Introduction to Proofs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
With examples from Number Theory
Advertisements

Discrete Math Methods of proof 1.
Introduction to Proofs
Proofs, Recursion and Analysis of Algorithms Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 2 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS SlidesProofs,
Logic and Proof. Argument An argument is a sequence of statements. All statements but the first one are called assumptions or hypothesis. The final statement.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/31/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/11
So far we have learned about:
Copyright © Zeph Grunschlag,
1 Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition.
Proofs, Recursion and Analysis of Algorithms Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 2.1 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS SlidesProofs,
Introduction to Proofs ch. 1.6, pg. 87,93 Muhammad Arief download dari
Fall 2002CMSC Discrete Structures1 Let’s proceed to… Mathematical Reasoning.
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
Introduction to Proofs
Introduction to Proofs
1 Georgia Tech, IIC, GVU, 2006 MAGIC Lab Rossignac Lecture 03: PROOFS Section 1.5 Jarek Rossignac CS1050: Understanding.
1 Methods of Proof CS/APMA 202 Epp, chapter 3 Aaron Bloomfield.
CS 103 Discrete Structures Lecture 07b
10/17/2015 Prepared by Dr.Saad Alabbad1 CS100 : Discrete Structures Proof Techniques(1) Dr.Saad Alabbad Department of Computer Science
1 Sections 1.5 & 3.1 Methods of Proof / Proof Strategy.
1 Math/CSE 1019C: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Fall 2011 Suprakash Datta Office: CSEB 3043 Phone: ext
Discrete Structures (DS)
Chap 3 –A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true –A proof is a sequence of statements to show that a theorem is true –Axioms: statements which.
Section 3.3: Mathematical Induction Mathematical induction is a proof technique that can be used to prove theorems of the form:  n  Z +,P(n) We have.
Fall 2008/2009 I. Arwa Linjawi & I. Asma’a Ashenkity 11 The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Introduction to Proofs.
1 Discrete Structures – CNS2300 Text Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Kenneth H. Rosen (5 th Edition) Chapter 3 The Foundations: Logic and Proof,
Method of proofs.  Consider the statements: “Humans have two eyes”  It implies the “universal quantification”  If a is a Human then a has two eyes.
Module #1 - Logic Based on Rosen, Discrete Mathematics & Its Applications. Prepared by (c) , Michael P. Frank. Modified By Mingwu Chen 1 Module.
CS104:Discrete Structures Chapter 2: Proof Techniques.
Introduction to Proofs
Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.
Proof Techniques Chuck Cusack
Section 1.7. Section Summary Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs Proof of the Contrapositive Proof by Contradiction.
Proof And Strategies Chapter 2. Lecturer: Amani Mahajoub Omer Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Discrete Structures Definition Discrete.
Proof Techniques CS160/CS122 Rosen: 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.
Lecture 2: Proofs and Recursion. Lecture 2-1: Proof Techniques Proof methods : –Inductive reasoning Lecture 2-2 –Deductive reasoning Using counterexample.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
Methods of Proof Proof techniques in this handout
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/17
Direct Proof by Contraposition Direct Proof by Contradiction
Proof methods We will discuss ten proof methods: Direct proofs
Methods of Proof CS 202 Epp, chapter 3.
Predicate Calculus Validity
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Proof Techniques.
Discrete Mathematics and its Applications
Module #10: Proof Strategies
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Mathematical Reasoning
Methods of Proof. Methods of Proof Definitions A theorem is a valid logical assertion which can be proved using Axioms: statements which are given.
Week #6 – 30 September / 2/4 October 2002 Prof. Marie desJardins
Indirect Proof by Contradiction Direct Proof by Cases
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Inference Rules: Tautologies
Methods of Proof Rosen 1.7, 1.8 Lecture 4: Sept 24, 25.
Information Technology Department SKN-SITS,Lonavala.
Module #10: Proof Strategies
Geometry.
September 9, 2004 Prof. Marie desJardins (for Prof. Matt Gaston)
Logic Logic is a discipline that studies the principles and methods used to construct valid arguments. An argument is a related sequence of statements.
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics
Mathematical Reasoning
Discrete Mathematics and its Applications
Agenda Proofs (Konsep Pembuktian) Direct Proofs & Counterexamples
Introduction to Proofs
Methods of Proof Rosen 1.7, 1.8 Lecture 4: Sept, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Proofs Section 1.6

Definition Proof: is a valid argument that establishes the truth of a mathematical statement. It may use axioms, hypothesis, rules of inference, other propositions (facts), lemmas, corollaries, & theorems.

Proof Formal Informal Long Short Difficult to Easy to construct construct & read & read

Definitions Axioms (postulates) are statements that can be assumed to be true. Theorem: is a statement that can be proven to be true. Conjecture: is a statement that one believe it is true, but has not been proven yet. Less Important theorems are called Proposition Lemma: if used to prove other theorems Corollary: if concluded from a theorem

Remark Mathematicians usually don’t use universal quantifiers (or universal instantiation or generalization) explicitly.

