BMW How the outcome may be utilized in the implementation of the WFD Seppo Rekolainen Finnish Environment Institute - SYKE

Programme of Measures we have to take into account Article 5 analysis we need to establish PoMs in order to achieve the objectives set according to Article 4

Programme of Measures Basic measures Supplementary measures measures set in other Community legislation partly societal, partly technical Supplementary measures mostly societal, may include also technical

How to assess required actions – Links to Art 5 (and 4) High Good Moderate Poor Bad 1 Set the objectives Links to Article 5 Y Waterbody N Does the waterbody meet the objective N How much the ecological quality need to be improved ? How much pressures need to be reduced? Technical measures required Societal responses

How to assess required actions – Need of tools High Good Moderate Poor Bad 1 Set the objectives Tools (models) needed Y Does the waterbody meet the objective N How much the ecological quality need to be improved ? How much pressures need to be reduced? Technical measures required Societal responses

Links between societal and technical measures, and pressures Legislation Administrative instruments Economic/fiscal instruments Codes of good practice Societal response Technical measures Loading control Water management Management practices Nutrient loads Water level regulation Pressures Chemical and ecological elements State

Programme of Measures we need to identify and quantify the links from societal instruments down to ecological quality many kind of tools will be needed in this work River basin managers and member states may need help in selection of proper tools … and in assessing and reducing uncertainties

Selecting proper tools and reducing uncertainties Model catalogues – BMW Diffuse pollution models – EUROHARP Model Evaluation Tool – BMW Tools to quantify links between chemical and ecological status – REBECCA Good modelling practice - HarmoniQUA

WG2B activities and R&D projects If WG2B will identify the procedure and options for different steps and points to be considered in establishing the PoM It may utilize and establish links to the R&D outcome (especially the Toolboxes) to provide information on the availability and proper use of assessment tools It may also use the outcome of the R&D of the QA/QC and uncertainty assesment of the PoM R&D projects will be happy be involved in the job

Evaluate a model code for your application On this platform you can evaluate the model code of your choice for your particular model application, using the Benchmark Criteria. The Model Evaluation Tool has been designed to support the dialogue between the water manager (the client) and the modeller, to assess the appropriateness of a model code for a specific project. If you want to use this Model Evaluation Tool on your own PC, you can download the Model Evaluation. The results can be uploaded to the RBM Toolbox, in order to be useful for other water managers and model users. You can also select a model code from those listed in the RBM Toolbox Model Catalogue. Evaluate a model code for your application Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Download the Model Evaluation Tool

Model code evaluation for Model application  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA MyLake model Vansjo  1.1 Management Objectives Mandatory considerations Manager’s considerations consideration 1 consideration 2 Modeller’s considerations consideration 1 consideration 2 Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Score Justification

Popup the guidance for the water manager on this question  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA MyLake model Vansjo Popup the guidance for the water manager on this question  1.1 Management Objectives Mandatory considerations Manager’s considerations consideration 1 consideration 2 Modeller’s considerations consideration 1 consideration 2 Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Score Justification

Popup the guidance for the modeller on this question  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA MyLake model Vansjo Popup the guidance for the modeller on this question  1.1 Management Objectives Mandatory considerations Manager’s considerations consideration 1 consideration 2 Modeller’s considerations consideration 1 consideration 2 Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Score Justification

Model code evaluation for Model application  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA MyLake model Vansjo  1.4 Requirements for outputs Mandatory considerations Manager’s considerations The model outputs are relevant to the management objectives The model output is suitable for presenation in reports, policy documents etc … Modeller’s considerations The model code directly produces the required outputs It is a straightforward task to produce the required outputs from the model … Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Score Justification

Model code evaluation for Model application  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA Fjord model Vansjo Guidance for the Water Manager: Make a list of required model outputs Consider the suitability of the presentation techniques (report, meetings …) Consider the flexibility of the model output  1.4 Requirements for outputs Mandatory considerations Manager’s considerations The model outputs are relevant to the management objectives The model output is suitable for presenation in reports, policy documents etc … Modeller’s considerations The model code directly produces the required outputs It is a straightforward task to produce the required outputs from the model … Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Score Justification

Model code evaluation for Model application  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA MyLake model Vansjo Guidance for the modeller: Make a list of standard model output Consider the effort needed to produce extra output Collect relevant examples of the types of output from previous studies  1.4 Requirements for outputs Mandatory considerations Manager’s considerations The model outputs are relevant to the management objectives The model output is suitable for presenation in reports, policy documents etc … Modeller’s considerations The model code directly produces the required outputs It is a straightforward task to produce the required outputs from the model … Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Score Justification

Model code evaluation for Model application  Selected model code  Model study application NIVA MyLake model Vansjø  1.1 Management Objectives  1.2 Requirements for model functionality  1.3 Data availability  1.4 Requirements for model outputs  1.5 Interaction with the Model Benchmark considerations irrelevant adequate good user defined inadequate  2.1 Model spatial resolution and scale  2.2 Model temporal resolution and scale  2.3 Model complexity  2.4 Model parameterization  2.5 Model sensitivity  2.6 Model validation and usage  2.7 Model development  2.8 Model documentation good Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links good adequate good adequate adequate inadequate adequate  Evaluation result and recommendation for: Suitability of model code for model application Vansjø adequate

This shows the Justifcation  Selected model code  Model study application Model code evaluation for Model application NIVA MyLake model Vansjø  1.1 Management Objectives  1.2 Requirements for model functionality  1.3 Data availability  1.4 Requirements for model outputs  1.5 Interaction with the Model Mandatory considerations This shows the Justifcation irrelevant adequate good user defined inadequate  2.1 Model spatial resolution and scale  2.2 Model temporal resolution and scale  2.3 Model complexity  2.4 Model parameterization  2.5 Model sensitivity  2.6 Model validation and usage  2.7 Model development  2.8 Model documentation Optional considerations good Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links good adequate good adequate adequate inadequate adequate  Evaluation result and recommendation Suitability model code for model application adequate

Download the english text file Select a language Add your own language The Model Evaluation Tool is by default in English. You may translate the texts in your own language and submit the translated version to the RBM Toolbox. Model Evaluation About Model Evaluation Previous Evaluations Make Your Evaluation Submit Evaluation to Toolbox Download Model Evaluation Tool Subset Links Download the english text file Submit your translated text file