The complex evaluation framework. 2 Simple projects, complicated programs and complex development interventions Complicated programs Simple projects blue.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Note: more information is available at:
Advertisements

Theory-Based Evaluation:
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
When are Impact Evaluations (IE) Appropriate and Feasible? Michele Tarsilla, Ph.D. InterAction IE Workshop May 13, 2013.
© 2009 Berman Group. Evidence-based evaluation RNDr. Jan Vozáb, PhD partner, principal consultant Berman Group.
Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
February Dakar, Senegal
AusAID Bilateral Donor System Country Program Evaluations included in Performance Management and Evaluation Policy (PMEP) of the Agency Part of Tier 2.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Knowing if the RBF mechanism is working Incorporating Rigorous Impact Evaluation into your HRBF program Sebastian Martinez World Bank.
Supporting Integrated Health Systems Strengthening A CIDA Perspective.
Defending Australia and its National Interests Estimation versus Analysis A discussion of similarities and differences in approach.
1 Module 6: Clear link to results and monitoring of capacity development Effective Capacity Development From Theory to Practice.
1 Learning from Christian Aid Bolivia Impact assessment - climate change advocacy in Bolivia.
Evaluation in the Field: Putting Concepts into Action Janet Myers, PhD MPH Richard Vezina, MPH CAPS HIV Prevention Conference April 21, 2006.
IACT901 - Module 1 Planning Theory - Scope & Integration ABRS Hong Kong 2004 Penney McFarlane University of Wollongong.
Seminar on selected evaluation methodology issues 评估方法论研讨会 Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD Beijing, 16 July 2014 国际农业发展基金独立评估办公室 2014 年 7 月 16.
Achieving Lasting Impacts Understanding the shift to more programmatic approaches in CARE.
Plan © Plan Assessing programme effectiveness at the global level in a large and complex organisation Presentation delivered to the conference on Perspectives.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
An Integrated Approach to LED Promotion and the Critical Role of Local Government Challenges & Opportunities CLGF Energising Local Economies: Partnership.
Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.
Setting the Stage: Workshop Framing and Crosscutting Issues Simon Hearn, ODI Evaluation Methods for Large-Scale, Complex, Multi- National Global Health.
GSSR Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry socialinquiry.wordpress.com January 17, 2012 I. Mixed Methods Research II. Evaluation Research.
34 th Session – Working Together Task Force on Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM Standing Committee on Nutrition Mark Smulders,
BASELINE SURVEYS AND MONITORING OF PHARMACEUTICAL SITUATION IN COUNTRIES. Joseph Serutoke NPO/EDM WHO Uganda November 2002.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Humanitarian aid evaluation at Medecins sans Frontieres
Evaluating ‘system effects’ of large scale AIDS funding Kevin Kelly Third African Evaluation Association Conference 1-3 December 2004, Cape Town.
Current practices in impact evaluation Howard White Independent Evaluation Group World Bank.
SJI Impact Assessment 2014 Based on Impact Assessment for Development Agencies – Learning to Value Change (Chris Roche, Oxfam, digital file 2010)
1 Sequenced Information Strategy –incorporating short-term programme proposal Paris21 Consortium meeting : June 2000 Tony Williams UK Department.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
OED Perspective on ICR Quality Soniya Carvalho, OED Quality At Entry Course on SFs/CDD April 13, 2005 * Contributions from OED’s ICR Review Panel members.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
(I)WRM indicators A GWP PERSPECTIVE Water Country Briefs Project Diagnostic Workshop, Geneva, December 2010 Mike Muller : GWP-TEC.
1 An introduction to Impact Evaluation (IE) for HIV/AIDS Programs March 12, 2009 Cape Town Léandre Bassolé ACTafrica, The World Bank.
Monitoring and Evaluation Presentation by Kanu Negi Office of Development Effectiveness (ODE), DFAT and David Goodwins Coffey International Development.
1 RealWorld Evaluation Working Under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints 2 EDITION What’s new in … Session #822 presented by Jim Rugh & Michael.
Presentation at UKES and CDI, 27 and 9 April 2016 Jeremy Holland and Florian Schatz Evaluating complex change across projects and contexts: Methodological.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Introduction and Overview
Stages of Research and Development
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Evaluation: For Whom and for What?
Module 2 The SDG Agenda: No-one left behind
Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave No One Behind
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Right-sized Evaluation
Introduction to Evaluation
Corporate-level Evaluation of IFAD’s Decentralization Experience
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Evaluation of Nutrition-Sensitive Programs*
Impact Evaluation Terms Of Reference
Exploring and Using the new foundations of Education (3rd edition) Connection Chapters to promote Literacy Instruction Dr. Dawn Anderson from Western Michigan.
C4SI- Workshop on impact evaluation
Towards a framework for the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies EU-SPRI Governance and relevance: Towards a new generation of research.
Module 7 Key concepts Part 2: EVALUATING COMPLEX DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
Evaluating adaptation
Introduction and Overview
Evaluation Jacqui McDowell.
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
Evaluating the Impact of WHO Publications
CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice
REAL (working with Singizi) Presentation to NSA 3rd/4th August
III. Practical Considerations in preparing a CIE
Mixed Up Multiplication Challenge
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
of the impact of 4 projects of the governmental cooperation
Presentation transcript:

The complex evaluation framework

2 Simple projects, complicated programs and complex development interventions Complicated programs Simple projects blue print producing standardized product relatively linear Limited number of services Time-bound defined and often small target population Defined objectives May include a number of projects and wider scope Often involves several blueprint approaches Defined objectives but often broader and less precise and harder to measure Often not time-bound Context important multiple donors and national agencies country-led planning and evaluation Non linear Many components or services Often covers whole country Multiple and broad objectives May provide budget support with no clear definition of scope or services multiple donors and agencies context is critical Large, complex Small, simple Complex interventions

The Special Challenges of Assessing Outcomes for Complex Programs 3 1.Most conventional impact evaluation designs cannot be applied to evaluating complex programs 2.No clearly defined activities or objectives – General budget and technical support integrated into broader government programs – Multiple activities – Target populations not clearly defined – Time-lines may not be clearly defined

Special challenges continued 3.Multiple actors 4.No baseline data 5.Difficult to define a conventional comparison group

Alternative approaches for defining the counterfactual for complex interventions 1. Theory driven evaluation 3. Quantitative approaches 4.Qualitative approaches 5.Mixed method designs 6.Rating scales 7.Integrated strategies for strengthening the evaluation designs 5

Theory- based approaches strengthening alternative counterfactuals Unpacking complex programs Portfolio analysis Reconstructing baseline data Creative use of secondary data Secondary data Triangulation Qualitative approaches Quantitative approaches STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATING COMPLEX PROGRAMS Rating scales Counterfactual designs Attribution analysis Contribution analysis Substitution analysis Mixed method designs Estimating impacts The value- added of agency X Net increase in resources for a program