Example  x (P(x)  Q(x)) will be written as If P(x), then Q(x) where x belongs to its domain. When we try to prove it, we should show that P(c)  Q(c) for arbitrary c in the domain.

Proof Techniques Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs Proof by contraposition Proof by contradiction

Direct Proofs For: “p  q” Or  x ( P(x)  Q(x)) To prove such statements assume that p (or P(c)) is true use all possible facts, lemmas, theorems, and rules of inferences and try to show that q (or Q(c)) is true.

Definition nZ is even   kZ s.t. n = 2k nZ is odd   kZ s.t. n = 2k+1 nZ is a perfect square  n=k2 for some kZ. Note: nZ  n is even  n is odd

Theorem If nZ is odd, then n2 is odd, i.e.,  nZ (n is odd  n2 is odd ) Proof. (Direct) Assume that nZ is odd, then by definition  k Z s.t. n=2k+1 Then n2 = (2k+1)2 = 4 k2 + 4 k + 1 = 2(2k2 + 2 k) + 1 = 2 m + 1 And so n2 is odd.

Theorem If n, mZ are perfect squares, then nm is also a perfect square. Proof. (direct) Let n, m be perfect squares. Then n=k2 and m=l2 for some k, lZ. Then nm=k2 l2= (k l) 2. And so nm is a perfect square.

Indirect Proofs. Proof by contraposition: Note that pq  q  p So to prove pq we need to assume q and try to prove p

Examples If nZ and 3n+2 is odd, then n is odd Proof. (by contraposition) Assume that n is even Then n = 2 k for some integer k So 3n+2 = 6 k +2 = 2 (3k+1) = 2 m Thus 3n+2 is even

a  sqrt(n) or b  sqrt(n) Examples If n= a b where a & b are positive integers, then a  sqrt(n) or b  sqrt(n) Proof. (by contraposition) assume a > sqrt(n) & b > sqrt(n) Then a b > n, i.e., a b  n

Vacuous & Trivial Proofs Consider p  q Vacuous Proof: if p is false then the statement is always true. Trivial Proof: if q is true then the statement is always true.

Examples If 0>1, then n2 > n for any integer n. (vacuous) If a > b, then a2  0. (trivial)

Definition Any real number r is rational iff there are two integers n and m s.t. m  0 and r =n/m. r is irrational iff it is not rational. We write Q for the set of all rational.

Theorem  x, yQ, x + yQ Or  x, yR ( x,y Q  x + yQ ) Proof. (direct) Let x, yQ. Then x = n1/m1 and y =n2/m2, and m1  0  m2 Then x+y = n1/m1 + n2/m2 = (n1m2 + n2m1 )/ (m1m2 ) So x + yQ

Theorem If nZ and n2 is odd, then n is odd Proof Direct: n2 = 2k+1, and so n = sqrt(2k+1), and then ....??? Contraposition: n is even  n = 2k  n2 = 4 k2 = 2(2k2)  n2 is even

Proofs by contradiction To prove that p is true, we show that p leads to some kind of a contradiction=F proposition like (r r)=F. To prove that p  q by contradiction, we assume that p is true & q is false and try to get a contradiction, i.e., (p q) F.

Example Sqrt(2) is irrational. Proof. (by contradiction) Assume not, i.e., sqrt(2) = n/m for some integers n and m0. We can assume that n and m have no common factors. Then 2 = n2/m2, or indeed 2 m2= n2 Which means that n2 is even So n is even (by theorem)

Continue .. So n = 2k and hence n2= 4k2 =2 m2 Or 2 k2 = m2, and so m2 is even This means that both n and m are even, i.e., they have a common factors! Which is a contradiction with what we have assume at the beginning.

Theorem n is even iff nk is even for any integer k>1. n is odd iff nk is odd for any integer k>1. Proof. Exercise

Theorem At least 4 of any 22 days must fall on the same day of week Proof: (by contradiction) Assume not, i.e., each day of the week is repeated at most 3 times. Then the number of days is  3 x 7=21 days, which is a contradiction.

Theorem The following are equivalent P: n is even Q: n-1 is odd R: n2 is even This means that P  Q  R OR (P Q) (Q R)  (R p)

Proof (P) n is even  n = 2k n-1 = 2k-1 = 2(k-1) + 1  n-1 is odd (Q) (Q) n-1 is odd  n-1 = 2k+1  n = 2(k+1)  n2 = 2 (2 (k+1)2)  n2 is even (R) (R) n2 is even  n is even (P)

Counter Examples Every positive integer is the sum of the squares of two integers. Not true: Proof: (by counter example) Consider 3 and notice that 3=2+1=3+0 And so it’s not a sum of two squares.

Mistakes in Proofs Be careful of Fallacy of affirming the conclusion Fallacy of denying the hypothesis Fallacy of begging the question (or circular reasoning) Read about this in section 1.6.

Mistakes in Proofs Theorem: 1 = 2 Proof: Let a and b be equal integers Then a = b and so a2 = ab so a2 – b2 = ab – b2 (a-b)(a+b) = b(a-b) a+b = b 2b = b 2=1 !!!