI

LIGO-G M May 17, INS Organization & Team Composition Organization: » Centralized, flat organization » Program Manager directs INS effort » Separate on-site management for Installation and Integrated System Test Teams: » Subsystem focused » Installation teams comprised of the subsystem staff (designed & fabricated the hardware) » Plus observatory staff (assembled & tested the hardware) » Plus hired temporary (contract) staff (particularly skilled trade labor and technicians) as needed

LIGO-G M May 17, INS Basic Tasks/Sequence for a single Interferometer

LIGO-G M May 17, LHO LVEA STAGING/STORING AREAS PSL OUTER & INNER ENCLOSURES LARGE ITEM ACCESS ROUTE ELECTRONICS RACK ENCLOSURE FOR THE FOLDED INTERFEROMETER ISC TABLE ASSY AREA SEI & SUS CLEAN ROOM CARTRIDGE ASSY AREA BSC & HAM SEI ASSY. IN CRATES SUS ASSY. IN CRATES HEPI PUMP STATION AREA

LIGO-G M May 17, End Station Revise to show cartridge assembly clean room BSC CHAMBER RELOCATED FROM MID- STATION STAGING AREAS

LIGO-G M May 17, BSC Cartridge Installation on Test Stand overhead crane Clean room Clean cover frame SEI BSC SUS quad (without structure shown) In general the entire BSC optics table payload and all counterbalance mass is installed as part of the cartridge Quadruple Suspension Installation on Temporary Optics Table at LASTI

LIGO-G M May 17, BSC Cartridge Insertion into BSC Chamber

LIGO-G M May 17, Installation/Integration Challenges Subsystem deliveries may be late » Readiness Review to decide whether to start or delay Safety » Tight procedures & training (as was done in Initial LIGO) » Light Source Physically locked within PSL Enclosure during most of the Installation effort » Strict adherence to Safety Plan Timely Transfer of Lessons Learned from 1 st Interferometer to 2 nd & 3 rd » Staggered Starts (9 months) » Common management & key staff Quality Assurance » In-situ Subsystem Testing for acceptance is mandatory

LIGO-G M May 17, Approach to Establishing the Basis Of Estimate Costs » Bottom-up: –Labor mix and hours based on team composition per task times expected task duration and times needed duty cycle for labor skills » Top-Down: –Compare to Initial LIGO Travel Cost during Installation & Integrated Test –Compare to Initial LIGO Labor Costs during Installation & Integrated Test –Justify differences Schedule » Engineering judgment/estimate of major phase durations based on Initial LIGO experience » Compare to Initial LIGO duration

LIGO-G M May 17, Initial LIGO Time Line Installation, Integration/Testing, Commissioning & Running NowInauguration E2 Engineering E3 E5 E9E10 E7 E8 E11 First LockFull Lock all IFO First Science Data S1 S4 Science S2 Runs S3S K strain noiseat 150 Hz [Hz -1/2 ] 4x AdL Project (MREFC) Scope 2.7 years duration Started install 7/98