Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Advertisements

Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements NERC ORS Meeting Toronto, Ontario September 23-24, 2009 Jim.
Parallel Flow Visualization and Flowgate Allocations Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners.
First to Curtail – Last to Curtail Examples December 1 – 2, 2010 (Revised based on Requests/Suggestions During Review) 1.
First to Curtail – Last to Curtail Examples December 1 - 2,
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair September 13 th, 2012.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 2, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update April 30, 2012.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
© 2009 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ______________ WECC November 12, 2012.
Overview Seams Coordination Process. 2 Introduction Midwest ISO Non-profit organization that manages the reliable flow of electricity across much of the.
Want to be a Path Operator?. No true definition of Path Operator in Reliability requirements, responsible entities listed are RC, TOP, TO, BA, GO, GOP,
Interchange Authority Recommendations Board of Directors Meeting December 7, 2007.
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
POTF Status update.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
FEBRUARY 27, 2013 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS Parallel Flow Visualization Overview 1.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Jeremy West Sr. Operations Engineer.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
NERC Functional Model AND HOW IT RELATES TO THE ERCOT REGION
SPP.org 1. 2 Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS)
11 Why BPA Transmission Customers Aggregate Reservations Feb. 20, 2013.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup BY LOU MIRANDA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
2-Tier Firm Curtailment: First-to-Curtail & Last-to-Curtail Examples NAESB BPS: August 9-10,
Business Practices Subcommittee
Business Practices Subcommittee Update May 4, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update Executive Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
AFC METHODOLOGY EMS USER GROUP SEP 12, 2004 AFC – New Developments EMS USER GROUP Sep
Transmission Congestion Management – IDC Granularity Option 3A Larry Kezele and Jeff Norman June 28, 2005 NERC/NAESB TLR Subcommittee.
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
TOP and BA Responsibilities SPP Wind Workshop May 30, 2013.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
2013 Wind Conference. Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown.
Generator Prioritization Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update Yasser Bahbaz IDCWG Chair BPS Update September 13 th, 2011.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update October 27, 2009.
Parking Lot Item 19. BPS Bert Bressers 10/31/2011 Firm rights of resources that have a Firm priority to what load (Sink area granularity)
Business Practices Subcommittee Update Executive Committee Meeting February 23, 2016.
NAESB BPS UPDATE TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUGUST 21, 2012 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS PARALLEL FLOW VISUALIZATION PROJECT 1.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
1 Parallel Flow Visualization Goals NAESB BPS Meeting September 15-16, 2010.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update
Phase Angle Limitations
Business Practices Subcommittee Update
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee MIC/OC Report
Business Practices Subcommittee Update
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC)
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
NERC Congestion Management
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and BPS Subcommittees
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview August 16, 2011

Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview Terminology Transmission Loading Relief (TLR) Two-Tier Curtailment Concept First-to-Curtail/Last-to-Curtail Examples 2 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Terminology Flowgate – A portion of the transmission system through which the Interchange Distribution Calculator (IDC) calculates the power flow from Interchange Transactions. A mathematical construct, comprised of one or more monitored transmission facilities and optionally one or more contingency facilities, used to analyze the impact of power flows upon the Bulk Electric System. Off-Path Flows Flows that cannot be traced to the Transmission Service Provider’s (TSP’s) transmission service because, by definition, off-path flows are flows from neighboring transmission systems that are not reserved on the TSP’s system. These are also referred to as Loop Flows, Off-the Path Flows, Unscheduled Flows, or Parallel Flows. On-Path Flows Flows that can be traced back to existing transmission service and their corresponding service priorities on the TSP that owns the flowgate. These are also referred to as Contract Path Flows, On-the-Path Flows or Scheduled Flows. 