B DK strategies in LHCb (part II)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Advertisements

Feasibility of sin  Measurement From Time Distribution of B 0  DK S Decay Vivek Sharma University of California San Diego.
1/15 Sensitivity to  with B  D(KK  )K Decays CP Working Group Meeting - Thursday, 19 th April 2007 Introduction B  DK  Dalitz Analysis Summary.
CP Violation Reach at Very High Luminosity B Factories Abi Soffer Snowmass 2001 Outline: Ambiguities B  DK B  D*     etc. B  D*  a 0   etc. (“designer.
24/08/2005LHCb UK Meeting, Dublin1 First steps toward γ from B + →D 0 (K 0 π + π - )K + with Tom Barber, Val Gibson, Cristina Lazzeroni and Jim Libby.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
A. BondarModel-independent φ 3 measurement August 6, 2007Charm 2007, Cornell University1/15 γ/φ 3 model-independent Dalitz analysis (Dalitz+CP tagged Dalitz.
1/4/2008 LHCb Tuesday Meeting 1 Global fits to γ and the impact of CLEO-c Jim Libby and Guy Wilkinson (University of Oxford)
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Aug 6, Charm γ/φ 3 Impact from CLEO-c Using CP-Tagged D→K S,L ππ Decays Eric White - University of Illinois Qing He - University of Rochester for.
19th July 2007CPWG1 Model independent determination of γ from B ± →D(K 0 S π + π − )K ± Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
Beauty 06, Oxford, 27 Sept Marco Zito1 Measurements of gamma using ADS, GLW and other methods & future projections Marco Zito CEA-Saclay, Dapnia-SPP.
7th February Determination of γ from B ± →DK ± : Input from CLEOc Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
LHCb Strategies for  from B→DK Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh for the LHCb Collaboration ADS with B + →DK + and B 0 → DK* 0 Dalitz with B + →DK +
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
8th December 2007CLEO physics fest1 Coherence factor analyses Jim Libby, Andrew Powell and Guy Wilkinson (University of Oxford)
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
B→DK strategies in LHCb (Part I) Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 6 th February 2006 FLAVOUR IN THE ERA OF THE LHC.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
30th October 2007 LHCb Tuesday Meeting 1 Model independent determination of γ from B ± →D(K 0 S π + π − )K ± Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Quantum-correlated D-decays at CLEO-c
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Reaching for  (present and future)
Search for b → u transitions in B+ → {Kpp0}DK+
LHCb prospects in flavour physics and CP violation
WGV Summary g from B to charm decays
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Max Baak, NIKHEF on behalf of the BABAR and BELLE Collaborations
ВД в эксперименте по измерению масс
Measurements of g and sin(2b+g ) in BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
BESIII 粲介子的强子衰变 周晓康 中国科学技术大学 BESIII 粲介(重)子物理研讨会.
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Hadronic Substructure & Dalitz Analyses at CLEO
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy and Decays using the Belle Detector
LHCb Strategies for g from B→DK
How charm data may help for φ3 measurement at B-factories
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
γ/φ3 determination with B D0(*)K(*) Dalitz analysis
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
f3 measurements by Belle
Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Study of the suppressed decay B-DK- and B-D(*)CPK- decays at Belle
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
Measurement of f3 using Dalitz plot analysis of B+ D(*)K(*)+ by Belle
Presentation transcript:

B DK strategies in LHCb (part II) Cristina Lazzeroni (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Introduction Decays of B to D0(D0)K involve b c and b u transitions - sensitive to g if a common final state is studied for both D0 and D0 LHCb will exploit a number of strategies to study such decays : Gronau-London-Wyler-(Dunietz) ('GLW') B0and B0 decays Atwood-Dunietz-Soni ('ADS') B± decays (see M.Patel talk yesterday) Dalitz B0/B0 and B± decays In this talk will focus on Dalitz and GLW The Dalitz analysis is sensitive to the same parameters as ADS, two methods are complementary 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

