SETTINGS AS COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS AN INTRODUCTION TO COMPLEXITY SCIENCE FOR HEALTH PROMOTION PROFESSIONALS Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi Don Nutbeam,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
J. David Tàbara Institute of Environmental Science and Technology Autonomous University of Barcelona Integrated Climate Governance.
Leadership Science 1 Parsing the Influential Increment in the Language of Complexity Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2007 Jim Hazy Adelphi University.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Introduction to Organisation Development. Introduction Organizations develop over a period as they can not stand still even if they seek to maintain status.
Goodson Chapter 7 Resnicow & Page, 2008 Krieger, 1994.
Environment and climate change in development cooperation Wrap up– module 9 1.
Structural issues in Network Enabled Defence Matie du Toit (SISPA) Hugo Lotriet (University of Pretoria)
The purpose of this Unit is to enable individuals to develop the key principles, values and attitude which are central to high quality care practice Key.
Reflective Practice Leadership Development Tool. Context recognised that a key differentiator between places where people wanted to work and places where.
Working together across disciplines Challenges for the natural and social sciences.
Why don’t innovation models help with informatics implementations? Rod Ward University of the West of England Medinfo 2010.
GOAL: UNDERSTAND CAUSAL AND INFLUENCE NETWORKS IN COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS IN ORDER TO CONTROL THEM.
History, Theory, and Philosophy of Science (In SMAC + RT) 7th smester -Fall 2005 Institute of Media Technology and Engineering Science Aalborg University.
CHS 382 Fundamentals of Health Education
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Organization Development: Concept and Process -Tarak Bahadur KC, PhD
Crosscutting Concepts and Disciplinary Core Ideas February24, 2012 Heidi Schweingruber Deputy Director, Board on Science Education, NRC/NAS.
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
The Future of OD?: A Hopeful View of Where We Could Go MN OD Network June 7, 2012 David W. Jamieson University of St Thomas
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
AN INTRODUCTION TO ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Diffusion of Innovations Gerontology 820 Ashley Waldoch October 18, 2010.
BUILDING A COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE. Question 1: What is the mission of our network? To share knowledge and experiences. To extract lessons to improve dialogue.
Handicap International © Éric Martin / Le Figaro / Handicap International The Sustainability Analysis Process : the case of physical rehabilitation Introduction.
Why Theory Matters Jackie Green
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
What does Public Policy ask of Complexity Science? Peter Dick Department of Health, UK Government ECCS ’12, Brussels, September 2012.
Implementation and process evaluation: developing our approach Ann Lendrum University of Manchester Neil Humphrey University of Manchester Gemma Moss Institute.
Health Promotion Theory. Definition of Health Promotion control over : the act or fact of controlling; power to direct or regulate; ability to use effectively.
Chapter 2 Human System Perspectives. Theoretical Frameworks for Practice Theories about human systems Theories and models of change No one practice framework.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
RHS 303. TRANSITION OF THEORY AND TREATMENT nature of existence and gives meaning to and guides the action Philosophical Base: Philosophy of occupational.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
Combining Theory and Systems Building Experiences and Challenges Sotirios Terzis University of Strathclyde.
Sustainability Education and the Next Generation Science Standards.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
Understanding and using patterns in software development EEL 6883 Software Engineering Vol. 1 Chapter 4 pp Presenter: Sorosh Olamaei.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 5 Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Chapter Thirteen – Organizational Effectiveness.  Be able to define organizational effectiveness  Understand the issues underpinning measuring organizational.
Background, Philosophical Basis and Principles of Behavior.
Spatial ABM H-E Interactions, Lecture 4 Dawn Parker, George Mason University Notes on Grimm and Railsback Chapter 1, “Individual-based modeling and ecology”
EVIDENCE BASED POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS – TAKE AWAY LESSONS ON HOW TO PROGRESS EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL EDUCATION BETSY THOM Drug and Alcohol Research Centre MIDDLESEX.
How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.
Governance in the Postmodern Era: Implications of an Ecological Worldview Peter J. Robertson Associate Professor School of Policy, Planning, and Development.
Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter:
Organizational Learning and Influence of emerging business realities
Responsive Innovation for Disaster Mitigation Gordon A. Gow University of Alberta.
First European conference on drug supply indicators, , Brussels – Feed-back Chloé Carpentier, Laurent Laniel, EMCDDA 33 rd meeting of the.
Using Qualitative Methods to Identify System Dynamics and Inform System Evaluation Design Margaret Hargreaves Mathematica Policy Research American Evaluation.
Week 2: Interviews. Definition and Types  What is an interview? Conversation with a purpose  Types of interviews 1. Unstructured 2. Structured 3. Focus.
Critical Realism and Realist Synthesis Sam Porter School of Nursing and Midwifery March 2016.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 42 Emerging Theories Debra Tupe.
Bringing Diversity into Impact Evaluation: Towards a Broadened View of Design and Methods for Impact Evaluation Sanjeev Sridharan.
Spring ÇGIE lecture 41 lecture 4: complexity simple systems, complex systems –parallel developments that are joining together: systems literature.
Values, standards and the real world: regulation in context Tim Walker, Chief Executive 11 March 2016.
BEST ET AL., 2007 ISIS: Initiative on the Study and Implementation of Systems Systems Thinking in Tobacco Control.
Introduction to Machine Learning, its potential usage in network area,
Leading in a Complex Healthcare Environment
Global Health Competencies for UK Healthcare Professionals
Framework for Getting Results at Scale
Evaluation: For Whom and for What?
Distributed leadership
Problem-based learning
The Value of Twisting the Lion’s Tail: How the Design of Policy Experiments Impact Learning Outcomes for Adaptation Governance. Belinda McFadgen, PhD researcher,
Unit 4 Introducing the Study.
THE SYSTEMS APPROACH TO CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
Presentation transcript:

SETTINGS AS COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS AN INTRODUCTION TO COMPLEXITY SCIENCE FOR HEALTH PROMOTION PROFESSIONALS Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi Don Nutbeam, Louise Rowling

The presentation at a glance Aim of the presentation : contribution to the sustainability and effectiveness of the settings health promotion interventions Emergence of settings approach from adaptive developmental changes Emergence of systems approach to settings Relevance of CAS theories to HP challenges Applications and the way forward

What is the issue? We have a long way ahead ! Implementation gap in health promotion ( Nairobi call to action, 2010) 1. Holistic views in HP concepts are not reflected in practice 2. Achieving sustainable system-wide change in settings proved challenging Advances in Health promotion knowledge and theory but failure in effectiveness or sustainability of the health promoting change Health promoting change in a changing world!

How do we explain our failures? Various explanations Among the most popular and increasingly used terms : the general and vague term of complexity Complexity of health Complexity of behaviour change Complexity of settings Complexity of change (individual, environmental or organizational) Do we all mean similar meaning by the term complexity? Do we know enough about scientific meaning of complexity?

! World is changing Advancement in knowledge Globalization Environmental change Demographical movement Advances in information technology Emerging new diseases and new health challenges New communication technology Significant adaptive changes and developments in our understanding and approaches to health, people and settings

Changes in our collective understanding about health Non-Scientific approach to health Scientific approaches Reductionist approaches: Newtonian/Mechanical approach Individualistic approach (Medical/ behaviuoral models) Holistic approaches: Quantum/Social approach/population approach Health promotion approach Ecological approach Emerging understanding of a systems approach to health interventions And more recently complexity approach

Emergence of Settings health promotion approach Settings Health promotion is different with health promotion in settings. It is based on holistic approaches not reductionist approaches to health. The importance of settings as a whole entity and their complex context. Advocates for changes in context, System-level changes.