3 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Terminology Interchange Distribution Calculator (IDC) – The mechanism used by Reliability Coordinators in the Eastern Interconnection to calculate the distribution of Interchange Transactions over specific flowgates. It includes a database of all Interchange Transactions and a matrix of the distribution factors for the Eastern Interconnection. Tool to calculate the impact of flows on a flowgate including the source of the flow (includes both scheduled and unscheduled flows on the flowgate) Book of Flowgates (BOF) The master list of flowgates used by the IDC. Flowgates are added by to the BOF at the Reliability Coordinators request, in part to manage congestion in their footprint. Transmission Loading Relief (TLR) A procedure used in the Eastern Interconnection to relieve potential or actual loading on a Constrained Facility or Flowgate. Reliability Coordinators submits a TLR Relief request to the IDC IDC calculates relief obligations for those contributing to congestion 4 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Transmission Loading Relief (TLR) Levels The TLR Process has a series of TLR levels from 0-6: Level 0 is lowest state (terminates a TLR event) Level 6 is the highest level which can result in “shedding load” Two-tier firm curtailment is associated with Level 5 TLR events. Current environment - TLR Level 5 analysis shows that the following actions can prevent exceeding the System Operating Limit (SOL) or Interconnection Reliability Operating Limit (IROL): Full curtailment of non-firm Interchange Transactions and energy flows, and Reconfiguration of the transmission system, if possible, and Full or partial curtailment or reallocation of firm Interchange Transactions and energy flows. 5 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

TLR Assigning Priorities The TLR priority of on-path transactions (from the perspective of the TSP experiencing congestion) are determined from the priority of the transmission service associated with the transaction. The priority of the off-path transactions are determined by the Weakest Link method whereby the TLR procedure assigns the priority of an off-path transaction as the lowest priority of all transmission service reservations associated with the transaction, from any TSP on the path of the transaction. (Off-path transactions don’t have associated transmission service on the TSP experiencing the congestion.) 6 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Concept The two-tier firm curtailment concept proposes to assign two levels of firm curtailment priorities for the purpose of TLR (First- to-Curtail and Last-to-Curtail). If all segments on the contract path are firm and the TSP for any segment does not have a coordination agreement with the TSP experiencing congestion the entire transaction will be considered as First-to-Curtail. In all other cases where all segments on the contract path are firm the entire transaction will be considered as Last-to-Curtail. Intra-BA firm Point-to-Point, native and network transactions will follow the same rules recognizing that intra-BA transactions have only a single segment. 7 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Concept (cont.) The Two-Tier Firm Curtailment concept provides a mechanism to address off-path firm flows on a flowgate prior to on-path flows. Two-tier curtailment applies to the Eastern Interconnection. The concept: provides an optional process that allows a TSP to ensure their flows remain in a last-to-curtail category provided coordination occurs with impacted neighbors, which may be beyond the adjacent neighbor, Provides a common approach for dealing with Parallel Flows in the Eastern Interconnection. IDC The concept will require modifications to the IDC for calculating firm relief assignments for Balancing Authorities when congestion occurs on a flowgate based on the analysis/evaluation that was done at the time service was sold/granted. 8 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