B+  D0K+ g is the weak phase between b  cus ( Vcb) and b  ucs ( Vub) g can be extracted from the interference of these two processes in charged BD0K decays with D0/D0 decaying to a common final state rB is the relative colour and CKM suppression between the two modes O(0.1) – dilutes sensitivity to g d is the strong phase difference - invariant under CP No need for a time-dependent analysis 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Measuring g : B+  D0(K0π+π-)K+ Giri, Grossman, Soffer, Zupan (PRD 68, 054018 (2003)) Use three body Cabibbo allowed decays of the D0/D0 BR(D0  K0π+π-)=(5.97±0.35)% BR(D0  K* p)=(3.9±0.3)%, BR(D0  Ks r)=(1.55+0.12)%… Large strong phases between the intermediate resonances allow the extraction of rB , d and g by studying the Dalitz distribution of events -0.16 where 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Dalitz model B-factories use samples of O(100k) D+*  D0π+, DCS K*(892) ρ(770) B-factories use samples of O(100k) D+*  D0π+, D0  K0π+π- to measure amplitudes and phases - vary model to estimate systematics At present not negligible error from model r 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Dalitz model B factories consider 16 resonances + non resonant component At present dominant systematic error of 11o from model uncertainties Scope for improvement: Alternative fit to Dalitz plane with full partial wave analysis of non-resonant component CLEO-C and B factories will improve statistics to measure the Dalitz plot Use model independent binned technique - loss of statistical power CLEO-C correlated data could be used directly in a model independent binned treatment 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Measuring g from B-factories hep-ex/0507101 B+ B- D* and D combined Babar: g = 67°±28°±13°±11° rB= 0.05±0.11 Exp. systematic Dalitz Model error s() vs rB Belle: PRD 70, 072003 (2004) g = 68°±14°±13°±11° rB= 0.21±0.08 At present typical event yields / experiment ~ 300 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

B+  D0(K0π+π-)K+ : Dalitz plot m- LHCb generator studies Regions of the Dalitz plot with the largest interference are most sensitive to g Need good understanding of Dalitz amplitudes Use isobar model from Belle/Babar with: B simulated with g=64.7o, d=150o, rb=0.16 D0/D0 r(770) Breit-Wigner + non-resonant K* and DCS K* m+ 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Acceptance studies Selection tuned to maximise signal-to-background ratio Acceptance studied with phase space MC - flat within statistics % m- % m- m+ m+ Acceptance evaluation with isobar model in progress - first indication suggests it is similar 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Dalitz: High Level Trigger selection In the present preliminary High Level Trigger algorithm tracks decaying downstream of the VELO are not used 70% of the events in the present offline Dalitz selection would not be reconstructed Work is therefore needed to extend the trigger to include these tracks 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Background studies At present no background found in 50 MeV mass window of equivalent 46 x 106 inclusive B and 80 x 106 minimum bias Still limited background statistics, equivalent to a few minutes of LHCb running Use B mass sidebands 10 times larger than standard, to study possible sources of background In enlarged sidebands 4 bb events are found 1 partially reconstructed b, 3 b-combinatorics - worth further investigation Contribution in low-mass sidebands from tails of B0  D0(K0π+π-)K*0 and from B+  D*0 K+ - under investigation 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Annual yield: B+  D0(K0π+π-)K+ Acceptance studied with phase space MC etot = 0.10% (selection + L0L1 trigger = 5.8%) Luminosity = 2 fb-1 BR(B+  D0(Ksπ+π-)K+)= 7.5 x 10-6 Expected ~6000 events/year not including High Level Trigger efficiency (or > 1300 including it) 0.5< B/S < 3.2 @ 90%CL s(D)~7 MeV s(B)~15 MeV 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