Settings as organisations Perception of settings as organsiations in settings HP (HPS,HPH,HPW,HPP ) What are the nature of organizations? Diverse perceptions : Complexity of organsiations Organisations as systems Do Settings HP interventions benefit enough of orgasniational science? Do Settings HP interventions benefit enough of systems theories and complexity science? :

Changing perceptions of Settings (organsiations) as systems Nature of organisations as systems: A variety of perceptions and Mechanical systems (simple) to achieve goals Organizations as closed systems Organisations as rational systems Organisations as social open systems More recently, organizations as complex systems and /or complex adaptive systems Does it matter how to perceive settings? YES We suggest to consider settings as Social complex adaptive systems (Keshavarz et al,2010)

Systems and complexity science (theories ) Different categorizations of systems, Snoweden, …: simple, complicated, complex or chaotic Complexity science stems from systems thinking and can be traced back to 1960s or even eralier Concerns complex and chaotic systems which can not be understood and managed by reductionist approaches No general consensus yet whether we can call it a science Implemented in many fields but relatively new in public health and very new in health promotion Includes a variety of theories including complex adaptive systems theory (CAS theroies) CAS theory is about change in complex systems including artificial, biological, ecological, and social systems

Good fit between CAS theory and settings HP Both are concerned with change Both consider settings as systems Both advocate for holistic approach Both value the context Both are influenced by systems thinking and holistic approaches Settings HP needs CAS insights now! - Complexity of change in settings : the key challenge for health professionals - Significant need for theoretical foundations (including systems and oragansiational insights ) to guide settings HP CAS theory provides promising insights for better understanding and management of change in complex systems

What difference does it make to consider settings as CAS systems Different observation and understanding of settings Different definition and explanation of the issue and challenges Better understanding and skills to deal with complexity of settings Asking different research questions More realistic goal definition and program planning Generating alternative solutions and evaluation Better management of complexity of effective and sustainable change in settings Application of CAS concepts in approaching health promoting schools (Keshavarz et all, 2010)

Considering settings as CAS Open Dynamic system with fuzzy boundaries Multi layer system Changing systems Diversity Multiple autonomous but interdependent agents (components) History and context dependent Interactive agents and systems regulatory mechanisms ( Rules and Values) flow of health information Non-linear and unpredictable Feedback mechanisms Selection and adaptation Emergent functions Health promoting function of settings is an emergent product of the interplay of the many factors indicated above over time.

CAS observatory tool ( Keshavarz et al, 2010) 1. What are the school components and multi layer systems? 2. What are the interaction patterns in and between schools and other systems? 3. How different are the schools components? 4. How different are schools? How does difference matter? 5. How is knowledge produced in schools? How does information flow in schools? 6. What are the feedback loops in school? 7. How do the schools function? What are the regulatory mechanisms governing the schools? How are they established? 8. How are credit and blame attributed in schools? 9. How does change happen?

Re-defining the issue : difficult adaptation to health promoting changes Considering settings as simple systems while they are complex adaptive systems. Inadequate adaptability of introduced health promoting changes for settings Failure in recognising these complexities and adaptation barrier Failure in achieving substantial and sustainable change.

Generating different solutions No single unifying solutions Solutions should be emergent function of interplay of many factors and agents of the settings Solutions should be time and context dependant Solutions should help settings to overcome barriers they experience to adapt to HP changes Settings should be able to adapt to Health promoting changes

Example : Principals of solution generation Develop strategies for formal and informal credit/blame attribution to health in settings Develop mechanism for effective flow of health related information in settings Establishing feed back mechanisms for settings health promotion function Develop thoughtful interaction networks between settings and health authorities Develop health promoting rules and regulations in settings

Summery points Complexity of change and settings a concessus in settings HP Significant need to contribution of systems thinking and complexity science Still little consultation of complexity theories in settings HP Inadequate theoretical foundations/ framework for change management in settings CAS theory appears to be a promising potential approach (conceptually and practically) to introduce a quantum change in settings HP CAS approached although very promising so far but needs further scientific exploration in different settings

The way forward: Alternative approaches to change management in settings health promotion Further efforts to develop frameworks able to reflect the complexity of achieving system-wide effective and sustainable health promoting change in settings Further exploration, implementation, and testing the CAS concepts in practice

Thanks! Any questions?