Outcomes of symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Randall R. De Martino, MD, Brian W. Nolan, MD, Philip P. Goodney, MD, Catherine K. Chang, MD, Andres Schanzer, MD, Robert Cambria, MD, Daniel J. Bertges, MD, Jack L. Cronenwett, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 5-12.e1 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.095 Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Comparison of in-hospital mortality is shown for all abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs stratified by urgency and endovascular or open method of repair. P value from F-test; <.05 considered significant. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 52, 5-12.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.095) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Comparison of major adverse event rates (MAE), defined as myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, worse renal function, respiratory compromise, or bowel ischemia, is shown stratified by urgency and endovascular or open method of repair. P value from F-test, <.05 considered significant. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 52, 5-12.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.095) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Long-term survival is shown stratified by urgency of repair (P < .001, log-rank between each group; standard error <10% for all time points shown). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 52, 5-12.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.095) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions