July 11, 2006 / 3p Phase IV Projection Emission Inventories

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory FEJF Meeting September 8 – 9, 2004 Worley, ID – Coeur D’Alene Casino Resort Hotel Dave Randall ( x221;
Advertisements

Fire Modeling Protocol MeetingBoise, IDAugust 31 – September 1, 2010 Applying Fire Emission Inventories in Chemical Transport Models Zac Adelman
NGSS Town Hall Meeting October 1, a.m. - Noon Hall of Flags Houston Hall.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
WRAP 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting February 9-10, 2005 – Round Rock, TX Dave Randall.
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
5/29/2007SE TSP Launch1 Team Software Project (TSP) May 29, 2007 Launch/Strategy Team Formation.
Software Compliance: Are we there yet? Looking back and moving forward.
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System January 2004 WRAP Technical Summit Phoenix, Arizona E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.
Condor Technology Solutions, Inc. Grace RFTS Application Extension Phase.
1 July 12, 2006/10a Fire Emissions Tracking System White Paper Fire Emissions Joint Forum July 11-12, 2006 Portland, OR Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc.
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System Presentation to Fire Emissions Joint Forum Las Vegas, Nevada December 09, 2004 E.H.
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
CDM Project Developers Workshop.  Boundaries & Leakage  Calculating emissions reductions  Any other issues Session II.
IBM Software Group IBM Software Group Rational software ®® SCMA45 Building a Distributed Release Process Using IBM Rational ClearCase, IBM Rational ClearDDTS.
WRAP/FEJF Inter RPO Report WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (c)
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Use of Photochemical Grid Modeling to Quantify Ozone Impacts from Fires in Support of Exceptional Event Demonstrations STI-5704 Kenneth Craig, Daniel Alrick,
WRAP/FEJF Phase III/IV Emissions Inventory Project WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (a)
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 1:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Technical Refinements Large Fires Complex Identification Duplicates -- WF and Rx Fire QC Packets States,
Integration Issues for RTF Guidelines: Savings, Lifetimes and Cost/Benefit October 24, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker, SBW.
2002 FIRE INVENTORY VISTAS States – First Draft Oct 2003 National RPO meeting Nov 5, 2003.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Fire Plume Rise WRAP (FEJF) Method vs. SMOKE.
§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
November 2, 2005 (Afternoon Revision) San Diego, California1.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 Rangeland Burning (Non-Federal Lands) Methodology Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Calculation Tool for Estimating Projected Emissions - Methods Roll Out – (Day 2 – ) Phase III/IV Project.
12/14/20151 Fire Emissions Tracking System Development & Implementation Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies Biogenics, Ammonia,
September 28, 2005Ph III/IV Project Team1 Phase III/IV Planning EIs Update and Status Report.
Introduction Session (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2, 2005 – San Diego, CA.
1 UPDATE ON EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR AGRICULTURAL BURNING AND WILDLAND FIRE - ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SUMMARY TABLE JUNE 3 - 4, 2003 MACTEC.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 National Inventory Format NIF3 Methodology & Visual Display Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
1/13/20161 FETS: State of the System Providers, Features, Lessons Learned August 31, 2009 FETS Project Meeting Boise, ID.
Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development Day 1 – 2:45p Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
WRAP SCC Temporal and Speciation Profile Improvement Project Status WRAP Regional Modeling Center Carolina Environmental Program November 4, 2003.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Technical & Policy Products Overview June 16, 2004 Portland, OR.
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
September 28, 2005Missoula, Montana1 Inter-RPO 2002 National Wildfire Emission Inventory - Results - by Air Sciences Inc. and EC/R, Inc. for the Inter-RPO.
November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Strawman Projection Activity Targets (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2,
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, & Dust Emissions of Carbon from Fire Fire Emissions Joint Forum Presented by – Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc. May 23, 2006.
1 Fire Emissions Inventories (almost) Closeout -- Ph IV Projections – Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA Day 1 – 1015a part A Dave Randall.
Incorporating Smoke Management Plans into Regional Haze SIPs (Arizona Perspective) Smoke Management Planning Workshop WRAP 308 Planning Committee & Fire.
MANE-VU 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Megan Schuster Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting Austin, TX February 2005.
Intermountain West Data Warehouse - Western Air Quality Study
ICT Technical Documentation and Flow Chart
Growth and Control for LADCO Round2 Modeling
Archiving and Document Transfer Utilities
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Training Session Fire Emissions Tracking System
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Western Regional Haze Planning and
IMPROVE Data Processing
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Phase 2 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Emissions reduction techniques (ERTs) Whither FEJF?
Inter-RPO 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
FEJF Meeting Day 1, 845a – Seattle, WA
Fire Emissions and Smoke Management Plans
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
Smoke Management in Alaska
Emissions Reduction Techniques (ERTs)
Presentation transcript:

July 11, 2006 / 3p Phase IV Projection Emission Inventories Fire Emissions Joint Forum July 11-12, 2006 Portland, OR Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc.

