Final Slides Attitude Control System (ACS) – Lunar Transfer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Attitude Determination and Control
Advertisements

AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Propellant Choice and Mass Estimates for the Translunar OTV Week 2 Presentation Thursday, Jan 22, 2009 Brad Appel Propulsion Group.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Presentation Draft Slides Description: Some draft slides and ideas 3/26/09 Kris Ezra Attitude 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Time to Complete 50m/s ΔV & 100g Payload System Overview Brittany Waletzko 100g Payload Integration Manager Translunar/OTV Phase Week.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hopper Trajectory February 26, 2009 [Alex Whiteman] [Mission Ops] [Lunar Descent] Page 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Arbitrary Payload Cost Optimization to LLO Tasks: Payload Cost / Mass Optimization (Launch to LLO) Disprove Momentum Transfer Alternative.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 8 Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Masses and Costs Ian Meginnis March 12, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems Phase Leader -
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Analysis Cold Xe Gas Thrusters [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lander Phase: Hybrid Propulsion System Propulsion System Sizing and Inert Mass Analysis Hopper and Rover Designs for 10kg Payload Hopper.
AAE450 Spring 2009 More Attitude Control Thruster Options Brittany Waletzko Translunar/OTV Phase Week 7 Brittany Waletzko - ATT.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Preliminary Lunar Descent Attitude Control Analysis Christine Troy Assistant Project Manager Webmaster Lunar Descent Attitude Control.
AAE450 Spring Attitude Control – Arbitrary Payload Christine Troy Assistant Project Manager Webmaster Lunar Descent Attitude Control Analysis Design.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Sizing and Trajectory Design for 100 g/10kg Payloads [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] March 12,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Project X pedition Final slides outline for Orbital Transfer Vehicle Propulsion Week 11 Presentation Thursday, March 26, 2009 Brad Appel.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Propellant Requirements Attitude Control Thrusters with Low Thrust Orbit Trajectories [Josh Lukasak] [Attitude Group Lead]
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Descent Final Numbers Josh Lukasak Attitude Group Lead Lunar Decent Phase Lead 03/12/09 [Josh Lukasak] [Attitude] (1)
AAE450 Spring 2009 Translunar Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV): Propulsion System Setup for 100g & 10 kg Case Launch Vehicle Selection for Arbitrary Case Thermal.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Descent Trajectory Hover Trajectory LD Code Integration John Aitchison March 5 th, 2009 [John Aitchison] [Mission Ops]
AAE450 Spring Gram Mission Integration and Model Korey LeMond STRC/THM/INTEG GL [Korey LeMond] [STRC/THM/INTEG/CAD GL, OTV Phase] 1.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Preliminary propulsion system selection and design analysis Thursday, January 22, 2009 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Translunar OTV (Orbital Transfer Vehicle) : Chemical Propulsion System Refined estimates: OTV WET Mass, Propellant Volume & Propellant.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Capture Altitude Mass to LLO for Arbitrary Time to Rotate Lander During Descent Camera/Dust Removal [Kara Akgulian] [Mission Ops]
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hopper Design Alternative Josh Lukasak Attitude Group Lead Lunar Decent Phase Lead 02/26/09 [Josh Lukasak] [Attitude] (1)
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Thruster Analysis [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
AAE450 Spring Lunar Descent Attitude Control Analysis Christine Troy Assistant Project Manager Webmaster Lunar Descent Attitude Control Analysis.
Week 13 Presentation Thursday, April 9 th, 2009 Saad Tanvir Propulsion Group 1 Lunar Descent – Hybrid Propulsion System Propulsion System Inert Mass Finals.
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
1 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides 1.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
AAE450 Spring 2009 OTV 3-D GEOMETRY & INTEGRATION Korey LeMond STRC/THM/INTEG/CAD GL, Locomotion Phase OTV Phase [Korey LeMond] [STRC/THM/INTEG/CAD GL,
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Eric Stoneking Paul Mason May 17, 2002 ACS.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 7 Final Presentation Slides Ian Meginnis April 9, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems Phase Leader - Translunar Injection OTV.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 8 Final Presentation Back-up Slides Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Power and Thermal Control Ian Meginnis Ian Meginnis Power.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
Final Slides By: Kara Akgulian Mission Ops Locomotion Phase 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel 2/5/09 Structures and Thermal Lunar Descent Phase Kelly Leffel Structures and Thermal 1.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
THEMIS MIWG #3Probe Separation Analysis - Page 1June 15 & Probe Separation Analysis Daniel Rummel UCB.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hydrogen Peroxide vs. Hydrazine Attitude Control Thrusters Brittany Waletzko Translunar/OTV Phase Week 5 Brittany Waletzko - ATT.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Lander Volume and Mass 10kg, 100g, Arbitrary March 12, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
1 Mid term – Laser Swarm Pruned Design Option Tree ADCS.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lander Sizing and Launch Vibrations Feb. 12, 2009 Earth Launch/Lunar Descent Phase Group 1 [Ryan Nelson] [STRC]
Cost Comparison of Higher Parking Orbit Scale up for Arbitrary Payload
Week 6 Presentation Thursday, Feb 19, 2009
Attitude, Lunar Transfer Phase
Three-Body Trajectory Model and Spiral Transfer Matching
Ian Meginnis January 29, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems
Fixed Main Engine versus Gimbal Mounted Alternative
Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Lunar Descent Slide Suggestions & Questions
Lunar Descent Trajectory
SPECS 2004 Various ADCS Sizing
Environmental Perturbing Forces & Effect on Attitude Control
Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Power Systems
Solomon Westerman, PM “Polished” Final Slide Layout Week 13.
By: Josh Lukasak Attitude Group Lead Lunar Descent Phase Manager
Final Presentation Slides
Lunar Descent Trajectory
[Kara Akgulian] [Mission Ops]
Lunar Descent Trajectory Optimization
Week 4 Presentation Thursday, Feb 5, 2009
Ian Meginnis January 29, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems
Presentation transcript:

