MEDCIS Workshops - Litter, 23rd February 2018, Athens

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
Advertisements

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
PHOTO BY: Boštjan Mljač Marine litter (macro & micro) assessment in the Adriatic Sea: Paving the way for harmonized monitoring to facilitate effective.
COCONET SUMMER COURSE “GES & MPAs” Good Environmental Status and Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean and Black Sea Rabat, 8-13 september 2014 Monitoring.
ML management within the MSFD framework: current status and recommendations Ognjen Škunca Conference on regional cooperation in Marine Litter.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
COCONET SUMMER COURSE “GES & MPAs” Good Environmental Status and Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean and Black Sea Rabat, 8-13 september
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
1.
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Guidance report: Methodology for the assessment of ecological coherence of MPA’s Henk Wolters 30 October 2014.
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
JRC’s Follow-up work to improve GES assessment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
D10 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Marine Litter Workshop, Feb 23th, Athens
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
In-Depth Assessment (IDA) of MS submissions for MSFD article 8, 9 & 10 compiled and presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas based on material provided by V.
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.
Technical guidance for assessment under Article 8 MSFD
An Introduction to STAGES
Welcome to the 2nd Mediterranean Natura 2000 Seminar Limassol, Cyprus November 2017 A milestone event of the Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process.
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
Q1: How are the overlaps between MSFD and other EU and RSCs requirements going to be considered and coordinated? How far is the current effort contributing.
MARINE LITTER WITHIN MSFD
State of play EU Commission, Directorate-General Environment
13th Meeting of the Working Group on Economic
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
MSFD Com Dec 2010/ 477/ EU review Recommendations for D2
Technical Subgroup on Marine Litter
Progress on Marine Litter Regional Plan implementation in the Mediterranean Project Coordination Group Meeting.
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
15th meeting of MSCG, 9 February 2015, Brussels
Information on projects
WG GES, 6 December 2016, Brussels
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Marine Litter DG ENV C2 direct projects Progress report
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
MSFD - Technical Group on Marine Litter Progress and future work
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Contaminants Implementation of descriptors Coordination MSFD – WFD , WFD WG chemicals, Bruxelles,
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
1.
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Draft CIS work programme
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
MSFD + External Dimension Progress and next steps
Presentation transcript:

MEDCIS Workshops - Litter, 23rd February 2018, Athens Deliverable 1.1 „Determination of the GES in the Mediterranean, gap analysis, priority needs to improve coherence“ Sašo Gorjanc (IWRS) MEDCIS Workshops - Litter, 23rd February 2018, Athens medcis.eu

Task 1.3: Adjusting GES and targets of marine litter Work in this tasks builds on existing knowledge and achievements under legal commitments under EU MSFD and UNEP/MAP, ongoing developments under the EU Commission Decision revision (2017/847) and outputs from projects, that addressed marine litter in the last years Focus on existing data in the Mediterranean sea on debris in the different compartments for macro and micro litter and microplastics

MEDCIS Deliverable 1.1 This document is the first main outcome of the MEDCIS Activity 1. It determines the main gaps and priorities to improve the coherence of the approaches implemented by Mediterranean EU countries to define GES, set environmental targets and assess the gap between the actual status of the ecosystem to the GES Here we will review the Marine Litter section of the report, authored by Galgani, F., Peterlin M., Kovač Viršek, M., Gorjanc, S., Zeri, C., Paramana, T., Chalkiadaki, O., Dassenakis, M.

Analysis of existing approaches for determination of GES and determination of targets A number of key data gaps: Unequal spread data-sets are available, while not all MSs have fulfilled marine litter MSFD monitoring and data collection Some of the indicators are poorly covered. Esp. lack of data concerning offshore waters Unknown marine litter and microplastics spatial distribution, pathways, and fate Baseline and threshold values determined so far based on limited existing information More information needed to determine optimum marine litter monitoring Limited knowledge about negative effects of marine litter on marine ecosystems

The available information is not adequate for the Mediterranean MSs to set quantitative thresholds related to the reduction of marine litter stranded on beaches. Furthermore, this is even a larger problem for floating and seabed litter and microplastics. It can be very challenging to detect clear reduction trends in the sea that can be associated to the implementation of measures in a particular area.

OVERALL GES ASSESSMENT: All MSs, but Malta have defined GES at descriptor level Generally, the amount of litter should decrease over time (all, but Cyprus) Spain and France included marine litter degradation products in their definitions The socioeconomic and ecological impact of marine litter was specified by France, Slovenia, Croatia, and Cyprus France, Slovenia, and Croatia linked D10 to biodiversity descriptors Only, Slovenia and Spain approach the descriptor in a quantitative way (baselines, thresholds) Level of coherence is moderate Level of integration with other EU/international legislation is rather low

Priorities needs in terms of methodology development and recommendations for improving coherence in the Mediterranean region 4 priority groups: Sources Modelling tools Harmonization of sampling protocols Harm GES TG (Veiga et al., 2016) recommendations: Data collection & site characterization Allocation of likelihoods of marine litter items originated from different potential sources Approach to attribute likelihoods Step further to strategies & measures

Need agreed international monitoring methodologies for monitoring riverine litter Harmonisation of sampling protocols for the sea floor and microplastics needed Monitoring of impacts on biota is challenging Entaglement Ingestion Chemical transfer (chemical contamination) Vector for transport of biota Socioeconomic harm Risk assessments Very limited knowledge regarding ghost fishing (costs and practical difficulties)

RESEARCH PRIORITIES: Identify marine litter pathways (model simulations) Marine litter hotspot mapping (focus on lost fishing gear) Determine the sinks for marine litter Design a GIS platform to support the integration of monitoring data List pathogen and IAS settled on litter Evaluate the effects of marine litter on ecosystems (ecotoxicological studies) Evaluate the distribution of microplastics Rationalisation of monitoring Define specific baselines and targets Identify new indicator species and define impact thresholds Evaluate loss of fish stocks due to ghost fishing Locate ghost nets to support collection

RESEARCH PRIORITIES: Identify marine litter pathways (model simulations) Marine litter hotspot mapping (focus on lost fishing gear) Determine the sinks for marine litter Design a GIS platform to support the integration of monitoring data List pathogen and IAS settled on litter Evaluate the effects of marine litter on ecosystems (ecotoxicological studies) Evaluate the distribution of microplastics Rationalisation of monitoring Define specific baselines and targets Identify new indicator species and define impact thresholds Evaluate loss of fish stocks due to ghost fishing Locate ghost nets to support collection

MEDCIS STRATEGY: Promote and disseminate the master List of Categories of Litter Items and protocols to support harmonised monitoring Focus on microplastics Synthetic review of existing data on D10C2 & identification of the most relevant sources Updating the existing protocols defined by GES TG ML The harmonisation of protocols, data collection processes & the definition on baselines & targets Analyse currently available data from different research projects & literature Define baselines for microlitter Possible specific measures for combating microplastics in the Mediterranean will be identified (alongside the targets) Disseminate the protocols to the stakeholders and actors involved in microplastic monitoring and management

Thank You!