Phases of Fire EIs Phase II (historical 2002) Baseline (Phase III) (nominal 2000-2004) Projections (Phase IV) (nominal 2018) Activity Scenarios for each fire type Less Likely More Note: The PLANNING inventories (Phase III & IV) are unique EI’s…unique from each other AND unique from Phase II

2018 Projection Activity Scalars Fire-type Less Likely More Wildfire 0.9 x (WF base + WFU base) 0.5 x (WF base + WFU base) WFU 0.1 x (WFU base + WF base) 0.5 x (WFU base + WF base) 1.0 x (WFU base + WF base) Rx Agency 0.25 x IFC 0.5 x IFC Interagency Fuels Committee activity targets Rx S/P/O 1.0 x Baseline 2.0 x Baseline 3.0 x Baseline Ag Baseline – (SJV & WA Orchard Removal) NFR NRCS 2018 estimate

Anticipated 2018 Activity Levels (Acres) Fire-type Less Likely More WF + WFU 4.7 MM 7.0 MM Rx (broadcast + piles) 1.0 MM 2.0 MM 3.7 MM Ag 1.7 MM NFR 1.3 MM

Air Quality Planning Fire EI Suites

Rounding Deviation from Scalars and Activity Targets Multiplying a baseline level times its scalar arrived at an activity target in acres. By design, the Calc Tool pulls fire-days (with their complete acres and emissions) up to this activity target. For every jurisdiction in the calc tool, the event-based projection EI will therefore deviate from the activity targets. Can be thought of as a “rounding error.”

Rounding Deviation Statistics Assessed deviation by-state or by-agency or by-burn type for all fire types and scenarios. Did not attempt to hit each Rx state-agency-burn type combination. Average deviation of 2.6% for all 124 scalars needed for 2018 projections suites. 10 projections were over 10%. These had fewer than 100,000 acres as the projection target so could be affected by a large fire in seed data.

Detailed Results and Calc Tool Methods

ERT APPLICATION RULES Implementation Regulatory Will of the Agencies - % of Controllable Acres to which ERT’s are applied Emission reductions due to ERTs Technical Implementation Entire EI Controllable Portion of the EI Rx Events ANTH Portion of Rx Events AGGRESSIVE FOR EACH EVENT TO WHICH ERT’s ARE APPLIED: ANTH Events Subject to ERT Rules ANTH Events to which ERT’s are applied (a fnc. of Freq of Use of the ERT in the sub-region EMISSIONS X (1-ERF) LIKELY ANTH Portion of Rx Events ANTH Events to which ERT’s are applied LEAST AGGRESSIVE ANTH Portion of Rx Events ANTH Events to which ERT’s are applied

Basic Steps to Run the Calc Tool

Calc Tool Prototype as Excel Workbook

Load Seed Data (WRAP Baseline)

2- Tool calculates number of new events/acres needed 1- User enters scalars 2- Tool calculates number of new events/acres needed 3- Hit “Go” and events are “looked up” from randomized Source sheet into New Events sheet

Post Processing Apply ERTs after Calc Tool selection (Will be integrated into Calc Tool.) ERT Seasonal Suites for lookup table being finished after yesterdays’ Strawman Session. Combine output into single 250,000 record all-scenario database for graphing & QA. Format into SMOKE and NIF files.

Significant Features of 2018 Projection Calc Tool

Significant Features – Software Architecture Software design strategy of “seed data” versus programming code to create new EI Customize historic data to have appropriate seed events for desired projection EI. Leave Calc Tool code to only choose events up to activity targets, not modify events per se. Benefit: User can alter event data to suite EI planning rather than reworking code. Pre-processing seed data Random sort of events so new EI doesn’t have undesirable patterns in events. (For instance an 0.5 scalar pulls events only from counties A – M because of original order.) Hand remove or flag ineligible events: Certain large Rx fires were causing big rounding errors in jurisdictions with small targets. Flag a realistic size limit for WFU events in WF pool.

Significant Features – Rx Stem Cell Events Creating fire events for 2018 where none existed in historic data (aka “stem cell events”) Scalars and IFC activity targets resulted in 2018 Rx activity projected for state-agency-burn type combinations which did not exist in 2002/baseline seed data. For only those instances, prototype prescribed burns were created outside the calc tool and augmented into seed data. 50 acre broadcast burns and 25 acre pile burns dropped on every 12-km grid cell per agency land where needed. Fuel loading (at centroid), lat/lon, and random date assigned to event (piles: April or November; broadcast: April or October). Benefit: Reasonable size and date with site-specific fuel loading satisfies this unexpected gap filling. Compatible with cloning.

Significant Features – Event Management Cloning events Rx events are re-used to create more activity. WF events are re-used to achieve WFU targets. “Data inbreeding” mitigated by adjusting date +/- 7 days and assuming event occurs elsewhere in same model grid cell. Benefit: Create additional realistic model-ready activity for 2018 while not simply scattering events or scaling up emissions in existing events. Handling multi-day events and smoldering records Random sort of seed events does preserve fire-day order and smolder record pairing. Benefit: Entire events are pulled into new EI.

Next Steps Deliver formatted output files from Phase IV Calc Tools and group into modeling suites – files ready for posting . Deliver Draft documentation for Phase III/IV Task Team Review – draft document should be posted within a week. Incorporate comments and deliver Phase III/IV Final documentation.