Final Slides Attitude Control System (ACS) – Lunar Transfer Brian Erson Final Slides Attitude Control System (ACS) – Lunar Transfer

Environmental Pertubations contribute to trajectory offsets Sun sensor Tells reaction wheels to make adjustments Thrusters fire to desaturate reaction wheels Star Sensors maintain inertial reference ACS aides OPS in maintaining trajectory

Importance of Attitude Control During Lunar Transfer Thrust Misalignment and Environmental perturbations contribute to trajectory offsets Reaction Wheels and Thrusters provide control to OTV during Lunar Transfer

Final ACS Numbers 100g payload 10kg payload Large payload Device Mass (kg) Cost ($) Power Required(W) Volume (m3) VF STC 1 (star sensor) 6.4 133,333 20.4 0.0163 VF SNS (sun sensor) 0.7 5 VF MR 4.0 10.4 76 0.009375 thruster 0.36 1,500 -- 0.000009 propellant 0.02 100 Inert Mass 1.9 1,000 0.0000696 Totals 19.8 403,000 101.4 0.0420536 Device Mass (kg) Cost ($) Power Required(W) Volume (m3) VF STC 1 (star sensor) 6.4 133,333 20.4 0.0163 VF SNS (sun sensor) 0.7 5 VF MR 10.0 20 120 0.009375 thruster 0.36 1,500 -- 0.000009 Propellant 1.26 100 Inert Mass 3.02 1,000 0.00126 Totals 31.74 403,000 145.4 0.043244 Large payload Note: Star and Sun sensors remain on Lander after separation Device Mass (kg) Cost ($) Power Required(W) Volume (m3) VF STC 1 (star sensor) 6.4 133,333 20.4 0.0163 VF SNS (sun sensor) 0.7 5 VF MR 19.6 42 280 0.0258 H202 thruster 0.36 2,500 -- 0.00003 H202 Propellant 10.6 100 Inert Mass 13.84 1,000 0.00957 Totals 73.9 404,000 305.4 0.068 Backup