B+  D0(K0K+K-)K+ BR(D0  K0K+K-) =(1.03±0.10)% Same method works for D0  K0K+K- decay Reduced BR: BR(D0  K0K+K-) =(1.03±0.10)% But less background because two more particle identification constraints from RICH should substantially reduce background - also narrow phase space Acceptance evaluation in progress Dalitz model has fewer resonances (, a0) but complex threshold effects (Babar hep-ex/0507026) Separate study of sensitivity is necessary 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

GLW method - g from B0  D0K*0 Dunietz variant of Gronau-Wyler method makes use of interference between two colour-suppressed diagrams interfering via D0 mixing : Measuring the 6 decay rates B0 D0(Kp,pK,KK)K*0 + CP conjugates allows g to be extracted without flavour tagging or proper time determination A1 = A(B0  D0K*0): bc transition, phase 0 A2 = A(B0  D0K*0): bu transition, phase + A3 = 2 A(B0  DCPK*0) = A1+A2, because DCP=(D0+D0)/2 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

GLW method - g from B0  D0K*0 LHCb expectations for 2 fb–1 (g=65o, D=0) :  () ~ 8 in one year Work ongoing to understand biases introduced by DCS amplitude in D->Kp Properly including this will be equivalent to full ADS treatment of B0 ->DK Mode (+ cc) Yield S/Bbb (90%CL) B0  D0 (K+p-) K*0 3.4k > 2 B0  D0 (K-p+) K*0 0.5k > 0.3 B0  D0CP (K+K-) K*0 0.6k 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Dalitz: B0  D0(K0 π +π-) K*0 (K+ π-) Same method works as in charged B BF Reduced by factor 10: BF(B0  D0(K0 π +π-)K*0) with K*0 K+π- = 6.4x 10-7 Higher interference (rb~1) Dalitz model imported from Belle; amplitudes and phases of resonances taken from CLEO (hep-ex/0207067) PDG ‘04 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Acceptance studies Large statistical error, more detailed study in progress Expected yield < 0.1 B+ yield because of order of magnitude lower branching ratio and additional charged particle Acceptance after trigger (no HLT) Acceptance after trigger and analysis cuts Error on acceptance Error on acceptance 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

B± Conclusions ADS method (from M.Patel talk): Candidate for LHCb’s most precise measurement of g Expected annual signal yields (Luminosity = 2 fb-1 ) : D(Kp)K - favoured ~ 60k B/S ~ 0.5 suppressed ~ 2k B/S ~ 0.5 D(KK)K …? D(Kppp)K With our present understanding of the background a precision on g of ~5o looks feasible with 2fb-1 of data Dalitz method: Expected annual signal yield ~6000 without High Level Trigger efficiency ( to be compared to ~300 at B-factories) 0.5 < B/S < 3.2 @90% CL Result on the sensitivity to g will be available within the time scale of this workshop 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

B0 Conclusions GLW method: Expected annual signal yields (Luminosity = 2 fb-1 ) : D(K+p-)K*0 ~ 2.4k B/S >2 D(K-p+)K*0 ~ 0.5k B/S>0.3 D0CP(K+K-)K*0 ~0.6k B/S>0.3 s(g)~8o in one year Work ongoing to understand biases introduced by DCS amplitude in D->Kp Dalitz method: Expected annual signal yield < 600 due to BR 10 times lower than the charged one and the presence of one more final state particle Background rejection under investigation Sensitivity to g in progress 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Outlook Possibility of including the KS decaying outside the Vertex Detector in the High Level Trigger Dalitz model: Refinement of the Dalitz model Model-independent technique Measure the resonance parameters ourselves Detailed studies of the acceptance over the Dalitz plot Further background investigation More results soon on the sensitivity to g rB and dB are the same for all charged (neutral) channels  global fit LHCb has a great potential to measure g in a wide variety of channels! 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

Spares 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop

M(Kp ) M(Kp) M(pp) m- m+ 07/02/2006 LHC Flavour workshop