First-to-Curtail / Last-to-Curtail First-to-Curtail includes off-path (not reserved on the TSP’s system experiencing the congestion) firm service (Interchange Transactions, network and native load service) if any TSP providing transmission service on the contract path has not previously entered into Coordination Agreement with the TSP experiencing congestion. Last-to-Curtail includes on-path firm transactions with reservations that were procured and granted firm service on the TSP’s system experiencing the congestion. Off-path firm service (Interchange Transactions, network and native load service) will also be treated as Last-to-Curtail if all TSPs providing transmission service on the contract path have previously entered into Coordination Agreement(s) with the TSP experiencing congestion. 9 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Examples Inter-BA Transmission Service Current Curtailment Two-Tier Curtailment – No Coordination Agreement Two-Tier Curtailment – Coordination Agreement Intra-BA Transmission Service 10 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Current Curtailment (Inter-BA Transmission Service) Firm Transmission Service sold/granted from BA-1 to BA-3 and from BA-2 to BA-3 Congestion is occurring on Flowgate 223. Both Flows A and B are contributing to congestion on flowgate 223. Both flows used in calculating relief obligations on the same level (Flow A service was sold/granted in BA 2, Flow B was not) BA 2 BA 1 BA 3 Flow A FG 223 FG 102 Flow B FG 315 Note: Parallel Flow impacts are subject to TLR curtailments only to the extent the impacts exceed the minimum IDC Threshold. 11 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Two-Tier Curtailments – No Coordination Agreement (Inter-BA Transmission Service) Firm Transmission Service sold/granted from BA-1 to BA-3 and BA-2 to BA-3 No Coordination Agreement exists Both Flows A & B are contributing to congestion on FG 223 Flows A goes into Last-to-Curtail (Service sold/ granted in BA-2) Flow B goes into First-to-Curtail (Service not sold/ granted in BA-2) BA 2 BA 1 BA 3 Flow A FG 223 FG 102 Flow B FG 315 Note: Parallel Flow impacts are subject to TLR curtailments only to the extent the impacts exceed the minimum IDC Threshold. 12 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Two-Tier Curtailments – Coordination Agreement (Inter-BA Transmission Service) Firm Transmission Service sold/granted from BA-1 to BA-3 and BA-2 to BA-3 Coordination Agreement exists between TSPs in BA-1 and BA-2 TSPs in BA-1 and BA-2 analyzed impacts of Flows prior to selling /granting service Congestion is occurring on FG 223 both Flows A & B are contributing to Flows A and B goes into Last-to-Curtail BA 2 BA 1 BA 3 Flow A FG 223 FG 102 Flow B FG 315 Note: Parallel Flow impacts are subject to TLR curtailments only to the extent the impacts exceed the minimum IDC Threshold. 13 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Current Curtailment (Intra-BA Transmission Service) Firm Transmission Service sold/granted from BA-1 to BA-3 and within BA-2 Congestion is occurring on FG 315 both Flows A & B are contributing to congestion Flows A is not subject to curtailment (not reported to the IDC) Flow B is used to determine curtailment relief obligation BA 2 BA 1 BA 3 Flow A FG 223 FG 102 Flow B FG 315 Note: Parallel Flow impacts are subject to TLR curtailments only to the extent the impacts exceed the minimum IDC Threshold. 14 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Two-Tier Curtailments – No Coordination Agreement (Intra-BA Transmission Service) Firm Transmission Service sold/granted from BA-1 to BA-3 and within BA-2 No Coordination Agreement exists Congestion is occurring on FG 315 both Flows A & B are contributing to congestion Flows A goes into First-to-Curtail Flow B goes into Last-to-Curtail BA 2 BA 1 BA 3 Flow A FG 223 FG 102 Flow B FG 315 Note: Parallel Flow impacts are subject to TLR curtailments only to the extent the impacts exceed the minimum IDC Threshold. 15 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Two-Tier Curtailments – Coordination Agreement (Intra-BA Transmission Service Example) Firm Transmission Service sold/granted from BA-1 to BA-3 and within BA 2 Coordination Agreement exists with TSPs in BA-1 and BA-3 When selling/granting service TSP in BA-2 considered impact on BA-3 Congestion is occurring on Flowgate 315 both Flows A & B are contribution to congestion Both Flows A & B go into Last-to-Curtail BA 2 BA 1 BA 3 Flow A FG 223 FG 102 FG 315 Note: Parallel Flow impacts are subject to TLR curtailments only to the extent the impacts exceed the minimum IDC Threshold. 16 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Summary Under the current process those entities that purchase firm transmission service on a particular path are subject to the same pro-rata curtailments as those who did not purchase firm transmission service on the path when congestion occurs on a particular flowgate and both flows are contributing to the congestion. Two-Tier Curtailments provides a set of standards for addressing parallel flows in the Eastern Interconnection. If an entity does not cause parallel flows that contribute congestion on another system there are no additional requirements. (There would be no need/incentive to enter into Coordination Agreements.) 17 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com Questions ? 18 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com