Ipsus [?], 301 BC Strategic Context Stakes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marathon August [?], 490 BC Strategic Context After the failures of an expedition in 492 BC and diplomacy the following year, Darius of Persia invades.
Advertisements

The Battle of Gaugamela. The March to Gaugamela The Battle of Gaugamela - Background From his camp, Alexander could see: He was outnumbered at least.
Kosovo June 20, 1389 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire is growing steadily at the expense of neighbouring powers in the Balkans where Murad I wishes.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context The overall strategic situation of the American Revolutionary War is already decidedly in the American favour.
Leuthen December 5, 1757 Strategic Context The Seven Years’ War begins! Backed only by Britain after attacking Saxony, Prussia finds itself surrounded.
The Ice April 5, 1242 Strategic Context The Catholic and Orthodox Churches collided in the Baltic during Christianity’s spread from Palestine, hence the.
Pydna June 22, 168 BC Strategic Context Following the death of Philip V of Macedon in 179 BC, Perseus of Macedon hopes to renew his father’s ambition of.
Adrianople August 9, 378 Strategic Context The Visigoths and Ostrigoths conspire to assassinate Roman Emperor Valens but fail; the Romans consequently.
Maling 342 BC Strategic Context Of the Seven Warring States in China, Wei finds itself particularly vulnerable following its defeat at the Battle of Kuei-ling.
Fornovo July 6, 1495 Strategic Context In February 1495, Charles VIII of France is able to conquer Naples with the help of Milan, following a long march.
Saratoga October 7, 1777 Strategic Context The British look to strangle the American Revolution in 1777 by cutting off the more troublesome northeastern.
The Marne September 5-9, 1914 Strategic Context As more states join the growing European conflict, Germany seeks to avoid a simultaneous, two-front war.
Blenheim August 13, 1704 Strategic Context England, as part of its commitment to the Grand Alliance with Holland, Austria and Prussia, sends then-Earl.
Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost.
Torvioll June 29, 1444 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire recovers from its decade-long civil war in 1415, and subsequently seeks to reestablish control.
Bannockburn June 24, 1314 Strategic Context Edward I of England defeats William Wallace at the Battle of Falkirk in 1298, crushing the Scottish uprising.
Thymbra [?], 546 BC Strategic Context In 559 BC, Cyrus deposes Astyages of Media and begins to consolidate his new Persian state, which he accomplishes.
Ankara July 28, 1402 Strategic Context The clash between the Timurid and Ottoman Empires is somewhat inevitable in the early 1400s. Tamerlane’s Tatars.
THE INDIAN EXPEDITION VS. The Rock of Aornus  This was 2100 m high overlooking the Indus River  Alex was compelled to take it as the place had strategic.
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade attack the Roman Empire.
Lake Trasimene June 24, 217 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca negates Roman control of the seas by leading the Carthaginians through Spain.
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Vladislav III, the King of Poland and Hungary, encourages his general, John Hunyadi, to chase the Ottomans out.
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade the Roman Empire. Despite.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The khan’s authority falls.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Mongol-Tatar Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The Khan’s authority.
THE BATTLE OF GAUGAMELA 331 B.C. By Alexandra Bowers-Mason and Christina Main From Putaruru College.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context Britain’s American colonies revolt in 1775, provoking a large military response from Britain. The overall strategic.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attila leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attilla leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ad Decimum September 13, 533 Strategic Context Stakes No Image
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Stakes
The Successors of Alexander the Great
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Gaugamela October 1, 331 BC Strategic Context Stakes
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander the Great’s Last Great Battle
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander The Great The Major Battles.
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Battle of Jhelum (Hydaspes)
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander’s Legacy.
The Trebia December [?], 218 BC
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Daras [?], 530 Strategic Context Stakes
Strasbourg August [?], 357 Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ruspina January 4, 46 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Breitenfeld September 17, 1631
DANIEL 11.
Presentation transcript:

Ipsus [?], 301 BC Strategic Context Stakes As Alexander the Great lays dying in 323 BC, he is asked who should inherit his vast empire to which he reportedly answers: “the strongest.” Since then, five dominant figures emerge to struggle for the remains of his great empire: Ptolemy in Egypt, Cassander in Macedon, Lysimachus in Thrace, Seleucus in eastern Asia and Antigonus in western Asia. Alliances unsurprisingly shift constantly. Antigonus, occupying the central position, wants a united empire under one leader whereas the others are content to rule and expand their own realms. In 302 BC, the other leaders begin to cooperate effectively against Antigonus and seek to merge forces, mainly supplied by Seleucus and Lysimachus. Antigonus fails to defeat these in detail and now faces their combined might. Stakes + An Allied victory would end Antigonus’ ambitions of a united empire and cripple his own realm. + An Antigonid victory would fracture the coalition, allowing Antigonus to strike and defeat any one enemy. By Jonathan Webb, 2010 ©

Ipsus, 301 BC Strength Allies Well Antigonids Well Seleucus I Antigonus I Lysimachus Demetrius I 64,000 infantry 70,000 infantry 15,000 light cavalry 10,000 heavy cavalry 400 war elephants 75 war elephants 120 chariots By Jonathan Webb, 2010 ©

(Seleucus I/Lysimachus) 64,000 infantry 15,000 light cavalry Antigonus awaits the return of Demetrius as the Allied war elephants force his light infantry to retreat. The hidden Allied horse-archers exploit the exposed Antigonid right flank by firing arrows into the flanks of the infantry phalanx while war elephants and light infantry disrupt it by showering its front with missiles. On the Antigonid left wing, a fierce battle between war elephants develops. Seleucus deploys his infantry in the center with cavalry on the wings, the stronger left wing commanded by his son, Antiochus. The Allied chariots remain to the rear while most of the Allied line is fronted by war elephants and light infantry commanded by Lysimachus with horse-archers hidden just behind the elephant screen. Seleucus plans to lure away the Antigonid heavy cavalry and outflank the infantry phalanx. Antigonus deploys his infantry in the center with his heavy cavalry on the wings, the stronger right wing commanded by his son, Demetrius, and the weaker left wing covered by the meager force of war elephants commanded by Adronicus. Man-made obstacles in front of the Antigonid infantry protect them from the vast Allied war elephant force. Antigonus plans to rout the Allied left wing with heavy cavalry and strike the infantry phalanx from behind. Seleucus/Lysimachus continue to rake the Antigonid infantry phalanx with missiles, causing casualties and desertions. With Demetrius still out of sight, Antigonus seeks to preserve his force until his return by redeploying infantry to protect his right flank. The elephant battle on the Antigonid left continues inconclusively but is pinning Antigonid forces there. After patiently wearing down the Antigonid infantry phalanx, Seleucus launches the decisive attack with his infantry. Antigonus is killed early on in the engagement and his force quickly disintegrates, pursued by Allied forces. Antiochus harasses the Antigonid right wing by firing arrows and then retreating when Demetrius charges with his heavier cavalry, a pattern which carries the opposing cavalry forces away from the battlefield. Meanwhile, the Allied war elephants accompanied by light infantry, advance to skirmish with their Antigonid counterparts. Allies (Seleucus/Lysimachus) Allies (Seleucus I/Lysimachus) 64,000 infantry 15,000 light cavalry 400 war elephants 120 chariots Seleucus/Lysimachus Antiochus Antigonids (Antigonus I/Demetrius I) 70,000 infantry 10,000 heavy cavalry 75 war elephants Andronicus Demetrius Antigonus Antigonids (Antigonus/Demetrius)

Ipsus, 301 BC Casualties & Aftermath Allies: Antigonids: ≈3,000 or 4% ≈48,000 or 60% Demetrius escaped from this disaster but did not continue his father’s aspirations for a united Alexandrian empire. Antigonus’ defeat at Ipsus firmly established that there would be no such empire. The victors carved up the Antigonid realm immediately after the battle, eliminating any buffer between them and eventually leading to further maneuvering against one another for more land. These maneuvers culminated in the six Syrian Wars. By Jonathan Webb, 2010 ©

The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps http://www.theartofbattle.com By Jonathan Webb, 2010 ©